Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification of electrical resistance to estimate NaCl behavior in a column under controlled conditions

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate prediction of solute transport processes in surface water and its underlying bed is an important task not only for proper management of the surface water but also for pollution control in these water bodies. Key issue in this task is an estimation of parameters as diffusion coefficient and velocity for solute transport both in water body and in the underlying bed. This estimation would greatly help us to understand the deposition and release mechanism of solute across the water-bed interface. In this study, a column experiment was conducted in laboratory to estimate the velocity and diffusion coefficient of sodium chloride (NaCl) in water body and underlying sand layer (bed). The column used with a diameter of 30 cm and a height of 100 cm, was filled with sand at the lower half part and water at the upper half part. Total 64 stainless steel electrodes were installed on its surface around. The sodium chloride solution was injected from the top of the column, and electrical resistance between electrodes was monitored for 71 h. Then the dimensionless resistance breakthrough curve was fitted with one dimensional analytic solution for solute transport and the related diffusion coefficient and velocity parameters were estimated. The results show that the NaCl transport velocity was high in the water body but extremely low in the underlying sand layer (bed). The diffusion coefficient estimated in sand layer coincides with those reported well. This indicates that the electrical resistance based solute transport parameter estimation method is not only effective but also has an advantage of multipoints monitoring. This is useful both in mapping solute transport parameter for solute transport process analysis and in providing parameter input for solute transport numerical modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Beklioglu, O. Ince, and I. Tuzun, “Restoration of the eutrophic Lake Eymir, Turkey, by biomanipulation after a major external nutrient control,” Hydrobiologia 490, 93–105 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Klapper, “Technologies for lake restoration,” J. Limnology 62, 73–90 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Water in a Changing World. Earthscan (UNESCO, 2009).

  4. T. Bunsri, M. Sivakumar, and D. Hagare, “Influence of dispersion on transport of tracer through unsaturated porous media,” J. App. Fluid Mechanics 1(2), 37–44 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford. 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. W. Gehar, C. Welty, and K. R. Rehfeldt, “A critical review of data on field scale dispersion in aquifers,” Water Resour. Res. 28(7), 1955–1974 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Nutzmann, S. Maciejewski, and K. Joswig, “Estimation of water saturation dependence of dispersion in unsaturated porous media: experiment and modeling analysis,” Adv. Water Resour. 25, 555–567 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Schnoor, Environmental Modeling: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Water, Air and Soil (Wiley Interscience Publication, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Toride, F. J. Leij, and M. Th. van Genuchten, “The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments,” Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, California, Res. Rep. No. 137, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Toride, M. Inoue and F. J. Leiji, “Hydrodynamic dispersion in unsaturated dune sand,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 703–712 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Th. Van Genuchten, “Non-equilibrium transport parameters from miscible displacement experiments,” Res. Rep. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-SEA-ARS. Riverside. CA, No. 119 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. Fetter, Contaminant Hydrogeology 2nd ed, (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Wang, Describing and Predicting Breakthrough Curves for non-Reactive Solute Transport in Statistically Homogeneous Porous Media (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. D. Jackson, K. J. Northmore, P. I. Meldrum, D. A. Gunn, J. R. Hallam, J. Wambura, B. Wangusi, and G. Ogutu, “Non-invasive moisture monitoring within an earth embankment-a precursor to failure,” NDT & E International, 35(2), 107–115 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kemna, J. Vanderborght, B. Kulessa, and H. Vereecken, “Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity (ERT) tomography and equivalent transport models,” J. Hydrol. 267, 125–165 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Menand and A. W. Woods, “Dispersion, scale, and time dependence of mixing zones under gravitationally stable and unstable displacements in porous media,” Water Resour. Res. 41(5), (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Lekmine, M. Pessel, and H. Auradou, “2009. 2D electrical resistivity tomography surveys optimisation of solutes transports in porous media,” Archeo Sciences, No. 33, 309–312 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Yixin, Z. Zhichu, X. Ling-an, L. Xiaoping, and W. Yingxiang, “Application of electrical resistance tomography system to monitor gas/liquid two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe,” Flow Meas. Instrum. 12, 259–265 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. E. Archie, “The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics,” J. Petrol. Technol. Tech. Publ, No. 5, (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. D. Rhoades, P. J. Shouse, W. J. Alves, N. A. Manteghi, and S. M. Lesch, “Determining soil salinity from soil electrical conductivity using different models and estimates,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54(1), 49–54 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. D. Rhoades, B. L. Waggoner, P. J. Shouse, and W. J. Alves, “Determining soil salinity from soil and soil-paste electrical conductivities: sensitivity analysis of models,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53(2), 1368–1374 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. W. Marquardt, “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters,” J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 2, 431–441 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, New Work, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Th. Van Genuchten and J. C. Parker, “Boundary conditions for displacement experiments through short laboratory soil columns,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 703–708 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haibo Jin, Yicheng Lian, Suohe Yang, Guangxiang He, and Zhiwu Guo, “The parameters measurement of air-water two phase flow using the electrical resistance tomography (ERT) technique in a bubble column,” Flow Meas. Instrum. 31, 55–60 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. Lapidus and N. R. Amundson, “Mathematics of adsorption in beds. VI. The effects of longitudinal diffusion in ion exchange and chromatographic columns,” J. Phys. Chem. 56(8), 984–988 (1952). DOI: 10.1021/j150500a014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Ogata and R. B. Banks, “A solution of the differential equation of longitudinal dispersion in porous media,” U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. No. 411-A, (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. P. Sauty, “An analysis of hydrodispersive transfer in aquifers,” Water Res. Res. 16(1), 145–158 (1980). DOI: 10.1029/WR016i001p00145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Wang, H. Zhan, and Z. Tang, “A New Parameter Estimation Method for Solute Transport in a Column,” Ground Water 51(5), 714–722 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. F. Helfferich, “In ion exchange,” in A Series of Advances, Ed. by J. A. Marinsky (New York, Marcel Dekker, 1966), pp. 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi You Zhou.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junejo, S.A., Zhou, Q.Y., Talpur, M.A. et al. Quantification of electrical resistance to estimate NaCl behavior in a column under controlled conditions. Geochem. Int. 52, 794–804 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702914090055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702914090055

Keywords

Navigation