Abstract
A theoretical model has been developed for the calculation of the intensity and flux of nighttime Lyman-alpha solar radiation at altitudes of the atmosphere that takes into account the multiple scatterings of this radiation by atmospheric atomic hydrogen. At heights of more than two Earth radii, the number density of atomic hydrogen is calculated by an empirical model based on the agreement of the results of calculations of the Lyman-alpha radiation intensity with the results of measurements of this intensity by TWINS 1 and 2 satellites instruments. At lower heights, it is calculated according to the NRLMSISE-00 empirical model. The temperature of neutral atmospheric components and the O2 number density are taken according to the NRLMSISE-00 model, and the absorption of Lyman-alpha radiation by molecular oxygen is taken into account. The results of measurements of the integral intensity of the Lyman-alpha radiation intensity by the wavelength instruments of the OGO-4 satellite at an height of 650 km are compared at night on January 31, 1968, at high solar activity with the results of model calculations of this intensity. It is shown that the 1.2-fold decrease in [H] in the NRLMSISE-00 model at heights of less than two Earth radii allows satisfactory agreement between the calculated and measured intensities of the radiation in question.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aschwanden, M.J., Physics of the Solar Corona. An Introduction with Problems and Solutions, New York, Berlin: Springer, 2005.
Bishop, J., Transport of resonant atomic hydrogen emissions in the thermosphere and geocorona: Model description and applications, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1999, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(98)00031-4
Brasseur, G.P. and Solomon, S., Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere. Chemistry and Physics of Stratosphere and Mesosphere, Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
Bush, B.C. and Chakrabarti, S., Analysis of Lyman α and He I 584-Å airglow measurements using a spherical radiative transfer model, J. Geophys. Res., 1995a, vol. 100, no. A10, pp. 19609–19626. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA01210
Bush, B.C. and Chakrabarti, S., A radiative transfer model using spherical geometry and partial frequency redistribution, J. Geophys. Res., 1995b, vol. 100, no. A10, pp. 19627–19642. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA01209
Chabrillat, S. and Kockarts, G., Simple parameterization of the absorption of the solar Lyman-alpha line, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1997, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 2659–2662. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL52690
Chabrillat, S. and Kockarts, G., Correction to “Simple parameterization of the absorption of the solar Lyman-alpha line” by Simon Chabrillat and Gaston Kockarts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 79. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL03569
Chamberlain, J.W., Planetary coronae and atmospheric absorption, Planet. Space Sci., 1963, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 901–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(63)90122-3
Chandrasekhar, S., Radiative Transfer, Oxford Univ. Press, 1950; Moscow: IL, 1953.
Hedin, A.E., Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle and lower atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 1991, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02125
Hummer, D.G., Non-coherent scattering: 1. The redistribution functions with Doppler broadening, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 1962, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/125.1.21
Imai, K., Suzuki, M., and Takahashi, C., Evaluation of Voigt algorithms for the ISS/JEM/SMILES L2 data processing system, Adv. Space Res., 2010, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.11.005
Irvine, W.M., Multiple scattering in planetary atmospheres, Icarus, 1975, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(75)90019-6
Jacobson, M.Z., Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Karttunen, H., Kroger, P., Oja, H., Poutanen, M., and Donner, K.J., Fundamental Astronomy, Berlin: Springer, 2017.
Kononovich, E.V. and Moroz, V.I., Obshchii kurs astronomii (General Course of Astronomy), Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004.
Madronich, S., Photodissociation in the atmosphere 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 1987, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 9740–9752. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD08p09740
Meier, R.R. and Mange, P., Geocoronal hydrogen: An analysis of the Lyman-alpha airglow observed from OGO-4, Planet. Space Sci., 1970, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 803–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(70)90080-2
Mihalas, D., Stellar Atmospheres, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1978a, part 1; Moscow: Mir, 1982a, vol. 1.
Mihalas, D., Stellar Atmospheres, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1978b, part 2; Moscow: Mir, 1982b, vol. 2.
Pavlov, A.V., Photochemistry of ions at D-region altitudes of the ionosphere: A review, Surv. Geophys., 2014, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 259–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9253-z
Pavlov, A.V., Influence of atmospheric solar radiation absorption on photodestruction of ions at D-region altitudes of the ionosphere, Surv. Geophys., 2016, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 811–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9371-5
Pavlov, A.V. and Pavlova, N.M., Comparison of electron concentrations in the ionospheric E-Layer maximum in spring conditions obtained by calculations and Moscow ionosonde measurements, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 235–245.https://doi.org/10.7868/S0016794015020145
Peraiah, A., An Introduction to Radiative Transfer: Methods and Applications in Astrophysics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Picone, J.M., Hedin, A.E., Drob, D.P., and Aikin, A.C., NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. SIA15-1–SIA15-16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009430
Reddmann, T. and Uhl, R., The H Lyman-α actinic flux in the middle atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2003, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 225–231. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-225-2003
Rozanov, A., Rozanov, V., and Burrows, J.P., A numerical radiative transfer model for a spherical planetary atmosphere: Combined differential-integral approach involving the Picard iterative approximation, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 2001, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(00)00100-X
Smith, F.L. and Smith, C., Numerical evaluation of Chapman’s grazing incidence integral ch(X, χ), J. Geophys. Res., 1972, vol. 77, no. 19, pp. 3592–3597. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA077i019p03592
Sobolev, V.V., Kurs teoreticheskoi astrofiziki (Course of Theoretical Astrophysics), Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
Stamnes, K., Thomas, G.E., and Stamnes, J.J., Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Strobel, D.F., Young, T.R., Meier, R.R., Coffey, T.P., and Ali, A.W., The nighttime ionosphere: E region and lower F region, J. Geophys. Res., 1974, vol. 79, no. 22, pp. 3171–3178. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA079i022p03171
Thomas, G.E., Lyman α scattering in the Earth’s Hydrogen geocorona, 1, J. Geophys. Res., 1963, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 2639–2660. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ068i009p02639
Tobiska, W.K., Revised solar extreme ultraviolet flux model, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1991, vol. 53, nos. 11–12, pp. 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(91)90046-A
Woods, T.N., Tobiska, W.K., Rottman, G.J., and Worden, J.R., Improved solar Lyman α irradiance modeling from 1947 through 1999 based on UARS observations, J. Geophys. Res., 2000, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 27195–27216. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000051
Zoennchen, J.H., Nass, U., and Fahr, H.J., Terrestrial exospheric hydrogen density distributions under solar minimum and solar maximum conditions observed by the TWINS stereo mission, Ann. Geophys., 2015, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 413–426. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-413-2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavlov, A.V., Pavlova, N.M. Comparison of the Intensity of the Nighttime Scattered Atmospheric Radiation in the Lyman-Alpha Line from OGO-4 Satellite Measurements and Calculations. Geomagn. Aeron. 60, 489–494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322004012X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322004012X