Skip to main content
Log in

Geochemical trends of gabbro and granites in the Urals: Evidence of the evolutionary history of the mobile belt

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Principal geochemical features of gabbro and granites in the Urals, the two dominant rock groups of cotectic composition, most adequately reflect the dependences of the composition of the rocks on geological environment, which varied during the evolution of the orogen. The main geochemical trend of the gabbroids is proved to have an age coordinate and was controlled by the progressively more intense metasomatic modification of the mantle wedge as the major source of mafic magmas. The trend reflects the process that can be provisionally defined as “continentalization”. The gabbroids older than 380 Ma tend to plot within the composition field of the oceanic crust (roughly corresponding to N-MORB), whereas younger gabbroids (whose dominant mafic mineral is hornblende) plot within the field of continental mafic rocks. The behavior of such lithophile elements as K and Rb, whose concentrations increase in the course of rock evolution, unambiguously testifies that the trend corresponds to the evolution of the rocks from mafic to acid with time. During the “continentalization” of the mobile belt, the fertility of the magmatic source of the mafic rocks (mantle wedge) increased because of the progressively enhanced metasomatism of the wedge by fluid. Much of this fluid was generated in the subduction zone via the dehydration of hydroxyl-bearing minerals. In the Late Devonian, the dominant source of the fluid was amphibole in amphibolites (metamorphosed basites) and serpentine, and later the relative role of sediments involved in the subduction zone increased. The age trend is almost not reflected in the geochemistry of the granites, and their major geochemical trend can be defined as spatial. The obvious geochemical specifics of the Permian collisional granites in the northwestern and southeastern megablocks were controlled by compositional variations in the source material. Along with the newly-formed crust, the magmatic sources of granites in the northwestern megablock contained much rocks of the Mesoproterozoic granite–gneiss basement, whereas the sources of granites in the southeastern megablock was dominated by orthogneisses, which are metamorphic rocks of Paleozoic gabbro–tonalite–granodiorite–granite series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. K. Blackman, B. Ildefouse, B. E. John, Y. Ohara, D. J. Miller, C. J. MacLeod, and the Expedition 304/305 Scientists, “Proceedings of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program,” 304–305 (2006). doi: 10.2204/iodpproc.304305103.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. A. Bogatikov, L. V. Kosareva, and E. V. Sharkov, Average Chemical Compositions of Igneous Rocks (Nedra, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Elburg, M. van Bercen, J. Hoogewerff, J. Foden, P. Vroon, I. Zulkarnain, and A. Nasution, “Geochemical trends across an arc–continent collision zone: magma sources and slab–wedge transfer processes below the Pantar Strait volcanoes, Indonesia,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66 (15), 2771–2789 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, “The main features of the Uralian Paleozoic magmatism and the Epioceanic nature of the Orogen,” Miner. Petrol. 107 (1), 39–52 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater and A. A. Krasnobaev, “Obduction magmatism and conjugate migmatization (by the example of the Urals)” Litosfera, No. 3, 66–85(2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, V. V. Kholodnov, A. A. Kremenetsky, A. A. Krasnobaev, N. S. Borodina, E. A. Zin’kova, and S. V. Pribavkin, “Au-bearing gabbro–tonalite–granodiorite–granite plutons of the Urals: age, geochemistry, and magmatic and ore evolution,” Geol. Ore Deposits 52 (1), 58–76 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, Petrology of Major Associations of Intrusive Rocks (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, “Granitoid magmatism and formation of the continental crust during evolution of the Ural orogen,” Litosfera, No. 1, 62–85 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, “Lithotectonic zoning of the Urals and magmatism,” Geotektonika, No. 6, 3–17 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, “Magmatism in the epochs of Ural paleocean closure and mobile belt development: composition, distinctive evolutionary features, and sources,” Petrology 21 (2), 181–201 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. B. Fershtater, N. S. Borodina, N. G. Soloshenko, and M.V. Streletskaya, “Rb–Sr age of orthogneisses—protolith of Late Paleozoic granites (Kochkar anticlinorum, South Urals),” in Ezhegodnik-2013. Tr. Inst. Geol. Geokhim., 161, 357–361 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Grove, S. W. Parman, S. A. Bowring, R. C. Price, and M. B. Baker “The role of an H2O-rich fluid component in the generation of primitive basaltic andesites and andesites from the Mt. Shasta region, N. California,” Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 142, 376–396 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. H. Jones, “Temperatureand pressure-independent correlations of olivine/liquid partition coefficients and their application to trace element partitioning,” Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 88, 126–132 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Kogiso, Y. Tatsumi, and S. Nakano, “Trace element transport during dehydration processes in the subducted oceanic crust. 1. Experiments and implications for the origin of ocean island basalts,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 148, 193–205 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Krasnobaev, F. Bea, G. B. Feshtater, and P. Montero, “Zircon geochronology of the Murza Metamorphic Complex (Middle Urals),” Dokl. Earth Sci. 404 (3), 1101–1104 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Krasnobaev, F. Bea, G. B. Feshtater, and P. Montero, “Zircons and the problem of Precambrian in the Main Granite Belt of the Urals: evidence from the Kozhubaevo Metamorphic Complex,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 408 (3), 612–616 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Kremenetsky, A. F. Morozov, G. B. Fershtater, and S. M. Beskin, “Innovation technology of reestimation of the resource potential of regional geological structures by the example of the “Commercial Urals–Polar Urals” project,” Razvedka Okhr. Nedr, No. 5, 36–41 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Ya. Levin, B. M. Ronenson, V. S. Samkov, I. A. Levina, N. S. Sergeev, and A. P. Kiselev, “Alkaline Carbonatite Complexes of the Urals (Uralgeolkom, Yekaterinburg, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Marske, M. O. Garcia, A. J. Pietruszka, and F. A. Trusdell, “Geochemistry of Southern Pagan island lavas, Mariana arc: the role of subduction zone processes,” Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 162, 231–252 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Pearce, “Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust,” Lithos. 100, 14–48 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Rapoport and N. I. Ruditsa, “Heterogeneities of the Earth’s crust and upper mantle of the Urals,” Geol. Metallogen. Urala, Ed. by K. K. Zoloeva (MPR RF, Yekateriburg, 1998), pp, 69–82 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Tatsumi and T. Kogiso, “Trace element transport during dehydration processes in the subducted oceanic crust. 2. Origin of chemical and physical characteristics in arc magmatism,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 148, 207–221 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. K. Zoloev, V. Ya. Levin, S. I. Mormil’, and G. Yu. Shardakova, Metallogeny and Deposits of Trace Metals, Molybdenum, and Tungsten of the Urals (UKSE, Yekaterinburg, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. B. Fershtater.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.B. Fershtater, 2015, published in Geokhimiya, 2015, No. 12, pp. 1094–1109

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fershtater, G.B. Geochemical trends of gabbro and granites in the Urals: Evidence of the evolutionary history of the mobile belt. Geochem. Int. 53, 1064–1079 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702915120034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702915120034

Keywords

Navigation