Skip to main content
Log in

Reversals of the Geomagnetic Field: Constraint on Convection Intensity in the Earth’s Core

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern geodynamo models allow the generation of a magnetic field without reversals and with frequent reversals. The transition from one regime to another is associated with a relatively small change in the intensity of the generation sources. From this, it is usually concluded that the geodynamo system is located near such a transition, which, generally speaking, requires a more detailed justification. Such a transition leads to other changes in the behavior of the geomagnetic field, which are analyzed in this paper based on modern geodynamo models, in particular, the degree to which the dipole of the magnetic field is violated, the change in its strength, and the ratio of the decay time and growth of the dipole during the reversal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Anufriev, A.P., Reshetnyak, M.Yu., and Hejda, P., Influence of the inner core on the magnetic-field generation in an αω-dynamo model, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 1997, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 111–114.

  2. Christensen, U.R. and Aubert, J., Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields, Geophys. J. Int., 2006, vol. 166, pp. 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03009.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen, U., Olson, P., and Glatzmaier, G.A., Numerical modelling of the geodynamo: A systematic parameter study, Geophys. J. Int., 1999, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00886.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gastine, T. and Wicht, J., Effects of compressibility on driving zonal flow in gas giants, Icarus, 2012, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2012.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glatzmaier, G.A. and Roberts, P.H., A three-dimension self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal, Nature, 1995, vol. 377, pp. 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glatzmaier, G.A., Coe, R.S., Hongre, L., and Roberts, P.H., The role of the Earth’s mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversal, Nature, vol. 401, pp. 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1038/44776

  7. Hoyng, P., Helicity fluctuations in mean field theory: An explanation for the variability of the solar cycle?, Astron. Astrophys., 1993, vol. 272, pp. 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johns, C.A., Dynamo models and Taylor’s constraint, in Advances in Solar System Magnetohydrodynamics, Priest, R. and Hood, A.W., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991, pp. 25–50.

  9. Kono, M. and Schubert, G., Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 5: Geomagnetism, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009, vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pedlosky, J., Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4650-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Reshetnyak, M.Yu., Tuning of the mean-field geodynamo model, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2017, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351317030090

  12. Reshetnyak, M.Yu., Collapse and recovery of the magnetic field during reversals, Sol. Syst. Res., 2019a, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094619040087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reshetnyak, M.Yu., Evolution of the inner core of the Earth: Consequences for geodynamo, Magnetohydrodynamics, 2019b, vol. 55, nos. 1–2, pp. 175–183. https://doi.org/10.22364/mhd.55.1-2.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reshetnyak, M.Yu. and Hejda, P., Heat flux modulation in domino dynamo model, Open J. Geol., 2013, vol. 2, pp. 55–59. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2013.32B013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reshetnyak, M.Yu. and Pavlov, V.E., Evolution of the dipole geomagnetic field. Observations and models, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2016, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793215060122

  16. Valet, J.-P., Meynadier, L., and Guyodo, Y., Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years, Nature, 2005, vol. 435, pp. 802–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wicht, J., Inner core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 2002, vol. 132, pp. 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(02)00078-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-47-04110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Yu. Reshetnyak.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Let us consider the dynamo equations in a spherical layer \({{r}_{1}} \leqslant r \leqslant {{r}_{0}},\) where (\(r,\theta ,\varphi \)) is a spherical coordinate system, r0 = 1, and ri = 0.35. Entering the following units for speed V, time t, pressure P and magnetic field B, ν/d, d2/ν, ϱν2/d2, and \(\sqrt {2\Omega \varrho \nu \mu } \), where d = r0ri is the unit of length, ν is the coefficient of kinematic viscosity, \(\varrho \) is the density of matter, and μ is the magnetic permeability, we write the system of dynamo equations in the form

$$\begin{gathered} \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{B}}}}{{\partial t}} = \nabla \times ({\mathbf{V}} \times {\mathbf{B}}) + {\text{P}}{{{\text{m}}}^{{ - 1}}}\Delta {\mathbf{B}},\,\,\,\,\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{V}} = 0,\,\,\,\,\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{B}} = 0, \\ \frac{{\partial {\mathbf{V}}}}{{\partial t}} + ({\mathbf{V}} \cdot \nabla ){\mathbf{V}} = - \nabla P - \frac{2}{{\text{E}}}{{{\mathbf{1}}}_{{\mathbf{z}}}} \times {\mathbf{V}} + \frac{{{\text{Ra}}}}{{{\text{Pr}}}}T{{{\mathbf{1}}}_{r}} \\ + \,\,\Delta {\mathbf{V}} + \frac{{\text{1}}}{{{\text{EPm}}}}\left( {\nabla \times {\mathbf{B}}} \right) \times {\mathbf{B}}, \\ \frac{{\partial T}}{{\partial t}} + ({\mathbf{V}} \cdot \nabla )\left( {T + {{T}_{0}}} \right) = {{\Pr }^{{ - 1}}}\Delta T. \\ \end{gathered} $$
(A.1)

The dimensionless Prandtl, Ekman, Rayleigh, and magnetic Prandtl numbers are given in the form \({\text{Pr}} = \frac{\nu }{\kappa },\) \({\text{E}} = \frac{\nu }{{2\Omega {{L}^{2}}}},\) \({\text{Ra}} = \frac{{\alpha {{g}_{o}}\delta T{{d}^{3}}}}{{\nu \kappa }}\) and \({\text{Pm}} = \frac{\nu }{\eta },\) where κ is the coefficient of molecular thermal conductivity, α is the coefficient of volumetric expansion, go is the acceleration of gravity, δT is the unit of temperature perturbation T relative to the “diffusion” (nonconvective) temperature distribution \({{T}_{0}} = \frac{{{{r}_{i}}(r - 1)}}{{r({{r}_{i}} - 1)}},\) and η is the coefficient of magnetic diffusion.

System (A.1) is closed by vacuum boundary conditions for the magnetic field at r0, ri and by zero boundary conditions for the velocity field and temperature perturbations. The work uses the pseudo-spectral, MPI-code Magic adapted for the Gentoo operating system. For expansions in 65 Chebyshev polynomials and 128 spherical functions, 16 cores were used on Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5-2640 computers. The used code is an amazing example of how, thanks to the enormous efforts of German scientists (Wicht, 2002; Gastine and Wicht, 2012), the pioneering prototype code developed at Los Alamos by Harry Glatzmaier (Glatzmaier and Roberts, 1995), was made publicly available on GitHub.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reshetnyak, M.Y. Reversals of the Geomagnetic Field: Constraint on Convection Intensity in the Earth’s Core. Geomagn. Aeron. 61, 266–271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221020134

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221020134

Navigation