Skip to main content
Log in

Features of morning-time auroras during SC

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optical observations on Heiss Island and the ion drift measurements on the DMSP F8 satellite were used to study the aurora characteristics and ionospheric convection before and after SC registered at 2330 UT on January 13, 1988. It has been indicated that two zones of luminosity can be distinguished in morning-time auroras during the quiet period before SC: the soft zone with auroral arcs and the harder diffuse auroral zone (equatorward of the first zone). After SC, a gradual smooth activation of auroras in both zones was followed (4–5 min later) by a more abrupt intensification of diffuse luminosity and by the appearance of numerous bright discrete auroras throughout the sky. In the diffuse auroral zone, the variations in the luminosity intensity with a period of 6–7 min were observed after SC. Auroral and geomagnetic field pulsations are closely correlated. During the quiet period before SC, sunward convection was concentrated in the soft precipitation region in the form of jets located in the vicinity of auroral arcs. After SC, considerable sunward convection was observed in the diffuse auroral zone. Peaks of the upward ion drift velocity were registered in the vicinity of auroral arcs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. T. Afanas’eva, S. N. Kuznetsov, and O. M. Raspopov, “On the Relation between Irregular Electron Fluxes in the Magnetosphere and Geomagnetic Pulsations,” Issled. Geomagn. Aeron. Avroral’noi Zony, 3–11 (1973).

  2. K. B. Baker and S. Wing, “A New Magnetic Coordinate System for Conjugate Studies at High Latitudes,” J. Geophys. Res. 94, 9139–9143 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Boudouridis, E. Zesta, L. R. Lyons, et al., “Effect of Solar Wind Pressure Pulses on the Size and Strength of the Auroral Oval,” J. Geophys. Res. 108A, A009373 (2003).

  4. S. A. Chernous, V. G. Vorobjev, V. R. Tagirov, et al., “TV and Photometric Observations of the Transition Region between Discrete Arcs and Pulsations in Daytime Auroras,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium “Polar Geomagnetic Phenomena on May 25–31, 1986,” Suzdal, 1989, pp. 46–50.

  5. L. D. Craven, L. A. Frank, C. T. Russell, et al., Solar Wind—Magnetosphere Coupling, Ed. by Y. Kamide and J. P. Slavin (Terra Sci., Tokyo, 1986), pp. 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Egeland, W. J. Burke, N. C. Maynard, et al., “Ground and Satellite Observation of Postdawn Aurorae near the Time of a Sudden Storm Commencement,” J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2095–2108 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. Engebretson, W. J. Hughes, J. L. Alford, et al., “Magnetometer Array for Cusp and Cleft Studies of the Spatial Extent of Broadband ULF Magnetic Pulsations at Cusp/Cleft Latitudes,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 19 371–19 386 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. J. Farrugia, L. F. Burlaga, V. A. Osherovich, et al., “A Study of an Expanding Interplanetary Cloud and Its Interaction with the Earth’s Magnetosphere: The Interplanetary Aspect,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 7621–7632 (1993a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. J. Farrugia, M. P. Freeman, L. F. Burlaga, et al., “The Earth’s Magnetosphere Under Continued Forcing: Substorm Activity during the Passage of an Interplanetary Magnetic Cloud,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 7657–7671 (1993b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. P. Freeman, C. J. Farrugia, L. F. Burlaga, et al., “The Interaction of a Magnetic Cloud with the Earth: Ionospheric Convection in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere for a Wide Range of Quasi-Steady Interplanetary Magnetic Field Conditions,” J. Geophys. Res. 98, 7633–7656 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. H. Glassmeier and C. Heppner, “Traveling Magnetospheric Convection Twin-Vortices: Another Case Study, Global Characteristics, and Model,” J. Geophys. Res. 97, 3977–3992 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Haerendel, “Acceleration from Field-Aligned Potential Drops,” Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 90, 765–774 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. R. Judge, “Electron Excitation and Auroral Emission Parameters,” Planet. Space Sci. 20, 2081–2092 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Kaneda, S. Kukubun, T. Oguti, and T. Nagata, “Auroral Radar Echoes Associated with Pc5,” Rep. Ionos. Space Sci. Japan 18(3), 214–217 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kozlovsky, V. Safargaleev, N. Ostgard, et al., “On the Motion of Dayside Auroras Caused by a Solar Wind Pressure,” Ann. Geophys. 23, 509–521 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu. P. Maltsev, Lectures on Magnetospheric—Ionospheric Physics, Ed. by V. G. Pivovarov (KNTs PGI, Apatity, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu. P. Maltsev and I. V. Golovchanskaya, “Multi-Jet Structure of Magnetospheric Convection and Formation of Discrete Auroral Arcs,” in The Third Internetinoal Conference on Substorms, Versailles, France on May 12–17, 1996, pp. 117–119.

  18. M. Meurant, J.-C. Gerard, C. Blockx, et al., “Propagation of Electron and Proton Shock-Induced Aurora and the Role of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field and Solar Wind,” J. Geophys. Res. 109A, A010453 (2004).

  19. K. V. Ogilvie and R. J. Fitzenreiter, “The Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at the Magnetopause and Inner Boundary Layer Surface,” J. Geophys. Res. 94, 15 113–15 123 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. J. Opgenoorth, I. Haggstrom, P. J. S. Williams, and G. O. L. Jones, “Regions of Strongly Enhanced Perpendicular Electric Fields Adjacent to Auroral Arcs,” J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 52, 449–458 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. V. G. Roldugin, “SC and SI Optical Effects at Loparskaya and Mirny Observatories,” Geomagn. Aeron. 14(1), 93–95 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. I. Shumilov, O. M. Raspopov, E. A. Klasatkina, et al., “Dynamics of Particle Precipitation in the Polar Cap during SC: Studying a Coherent Event,” Geomagn. Aeron. 31(4), 591–600 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Song and R. L. Lysak, “Alfvénnon Driven Reconnection and Direct Generation of Field-Aligned Current,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 1755–1758 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. J. Southwood and M. G. Kivelson, “The Magnetohydrodynamic Response of the Magnetospheric Cavity to Changes in Solar Wind Pressure,” J. Geophys. Res. 85, 2301–2309 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. E. Timofeev, M. K. Vallinkoski, T. V. Kozelova, et al., “Systematic of Arc-Associated Electric Fields and Currents as Inferred from Radar Backscatter Measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 61, 112–137 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. T. Tsurutani, J. K. Arballo, G. S. Lakhina, et al., “Plasma Waves in the Dayside Polar Cap Boundary Layer: Bipolar and Monopolar Electric Pulses and Whistler Mode Waves,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4171–4120 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. A. Volkov and Yu. P. Maltsev, “Flute Instability of the Plasma Sheet Inner Boundary,” Geomagn. Aeron. 26(5), 798–801 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. G. Vorobjev, “Auroral Effects Related to SC,” Geomagn. Aeron. 14(1), 90–92 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  29. V. G. Vorobjev, “Behavior of Daytime Auroras after SC and SI,” in Structure of the Magnetic—Ionospheric and Auroral Disturbances, Ed. by G. A. Loginov et al. (Nauka, Leningrad, 1977), pp. 126–132 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. V. G. Vorobjev, O. I. Yagodkina, D. G. Sibeck, and P. Newell, “Daytime High-Latitude Auroral Pulsations: Some Morphological Featured and the Region of the Magnetospheric Source,” J. Geophys. Res. 104, 10 135–10 144 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. I. Yagodkina, V. G. Vorobjev, and S. V. Leontyev, “Structure of Pulsating Auroras in the Dayside Sector and Their Morphological Characteristics,” Geomagn. Aeron. 29(3), 411–416 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. X.-Y. Zhou and B. T. Tsurutani, “Rapid Intensification and Prorogation of the Dayside Aurora: Large-Scale Interplanetary Pressure Pulses (Fast Shocks),” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1097–1100 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. X.-Y. Zhou, R. J. Strangeway, P. C. Anderson, et al., “Shock Aurora: FAST and DMSP Observation,” J. Geophys. Res. 108A, A009701 (2003).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.G. Vorobjev, V.B. Belakhovsky, O.I. Yagodkina, V.K. Roldugin, M.R. Hairston 2008, published in Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiya, 2008, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 162–172.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vorobjev, V.G., Belakhovsky, V.B., Yagodkina, O.I. et al. Features of morning-time auroras during SC. Geomagn. Aeron. 48, 154–164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208020047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793208020047

PACS numbers

Navigation