Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 56, Issue 8, pp 987–992 | Cite as

The Maunder minimum as a secular minimum with non-stopped Sunspot cyclicity

  • N. V. Zolotova
  • D. I. Ponyavin
Article

Abstract

One of the most enigmatic features of the solar history is the Maunder minimum (1645–1715). We compare the scatter of amplitudes of the 11-year cycles, according to the new Sunspot Number and Sunspot Group series version 2.0, along with scenario of the Maunder minimum as a period with non-stopped cyclicity. We demonstrate that both amplitude and duration of cycles after the Gleissberg and Maunder minima are similar. Moreover, times of minima and maxima of cycles in the course the Maunder minimum coincide with those during the Gleissberg one, indicating a secular variation. Usefulness of the proxy data within the Maunder minimum is discussed. The scatter of amplitudes and duration of the Schwabe cycles in the past is argued to be comparable with those in the modern epoch.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F.J., Sunspots or Sun’s planets—Jean Tarde and the sunspot controversy of the early 17th century, J. History Astron., 1987, vol. 18, pp. 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carrasco, V.M.S., Álvarez, J.V., and Vaquero, J.M., Sunspots during the Maunder minimum from Machina Coelestis by Hevelius, Sol. Phys., 2015, vol. 290, pp. 2719–2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clette, F., Cliver, E.W., Lefèvre, L., Svalgaard, L., and Vaquero, J.M., Revision of the sunspot number(s), Space Weather, 2015, vol. 13, pp. 529–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., and Cliver, E.W., Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle, Space Sci. Rev., 2014, vol. 186, pp. 35–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cliver, E.W., Clette, F., and Svalgaard, L., Recalibrating the sunspot number (SSN): The SSN workshops, Cent. Eur. Astrophys. Bull., 2013, vol. 37, pp. 401–416.Google Scholar
  6. Derham, W., Observations upon the spots that have been upon the sun, from the year 1703 to 1711. With a letter of Mr. Crabtrie, in the year 1640 upon the same subject by the reverend Mr. William Derham, R.S., R. Soc. London: Philos. Trans. Series I, 1710, vol. 27, pp. 270–290.Google Scholar
  7. Eddy, J.A., The Maunder minimum, Science, 1976, vol. 192, pp. 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ettmüller, M.E., De maculis in sole visis disseret praeses M. Augustinus Vagetius, (et) respondens Michael Ernestus Ettmüllerus, Wittenbergae: Kreusigius, 1693.Google Scholar
  9. Feynman, J. and Ruzmaikin, A., The Sun’s strange behavior: Maunder minimum or Gleissberg cycle? Sol. Phys., 2011, vol. 272, pp. 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forbes, E., Murdin, L., and Wilmoth, F., The Correspondence of John Flamsteed, the First Astronomer Royal, vol. 2, Bristol: Taylor and Francis, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Gleissberg, W., A secular change in the shape of the spot-frequency curve, Observatory, 1944, vol. 65, pp. 244–244.Google Scholar
  12. Gleissberg, W., Secularly smoothed data on the minima and maxima of sunspot frequency, Sol. Phys., 1967, vol. 2, pp. 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleissberg, W., Damboldt, T., and Schove, D.J., Reflections of the Maunder minimum of sunspots, J. Br. Astron. Assoc., 1979, vol. 89, pp. 440–449.Google Scholar
  14. von Guericke, O. and Schott, K., Ottonis De Guericke Experimenta Nova (ut vocantur) Magdeburgica De Vacuo Spatio, Amsterdam: Jansson à Waesberge, 1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hevelius, J., Cometographia, Totam Naturam Cometarum: Utpote Sedem, Parallaxes, Distantias, Ortum & Interitum, Capitum, Caudarumque diversas facies, affectionesque, Nec Non Motum eorum summe admirandum, … Ac Iconibus aeri incisis plurimis illustrantur. Cumprimis vero, Cometae Anno 1652, 1661, 1664 & 1665 ab ipso Auctore … expenduntur …, Gedani, 1668.Google Scholar
  16. Hevelius, J., Machina coelestis. 2, Rerum Uranicarum Observationes, Tam Eclipsium Luminarium, quam Occultationum Planetarum, & Fixarum, Nec non Altitudinum Meridianarum Solarium, Solstitiorum, & Aequinoctiorum; Una cum Reliquorum Planetarum, Fixarumq(ue) omnium hactenus cognitarum, …, Gedani, 1679.Google Scholar
  17. Hockey, T., Trimble, V., and Williams, T.R., The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers, New York: Springer, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoyt, D.V. and Schatten, K.H., Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction, Sol. Phys., 1998, vol. 181, pp. 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, M.J., An address delivered at the annual general meeting of the society, February 13, 1857, on presenting the Gold medal to M. Schwabe, Mem. R. Astron. Soc., 1858, vol. 26, pp. 196–204.Google Scholar
  20. King, H., The history of the Telescope, New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
  21. Kopecky, M. and Kuklin, G.V., One possible explanation of Maunder’s minimum of sunspots, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 1987, vol. 38, pp. 193–200.Google Scholar
  22. Kuleshova, A.I., Dergachev, V.A., Kudryavtsev, I.V., Nagovitsyn, Y.A., and Ogurtsov, M.G., Possible influence of climate factors on the reconstruction of the cosmogenic isotope, 14C production rate in the Earth’s atmosphere and solar activity in past epochs, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1071–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lassen, K. and Friis-Christensen, E., Variability of the solar cycle length during the past five centuries and the apparent association with terrestrial climate, J. Atm. Terr. Phys., 1995, vol. 57, pp. 835–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loysha, V.A., Krakovetsky, Y.K., and Popov, L.N., Aurorae: the Catalogue from IV to XVIII Centuries, Moscow: VINITI, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. Manfredi, E., De gnomone meridiano Bononiensi ad divi Petronii deque observationibus astronomicis eo instrumento ab ejus constructione ad hoc tempus peractis auctore Eustachio Manfredio, Bononiae: ex typographia Laelii a Vulpe, 1736.Google Scholar
  26. Maunder, E.W., The sun and sun-spots, 1820–1920, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 1922, vol. 82, pp. 534–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Pevtsov, A.A., and Livingston, W.C., On a possible explanation of the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength, Astrophys. J. Lett., 2012, vol. 758, id L20.Google Scholar
  28. Newcomb, S., On the period of the solar spots, Astrophys. J., 1901, vol. 13, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuhaüser, R. and Neuhaüser, D.L., Sunspot numbers based on historic records in the 1610s: Early telescopic observations by Simon Marius and others, Astronomische Nachrichten, 2016, vol. 337, pp. 581–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Obridko, V.N. and Badalyan, O.G., Cyclic and secular variations sunspot groups with various scales, Astron. Rep., 2014, vol. 58, pp. 936–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ogurtsov, M.G., Instrumental data on the sunspot formation in the 17th–18th centuries: Correct information or approximations, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2013, vol. 53, pp. 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ribes, J.C. and Nesme-Ribes, E., The solar sunspot cycle in the Maunder minimum AD1645 to AD1715, Astron. Astrophys., 1993, vol. 276, pp. 549–563.Google Scholar
  33. Schove, D.J., The sunspot cycle, 649 B.C. to A.D. 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 1955, vol. 60, pp. 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schove, D.J., Sunspot turning-points and aurorae since A.D. 1510, Sol. Phys., 1979, vol. 63, pp. 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schröder, W., Case Studies on the Spörer, Maunder and Dalton Minima, Potsdam: AKGGP, Science Edition, 2005.Google Scholar
  36. Svalgaard, L., Solar activity—past, present, future, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2013, vol. 3, id A24.Google Scholar
  37. Svalgaard, L., Cagnotti, M., and Cortesi, S., The effect of sunspot weighting, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.01119.Google Scholar
  38. Svalgaard, L. and Schatten, K.H., Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: The backbone method, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00755.Google Scholar
  39. Usoskin, I.G., Solanki, S.K., Schüssler, M., Mursula, K., and Alanko, K., Millennium-scale sunspot number reconstruction: Evidence for an unusually active Sun since the 1940s, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, vol. 91, id 211101Google Scholar
  40. Usoskin, I.G., Arlt, R., Asvestari, E., Hawkins, E., Käpylä, M., et al. The Maunder minimum (1645–1715) was indeed a grand minimum: A reassessment of multiple datasets, Astron. Astrophys., 2015a, vol. 581, id A95, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Usoskin, I.G., Kovaltsov, G.A., Lockwood, M., Mursula, K., Owens, M., and Solanki, S.K., A New calibrated sunspot group series since 1749: Statistics of active day fractions, 2015b. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06421.Google Scholar
  42. Vaquero, J.M., Gallego, M.C., Usoskin, I.G., and Kovaltsov, G.A., Revisited sunspot data: A new scenario for the onset of the Maunder minimum, Astrophys. J., 2011, vol. 731, id L24.Google Scholar
  43. Vaquero, J.M., Kovaltsov, G.A., Usoskin, I.G., Carrasco, V.M.S., and Gallego, M.C., Level and length of cyclic solar activity during the Maunder minimum as deduced from the active-day statistics, Astron. Astrophys., 2015, vol. 577, id A71.Google Scholar
  44. Vitinskij, Y.I., Kopetskij, M., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistics of the Spot-Forming Activity of the Sun, Moscow: Nauka, 1986.Google Scholar
  45. Weiss, J.E. and Weiss, N.O., Andrew Marvell and the Maunder minimum, Quart. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1979, vol. 20, pp. 115–118.Google Scholar
  46. Wittmann, A., The sunspot cycle before the Maunder minimum, Astron. Astrophys., 1978, vol. 66, pp. 93–97.Google Scholar
  47. Wolf, C., Histoire de l’Observatoire de Paris de sa fondation à 1793, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1902.Google Scholar
  48. Wolf, R., Astronomische Mitteilungen über die Sonnenflecken I bis X, Zürich: Eidgenössische Sternwarte, 1856.Google Scholar
  49. Zolotova, N.V. and Ponyavin, D.I., The Maunder minimum is not as Grand as it seemed to be, Astrophys. J., 2015a, vol. 800, id 42.Google Scholar
  50. Zolotova, N.V. and Ponyavin, D.I., The Maunder minimum: Revision, in Proceedings of the Pulkovo Conference “Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics-2015”, 2015b, pp. 157–160.Google Scholar
  51. Zolotova, N.V., and Ponyavin, D.I., How deep was the Maunder minimum? Sol. Phys., 2016. doi 10.1007/s11207-016-0908-zGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulkovo Astronomical ObservatoryRussian Academy of SciencesSaint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations