Skip to main content
Log in

The Second Waldmeier Rule and the Form of the 11-Year Cycle

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that the form of the 11-year solar-activity cycle can be approximately described by its amplitude A and the arrangement of three characteristic moments: the moment of the minimum (Tmin), maximum (Tmax), and the subsequent minimum (Tmin2). According to the classical Waldmeier rule, there is an anticorrelation between the maximum activity value (amplitude) of cycle A and the duration of its ascending branch Tmax – Tmin, while the correlation between A and the length of the downward branch of the cycle Tmin2 – Tmax is much lower. Following Waldmeier, the moment TV can be entered near the end of the downward branch of the cycle, in which the activity falls within a certain (low) specified level V. The relationship between the length of the corresponding phase of cycle TV – Tmax and the amplitude of this cycle is quite strong. We demonstrate that this connection, which can be called the “second Waldmeier rule,” agrees well with the fact that the downward branch of the cycle has a universal appearance. Thus, one parameter, its value is at the maximum, is enough for an approximate qualitative description of the form of a single 11-year cycle that takes into account the two Waldmeier rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cameron, R.H. and Schüssler, M., The turbulent diffusion of toroidal magnetic flux as inferred from properties of the sunspot butterfly diagram, Astron. Astrophys., 2016, vol. 591, id A46.

  2. Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., and Reichmann, E.J., The shape of the sunspot cycle, Sol. Phys., 1994, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyt, D.V. and Schatten, K.H., Group sunspot numbers: A new solar activity reconstruction, Sol. Phys., 1998, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanov, V.G., Shape of the 11-year cycle of solar activity and the evolution of latitude characteristics of the sunspot distribution, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2018, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 930–936.

  5. Vitinskii, Yu.I., Kopetskii, M., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistika pyatno-obrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti Solntsa (Statistics of Spot-Formation Activity of the Sun), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

  6. Waldmeier, M., Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve, Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidgenössischen Sternwarte Zürich, 1935, vol. 14, pp. 105–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was carried out with the partial support of the grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-02-00088, the Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 12, and the State Mission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. G. Ivanov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanov, V.G. The Second Waldmeier Rule and the Form of the 11-Year Cycle. Geomagn. Aeron. 59, 1070–1074 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219080085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219080085

Navigation