Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostics of Turbulent Dynamo from the Flux Emergence Rate in Solar Active Regions

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Line-of-sight magnetograms acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamic Observatory (SDO) and by the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) for 14 emerging ARs were used to study the derivative of the total unsigned flux–the flux emergence rate, R(t). We found that the emergence regime is not universal: each AR displays a unique emergence process. Nevertheless, two types of the emergence process can be identified. First type is a “regular” emergence with quasi-constant behavior of R(t) during a 1–3 day emergence interval with a rather low magnitude of the flux derivative, Rmax = (0.57 ± 0.22) × 1022 Mx day–1. The second type can be described as “accelerated” emergence with a long interval (>1 day) of the rapidly increasing flux derivative R(t) that result in a rather high magnitude of Rmax= (0.92 ± 0.29) × 1022 Mx day–1, which later changes to a very short (about a one third of day) interval of R(t) = const followed by a monotonous decrease of R(t). The first type events might be associated with emergence of a flux tube with a constant amount of flux that rises through the photosphere with a quasi-constant speed. Such events can be explained by the traditional largescale solar dynamo generating the toroidal flux deep in the convective zone. The second-type events can be interpreted as a signature of sub-surface turbulent dynamo action that generates additional magnetic flux (via turbulent motions) as the magnetic structure makes its way up to the solar surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramenko, V.I., Yurchyshyn, V.B., and Goode, P.R., Observational signatures of the small-scale dynamo in the quiet Sun, ASP Conf. Ser., 2012, vol. 455, pp. 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, A., Sokoloff, D., and Subramanian, K., Current status of turbulent dynamo theory. From large-scale to small-scale dynamos, Space Sci. Rev., 2012, vol. 169, pp. 123–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, F., On the origin of magnetic fields in the quiet photosphere, Astrophys. J., 1999, vol. 515, pp. L39–L42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau, P., Dynamo models of the solar cycle, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2010, vol. 7, id 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaar, H., Ephemeral regions on a sequence of full-disk Michelson Doppler Imager magnetograms, Astrophys. J., 2001, vol. 555, pp. 448–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsenko, A.S. and Abramenko, V.I., Using SDO/HMI magnetograms as a source of the solar mean magnetic field data, Sol. Phys., 2016, vol. 291, pp. 1613–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhao, X., and Hoeksema, J.T., Correction of offset in MDI/SOHO magnetograms, Sol. Phys., 2004, vol. 219, pp. 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Hoeksema, J.T., Scherrer, P.H., et al., Comparison of line-of-sight magnetograms taken by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager and Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Michelson Doppler Imager, Sol. Phys., 2012, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miesch, M.S., The dynamo dialectic: An inside look at the current solar minimum, ASP Conf. Ser., 2010, vol. 428, pp. 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesch, M.S., The solar dynamo, philosophical transactions, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 2012, vol. 370, pp. 3049–3069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E.N., The formation of sunspots from the solar toroidal field, Astrophys. J., 1955, vol. 121, pp. 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarila Graham, J., Cameron, R., and Schüssler, M., Turbulent small-scale dynamo action in solar surface simulations, Astrophys. J., 2010, vol. 714, pp. 1606–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., et al., The Solar Oscillations Investigation—Michelson Doppler Imager, Sol. Phys., 1995, vol. 162, nos. 1–2, pp. 129–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, P.H., Schou, J., Bush, R.I., et al., The helioseismic and magnetic imager (HMI) investigation for the solar dynamics observatory (SDO), Sol. Phys., 2012, vol. 275, pp. 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, C.J. and Zwaan, C., Solar and Stellar Magnetic Activity, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shibalova, A.S., Obridko, V.N., and Sokoloff, D.D., Intermittency of the solar magnetic field and solar magnetic activity cycle, Sol. Phys., 2017, vol. 292, no. 3, id 44. doi 10.1007/s11207-017-1069-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, D.D., Khlystova, A., and Abramenko, V., Solar small-scale dynamo and polarity of sunspot groups, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 2015, vol. 451, pp. 1522–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugarte-Urra, I., Upton, L., Warren, H.P., and Hathaway, D.H., Magnetic flux transport and the long-term evolution of solar active regions, Astrophys. J., 2015, vol. 815, pp. 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vögler, A. and Schüssler, M., A solar surface dynamo, Astron. Astrophys., 2007, vol. 465, pp. L43–L46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, C., A dynamo scenario: Observational constraints on dynamo theory, Sol. Phys., 1996, vol. 169, pp. 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Abramenko.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abramenko, V.I., Tikhonova, O.I. & Kutsenko, A.S. Diagnostics of Turbulent Dynamo from the Flux Emergence Rate in Solar Active Regions. Geomagn. Aeron. 57, 792–797 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793217070027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793217070027

Navigation