Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 32–42 | Cite as

Dependence of the Pc4 magnetic pulsation parameters on the radiated power of the EISCAT HF heating facility

  • T. D. BorisovaEmail author
  • N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya
  • I. M. Ivanova
  • M. T. Rietveld


The interaction between the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere in a situation when artificial disturbances are generated in the F region of the auroral ionosphere with the EISCAT/Heating facility is studied. An experiment was performed in the daytime when the facility effective radiated power changed in a stepwise manner. Wavelike disturbances with periods of (130–140) s corresponding to Pc4 pulsations were simultaneously registered by the method of bi-static backscatter and with ground magnetometers. The variations in the Doppler frequency shift were correlated with the changes in the facility power. Incoherent scatter radar measurements at a frequency of 930 MHz (Tromsö) and numerical calculations were used in an analysis. It has been indicated that the ionospheric drift of small-scale artificial ionospheric irregularities was modulated by magnetospheric Alfvén waves. The possible effect of powerful HF radioemission on the Alfvén wave amplitude owing to the modification of the magnetospheric resonator ionospheric edge reflectivity and the generation of an outgoing Alfvén wave above the region where the ionospheric conductivity is locally intensified has been considered.


Doppler Frequency Shift Geomagnetic Pulsation Facility Power Ionospheric Conductivity Vertical Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Geofizicheskie effekty aktivnykh vozdeistvii v okolozemnom kosmicheskom prostranstve (Geophysical Effects of Active Impacts in the NearEarth Space), St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Chernyshev, M.Yu., and Kornienko, V.A., Excitation of Small-Scale Waves in the F Region of the Ionosphere by Powerful HF Radio Waves, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1998a, vol. 60, pp. 1225–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Kornienko, V.A., Petlenko, A.V., Brekke, A., and Rietveld, M.T., Geophysical Phenomena during an Ionospheric Modification Experiment at Tromsö, Ann. Geophys., 1998b, vol. 16, pp. 1212–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Borisova, T.D., Kornienko, V.A., Thidé, B., Rietveld, M.T., Kosch, M.J., and Bosinger, T., Phenomena in the Ionosphere-Magnetosphere System Induced by Injection of Powerful HF Radio Waves into Nightside Auroral Ionosphere, Ann. Geophys., 2005, vol. 23, pp. 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Carlson, H.C., Kornienko, V.A., Borisova, T.D., Rietveld, M.T., Yeoman, T.K., and Brekke, A., Phenomena Induced by Powerful HF Pumping towards Magnetic Zenith with a Frequency near the F-Region Critical Frequency and the Third Electron Gyro Harmonic Frequency, Ann. Geophys., 2009, vol. 27, pp. 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borisova, T.D., Blagoveshchenskaya, N.F., Kornienko, V.A., and Rietveld, M., Characteristics of Pc4-5 Pulsations Obtained by the HF Radiowave Bi-Static Backscatter Method Using the HF EISCAT/Heating Facility and Ground Magnetometers, Geomagn. Aeron., 2011, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 630–642.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, L. and Hasegawa, A., A Theory of Long Period Magnetic Pulsations. 1. Steady State Excitation of Field Line Resonances, J. Geophys. Res., 1974, vol. 79, pp. 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frank-Kamenetskii, D.A., Lektsii po fizike plazmy (Plasma Physics Lectures), Moscow: Atomizdat, 1968.Google Scholar
  9. Gershman, B.N., Erukhimov, L.M., and Yashin, Yu.Ya., Volnovye yavleniya v ionosfere i kosmicheskoi plazme (Wave Phenomena in the Ionosphere and Cosmic Plasma), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Gurevich, A.V., Nonlinear Phenomena in the Ionosphere, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 2007, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 1145–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurevich, A.V. and Shvartsburg, A.B., Nelineinaya teoriya rasprostraneniya radiovoln v ionosfere (Nonlinear Theory of Radiowave Propagation in the Ionosphere), Moscow: Nauka, 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Kleimenova, N.G., Geomagnetic Pulsations, in Model’ kosmosa: t. 1: Fizicheskie usloviya v kosmicheskom prostranstve (Space Model, vol. 1, Physical Conditions in the Space), Panasyuk, M.I. et al., Eds., 2007, pp. 611–626.Google Scholar
  13. Kozlovsky, A.E. and Lyatsky, W.B., Alfvén Wave Generation by Disturbance of Ionospheric Conductivity in the Field-Aligned Current Region, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 17 297–17 303.Google Scholar
  14. Leyser, T.B. and Wong, A.Y., Powerful Electromagnetic Waves for Active Environmental Research in Geospace, Rev. Geophys., 2009, vol. 47, p. RG1001; doi:10.1029/2007RG000235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyatsky, V.B. and Maltsev, Yu.P., Magnitosferno-ionosfernoe vzaimodeistvie (Magnetospheric-Ionospheric Coupling), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Lyatsky, W.B., Belova, E.G., and Pashin, A.B., Artificial Magnetic Pulsation Generation by Powerful Ground-Based Transmitter, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1996, vol. 58, pp. 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lysak, R.L., Electrodynamic Coupling of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 1990, vol. 52, pp. 33–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olson, J.V. and Rostoker, G., Longitudional Phase Variation of Pc4-5 Micropulsations, J. Geophys. Res., 1978, vol. 83, pp. 2481–2488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pilipenko, V.A., Resonance Effects of ULF Wave Fields in the near-Earth Space, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Phys.-Math.) Dissertation, IKI RAN, Moscow, 2006, p. 34, D 002.113.03.Google Scholar
  20. Rietveld, M.T., Kohl, H., Kopka, H., and Stubbe, P., Introduction to Ionospheric Heating at Tromsö. 1. Experimental Overview, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1993, vol. 55, pp. 577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rishbeth, H. and van Eyken, T., EISCAT: Early History and the First Ten Years of Operation, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1993, vol. 55, pp. 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robinson, T.R., Strangeway, R., Wright, D.M., et al., FAST Observations of ULF Waves Injected into the Magnetosphere by Means of Modulated RF Heating of the Auroral Electrojet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2000, vol. 27, pp. 3165–3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stubbe, P., Review of Ionospheric Modification Experiments at Tromsö, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 1996, vol. 58, pp. 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Uryadov, V.P., Vertogradov, G.G., Vertogradov, V.G., Ponyatov, A.A., and Frolov, V.L., Radar Observations of Artificial Ionospheric Turbulence during a Magnetic Storm, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Radiofiz., 2004, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 722–738.Google Scholar
  25. Yagova, N.V., Pilipenko, V.A., and Fedorov, E.N., On the effect of the Ionospheric Conductivity on the Parameters of the Midlatitude Pc3–4 Pulsation, Geomagn. Aeron., 1998, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 67–73 [Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. transl.), 1998, vol. 38, pp. 186–191].Google Scholar
  26. Yeoman, T.K., Wright, D.M., Robinson, T.R., Davies, J.A., and Rietveld, M., High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Observations of an Impulse-Driven Field Line Resonance in Radar Backscatter Artificially Generated with the Troms-Heater, Ann. Geophys., 1997, vol. 15, pp. 634–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yeoman, T.K., Baddeley, L.J., Dhillon, R.S., Robinson, T.R., and Wright, D.M., Bistatic Observations of Large and Small Scale ULF Waves in SPEAR-Induced HF Coherent Backscatter, Ann. Geophys., 2008, vol. 26, pp. 2253–2263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yutlo, U. and Koen, R., Ionospheric Variations Caused by Powerful Radiowaves, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 1973, vol. 109, pp. 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Borisova
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya
    • 1
  • I. M. Ivanova
    • 1
  • M. T. Rietveld
    • 2
  1. 1.Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AANII)Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.EISCAT Tromsö DivisionTromsöNorway

Personalised recommendations