Abstract
The ratio of the values of the F 2, layer critical frequencies 2 h after the sunset and at 1400 LT has been considered. It is assumed that this ratio is a good indicator of the intensity of wind processes in the thermosphere. For 18 ionospheric stations, the dependences of this ratio on the F wl, solar activity index have been constructed for the period before 1980. It has been found that the standard deviation (S), from this dependence has been increased after 1980 at all stations. An increase in S, is interpreted as an indication of the existence of long-term trends in th e wind regime after approximately 1980.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Bremer, “Trends over the Ionospheric E, and F, Regions over Europe,” Ann. Geophys. 16(8), 986–996 (1998).
A. D. Danilov and A. V. Mikhailov, “Spatial and Seasonal Variations of the foF2, Long-Term Trends,” Ann. Geophys. 17(9), 1239–1243 (1999).
A. D. Danilov and L. B. Vanina-Dart, “Critical Frequencies foF2, as an Indicator of Trends in Thermospheric Dynamics,” Geomagn. Aeron. 48(6), 810–822 (2008b) [Geomagn. Aeron. 48, 775-786 (2008b)].
A. D. Danilov and L. B. Vanina-Dart, “Spatial and Time Variations in the f,oF,2(Night)/f,oF,2(Day) Ratio: Specification of Some Effects,” Geomagn. Aeron. 48(2), 228–240 (2008a) [Geomagn. Aeron. 48, 220–231 (2008a)].
A. D. Danilov and L. B. Vanina-Dart, “Scatter of hmF2, Values as an Indicator of Trends in the Thermospheric Dynamics,” Geomagn. Aeron. 49(1), 58–62 (2009) [Geomagn. Aeron. 49, 53–57 (2009)].
A. D. Danilov, “Critical FrequenciesfoF2 as an Indicator of Trends in Thermospheric Dynamics,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. (2008c).
A. D. Danilov, “Long-Term Trends in the Relation between Daytime and Nighttime Values of foF2,”, Ann. Geophys. 26(5), 1199–1206 (2008a).
A. D. Danilov, “Scatter of hmF2, Values as an Indicator of Trends in Thermospheric Dynamics,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 71, 1586–1591 (2009).
A. D. Danilov, “Time and Spatial Variations in the Ratio of Nighttime and Daytime Critical Frequencies of the F 2, Layer,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 70(8), 1201–1212 (2008b).
A. D. Danilov, “Time and Spatial Variations in the Ratio of the Nighttime and Daytime Critical Frequencies of the F 2, Layer,” Geomagn. Aeron. 47(6), 751–760 (2007) [Geomagn. Aeron. 47, 710–719 (2007)].
J. Lastovicka, R. A. Akmaev, G. Beig, J. Bremer, J. T. Em-mert, C. Jacobi, G. Jarvis, M. J. Nedoluha, Yu. I. Port-nyagin, and T. Ulich, “Emerging Pattern of Global Change in the Upper Atmosphere and Ionosphere,” Ann. Geophys. 26(5), 1255–1268 (2008).
J. Lastovicka, A. V. Mikhailov, T. Ulich, et al., “Long-Term Trends infoF2: A, Comparison of Various Methods,” J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 68(17), 1854–1870 (2006).
H. Rishbeth, “How the Thermospheric Circulation Affects the Ionospheric F 2, Layer,” J. Atmos. Solar—Terr. Phys. 60(14), 1385–1402(1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.D. Danilov, L.B. Vanina-Dart, 2010, published in Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiya, 2010, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 61–66.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Danilov, A.D., Vanina-Dart, L.B. Comparison of foF2 values in the daytime and after sunset. Geomagn. Aeron. 50, 58–63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321001007X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321001007X