Abstract—
New data on roméite (CaNa)Sb2O6F solubility in the NaF–H2O system of P–Q type have been obtained within a wide range of sodium fluoride concentrations (from 0 to 25 wt % NaF). The concentration of antimony, in equilibrium with roméite and fluorite, in the range of NaF concentrations from 1 to 8 mol kg–1 H2O (25 wt % NaF), is in the range of 0.02–0.2 mol kg–1 H2O. According to the data, the concentration of antimony in phases L1 and L2 in the region of fluid immiscibility of the NaF–H2O system at 800°C, 200 MPa and fO2 = 50 Pa, specified by the Cu2O–CuO buffer, is 0.4 and 2.1 wt % Sb, respectively. Our experiments were the first ever to produce skeletal fluorite crystals and the intermetallic compound Pt5Sb, which belongs the hexagonal crystal system and has the following lattice parameters (LP): a = b = 4.56(4) Å, c = 4.229(2) Å, and α = β = 90°, γ = 120°. Pentaplatinum antimonide was formed on the inner surface of the Pt capsules at 800°C, Р = 200 MPa, and fO2 ≤ 10–3.47 Pa (Cu–Cu2O buffer) in experiments on the incongruent dissolution of roméite, which causes a sharp decrease (more than 1000 times) in antimony concentration in the solution.
REFERENCES
N. N. Akinfiev, V. S. Korzhinskaya, N. P. Kotova, A. F. Redkin, and A. V. Zotov, “Niobium and tantalum in hydrothermal fluids: thermodynamic description of hydroxide and hydroxofluoride complexes,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 280, 102–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.04.009
J. Amador, E. Gutierrez-Puebla, M. A. Monge, I. Rasines, and C. Ruiz-Valero, “Diantimony tetraoxides revisited,” Inorg. Chem. 27, 1367–1370 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00281a011
D. Atencio, M. E. Ciriotti, and M. B. Andrade, “Fluorcalcioroméite, (Ca,Na)2Sb25+(O,OH)6F, a new roméite–group mineral from Starlera mine, Ferrera, Grischun, Switzerland: description and crystal structure,” Mineral. Mag. 77 (4), 467–473 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.077.4.06
C. F. Baes, Jr. and R. E. Mesmer, The Hydrolysis of Cations (John Wiley–Interscience, New York, 1976).
S. Bahfenne and R. L. Frost, “Raman spectroscopic study of the antimonite mineral romeite,” Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 75 (2), 637–639 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2009.11.031
J. Brugger, R. Gieré, S. Graeser, and N. Melsser, “The crystal chemistry of roméite,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 127 (1–2), 136–146 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004100050271
C. A. Cody, L. DiCarlo, and R. K. Darlington, “Vibrational and thermal study of 1007 antimony oxides,” Inorg. Chem. 18 (6), 1572–1576 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50196a036
G. A. Diemar, M. Filella, P. Leverett, and P. A. Williams, “Dispersion of antimony from oxidizing ore deposits,” Pure Appl. Chem. 81 (9), 1547–1553 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1351/pac-con-08-10-21
P. Durussel and P. Feschotte, “Les systèmes binaires Pd–Sb et Pt–Sb,” J. Alloys Compd. 176 (1), 173–181 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(91)90023-O
O. V. Eremin, G. A. Yurgenson, M. A. Solodukhina, and E. S. Epova, “Supergene antimony and bismuth minerals: methods of estimation of their Gibbs standard potentials,” in Mineralogy of Technogenesis–2018 (Ural’sk. Otd. RAN, Yekaterinburg, 2018), pp. 103–131 [in Russian].
M. Filella and P. M. May, “Computer simulation of the low-molecular-weight inorganic species distribution of antimony(III) and antimony(V) in natural waters,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 67 (21), 4013–4031 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00095-4
K. H. Gayer and A. B. Garrett, “The equilibria of antimonous oxide (rhombic)in dilute solutions of hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide at 25°C,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74 (9), 2353–2354 (1952). https://doi.org/10 (1952).1021/ja01129a051
H. Hashimoto, T. Nishimura, and Umetsu Y. and, “Hydrolysis of antimony(III)–hydrochloric acid solution at 25°C. Mater. Trans. 44 (8), 1624–1629 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.44.1624
I. Herath, M. Vithanage, and J. Bundschuh, “Antimony as a global dilemma: geochemistry, mobility, fate and transport,” Environ. Pollut. 223, 545–559 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.057
V. P. Itkin and C. B. Alcock, “The Pt–Sb (platinum–antimony) system,” J. Phase Equilib. 17, 356–361 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665564
W.-S. Kim, “Phases and phase equilibria of the Pt–Sb system,” Korean J. Cryst. 4 (1), 18–24 (1993).
W.-S. Kim and G. Y. Chao, “Phase relations in the system Pt–Sb–Te,” Can. Mineral. 28, 675–685 (1990).
R. V. Kuzhuget, Extended Abstract of Candidate’s Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Kyzyl, 2014).
J. Liu, Y. Zhang, and C. Guo, “Thermodynamic assessment of the Pt–Sb system,” Int. J. Nonferrous Metallurgy. 2, 95–99 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4236/ijnm.2013.23013
A. F. Redkin, N. P. Kotova, and Yu. B. Shapovalov, “Liquid immiscibility in the system NaF–H2O at 800°S and 200–230 MPa and its effect on the microlite solubility,” J. Solution Chem. 44 (10), 2008–2026 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-015-0394-1
A. F. Redkin, N. P. Kotova, and Yu. B. Shapovalov, “Liquid immiscibility in the system NaF–H2O and microlite solubility at 800°C,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 469 (1), 722–727 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X16070151
A. F. Redkin, N. P. Kotova, Yu. B. Shapovalov, and V. I. Velichkin, “Experimental study and thermodynamic modeling of niobium, tantalum, and uranium behaviour in supercritical fluoride hydrothermal solutions,” In: Solution Chemistry Advances in Research and Applications, Ed by Yongliang Xiong (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2018), pp. 1–46.
A. F. Redkin, N. P. Kotova, and Yu. B. Shapovalov, “Pyrochlore solubility in NaF solutions at 800°C and p = 170–230 MPa,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 507 (1), 887–890 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X22700349
R. A. Robie, B. S. Hemingway, and J. R. Fisher, “Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105 pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures,” US Geol Surv Bull 1452, 456 p (1978).
A. Timofeev, A. A. Migdisov, and A. E. Williams-Jones, “An experimental study of the solubility and speciation of niobium in fluoride–bearing aqueous solutions at elevated temperature,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 158, 103–111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.02.015
A. R. Tourky and A. A. Mousa, “Studies of some metal electrodes. Part V. The amphoteric properties of antimony tri- and pent–oxide,” J. Chem. Soc., 759–763 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9480000759
A. V. Zotov, N. D. Shikina, and N. N. Akinfiev, “Thermodynamic properties of the Sb(III) hydroxide complex Sb(OH)3(aq) at hydrothermal conditions,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67 (10), 1821–1836 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)01281-4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank N.A. Drozhzhina (Korzhinskii Institute of Experimental Mineralogy, Russian Academy of Sciences) for XRD analyses of the solid experimental products, Dr. V.K. Karandashev (Institute of Problems of the Technologies of Microelectronics and Superpure Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences) and Dr. A.Yu. Bychkov (Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University) for ICP analyses of solutions after the experiments. We are thankful to the reviewers for discussion and valuable comments and to the scientific editor O.A. Lukanin and the editors of the journal for attention to this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20–05–00307a, and the Fundamental Research Program in the Russian Federation, project FMUF–2022-0003. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by E. Kurdyukov
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redkin, A.F., Kotova, N.P., Shapovalov, Y.B. et al. Roméite Solubility in the Fluid Immiscibility Region of the NaF–H2O System at 800°C, 200 MPa. Geochem. Int. 62, 384–392 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702923700155
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702923700155