Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 353–367 | Cite as

Electric field enhancement in an auroral arc according to the simultaneous radar (EISCAT) and optical (ALIS) observations

  • V. V. SafargaleevEmail author
  • T. I. Sergienko
  • A. E. Kozlovsky
  • I. Sandahl
  • U. Brändström
  • D. N. Shibaeva
Article

Abstract

The character of a change in the ionospheric electric field when several auroral arcs crossed the region of radar measurements has been analyzed. In one case the plasma conductivity and electric field normal component in an arc increased as compared to their undisturbed values. In another case the field and conductivity changed traditionally (in antiphase). Arcs with an increased field were previously classified as correlating arcs, but their existence was subsequently open to question during optical observations. The usage of the ALIS system of digital cameras made it possible to decrease the errors introduced by optical equipment. The measurements in the vicinity of correlating arcs were performed when these arcs were generated, and a traditional arc was a completed formation. In an originating arc, the field value can depend not only on the ionospheric plasma conductivity but also on the processes in the magnetospheric-ionospheric system resulting in the field enhancement.

PACS numbers

94.30.Aa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. T. Aikio, H. J. Opgenoorth, M. A. L. Persson, and K. Kaila, “Ground Based Measurements of an Arc-Associated Electric Field,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 55(4/5), 797–807 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. T. Aikio, T. Lakkala, A. Kozlovsky, and P. J. Williams, “Electric Fields and Currents of Stable Drifting Auroral Arcs in the Evening Sector,” J. Geophys. Res. 107, JA009172 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. E. Borovsky, “Auroral Arc Thicknesses as Predicted by Various Theories,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6101–6138 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. U. Frey, G. Haerendel, S. Buchert, and B. S. Lanchester, “Auroral-Arc Splitting by Intrusion of a New Convection Channel,” Ann.Geophys. 14(12), 1257–1264 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. V. Golovchanskaya and Y. P. Maltsev, “Interchange Instability in the Presence of the Field-Aligned Current: Application to the Auroral Arc Formation,” J. Geophys. Res. 108, JA009505 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Haerendel, S. Buchert, C. La Hoz, et al., “On the Proper Motion of Auroral Arcs,” J. Geophys. Res. 98(4), 6087–6099 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Knudsen, “Structure, Acceleration, and Energy in Auroral Arcs and the Role of Alfvén Waves,” Space Sci. Rev. 95(1/2), 501–511 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kozlovsky and J. Kangas, “Motion and Origin of Noon High-Latitude Poleward Moving Auroral Arcs on Closed Magnetic Field Lines,” J. Geophys. Res. 107, JA900145 (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. E. Kozlovsky and W. B. Lyatsky, “Instability of Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Convection and Formation of Auroral Arcs,” Ann. Geophys. 12(7), 636–641 (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. S. Lanchester, K. Kaila, and I. W. McCrea, “Relationship between Large Horizontal Electric Fields and Auroral Arc Elements,” J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5076–5084 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. T. Marklund, “Auroral Arc Classification Scheme Based on the Observed Arc-Associated Electric Field Pattern,” Planet. Space Sci. 32(2), 193–211 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Nielsen, R. Elphinstone, D. Hearn, et al., “Oval Intensification Event Observed by STARE and Viking,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6163–6171 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. J. Opgenoorth, I. Haggstrom, P. J. Williams, and G. O. Jones, “Regions of Strongly Enhanced Perpendicular Electric Fields Adjacent to Auroral Arcs,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 52(6), 449–458 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Pietrovsky, K. A. Lynch, R. B. Torbert, et al., “Multipoint Measurements of Large DC Electric Fields and Shears in the Auroral Zone,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26(22), 3369–3372 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. V. Safargaleev, A. E. Kozlovsky, S. V. Osipenko, and V. R. Tagirov, “Azimuthal Expansion of High Latitude Auroral Arcs,” Ann. Geophys. 21(7), 1793–1805 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Safargaleev, S. V. Osipenko, and A. N. Vasil’ev, “Special Periodic Arclike Forms in the Region of Pulsating Auroras,” Geomagn. Aeron. 40(6), 38–43 (2000) [Geomagn. Aeron. 40, 716–723 (2000)].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. C. Samson, T. J. Hughes, F. Creutzberg, et al., “Observations of a Detached, Discrete Arc in Association with Field Line Resonances,” J. Geophys. Res. 96(9), 15 683–15 695 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Schlegel and D. R. Moorcroft, “EISCAT as a Tristatic Auroral Radar,” J. Geophys. Res. 94, 1430–1438 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. V. Stepanova, E. E. Antonova, J. M. Bosqued, R. A. Kovrazhkin, and K. R. Aubel, “Asymmetry of Auroral Electron Precipitations and Its Relationship to the Substorm Expansion Phase Onset,” J. Geophys. Res. 107, JA003503 (2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. A. Volkov and Yu. P. Maltsev, “Flute Instability of the Plasma Sheet Inner Boundary,” Geomagn. Aeron. 26(5), 798–801 (1986).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O. de la Beaujardiére, R. Vondrak, R. Heelis, et al., “Auroral Arc Electrodynamics Parameter Measured by AE-C and Chatanika Radar,” J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4671–4685 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O. de la Beaujardiére, R. Vondrak, and M. Baron, “Radar Observations of Electric Fields and Currents Associated with Auroral Arcs,” J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5051–5062 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. F. del Pozo, P. J. S. Williams, N. J. Gazey, et al., “Multi-Instrument Observations of the Dynamics of Auroral Arcs: A Case Study,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 64(15), 1601–1616 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Safargaleev
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. I. Sergienko
    • 2
  • A. E. Kozlovsky
    • 3
  • I. Sandahl
    • 2
  • U. Brändström
    • 2
  • D. N. Shibaeva
    • 4
  1. 1.Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity Division, Kola Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesApatity, Murmansk oblastRussia
  2. 2.Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsKirunaSweden
  3. 3.Sodankyla Geophysical ObservatorySodankylaFinland
  4. 4.Kola BranchPetrozavodsk State UniversityApatity, Murmansk oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations