Skip to main content

Investigation of NACA2412 Airfoil Blade for Modelling, Simulation, and Experimental Validation

Abstract

Rapidly growing needs for alternate fuels created an option for the sources like wind turbines. The choice of the airfoil blade for turbulence modelling, turbulence, and experimental validation is one of the most demanding phenomena required by researchers. Various airfoil blades have been presented earlier to evaluate turbulence models. The K–ω SST model is the most suitable for the NACA0012 airfoil blade and the Spalart–Allmaras model for the NACA0015 airfoil blade. In present study, the K–ε realizable model is adopted for the NACA2412 airfoil blade. The investigation of the stall conditions which have a notable variation between 12.5° < α < 15° has been performed. The values of the lift and drag coefficients are the most important features which are evaluated at various angles of attack. The experimental model of the NACA2412 airfoil blade is validated with the Xfoil predictions and the computational fluid dynamics results at Re = 3 × 105.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

REFERENCES

  1. Guvernyuk, S.V. and Dynnikova, G.Y., Modelling the flow past an oscillating airfoil by the method of viscous vortex domains, Fluid Dyn., 2007, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–11.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Şahin, İ. and Acir, A., Numerical and experimental investigations of lift and drag performances of NACA0015 wind turbine airfoil, Int. J. Mater., Mech. Manufact., 2015, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhury, A.M., Akimoto, H., and Hara, Y.J.R.E., Comparative CFD analysis of vertical axis wind turbine in upright and tilted configuration, Renewable Energy, 2016, vol. 85, pp. 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aleksin, V.A., Simulation of the effect of the freestream turbulence parameters on heat transfer in an unsteady boundary layer, Fluid Dyn., 2003, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schubel, P.J. and Crossley, R.J., Wind turbine blade design, Energies, 2012, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 3425–3449. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5093425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wenehenubun, F., Saputra, A., and Sutanto, H., An experimental study on the performance of Savonius wind turbines related with the number of blades, 2015, vol. 68, pp. 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.259

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Brøndsted, P., Lilholt. H., and Lystrup, A., Composite materials for wind power turbine blades, Ann. Rev. Mater. Res., 2005, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 505–538. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.35.100303.110641

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sunny, K.A. and Kumar, N.M., Vertical axis wind turbine: Aerodynamic modelling and its testing in wind tunnel, Procedia Computer Science, 2016, vol. 93, pp. 1017–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhat, S.S. and Govardhan, R.N., Stall flutter of NACA 0012 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluids Struct., 2013, vol. 41, pp. 166–174.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tools, A., NACA 0012 airfoil, 2014, ONLINE.

  11. Hameed, M.S. and Afaq, S.K., Design and analysis of a straight bladed vertical axis wind turbine blade using analytical and numerical techniques, Ocean Eng., 2013, vol. 57, pp. 248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, L., Ma, Y., and Liu, L., Numerical Simulation on Aerodynamics Performance of Wind Turbine Aerofoil, in: Conf. on World Automation Congress (WAC), Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, Publisher by IEEE, 2012.

  13. Villalpando, F., Reggio, M., and Ilinca, A., Assessment of turbulence models for flow simulation around a wind turbine airfoil, Adv. Comp. Fluid Dyn. App., 2011, p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/714146

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Troolin, D., Longmire, E.K., and Lai, W., Time resolved PIV analysis of flow over a NACA0015 airfoil with Gurney flap, Exp. in Fluids, 2006, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 241–254.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srinivasan, G., Ekaterinaris, J., and McCroskey, W., Evaluation of turbulence models for unsteady flows of an oscillating airfoil, Comp. & Fluids, 1995, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 833–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garbaruk, A., Strelets, M. Kh., and Shur, M.L., Modern Approaches to Modelling Turbulence, St. Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publ., 2012.

  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_airfoil#/media/File:Airfoil_geometry.svg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Q. Mahmood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmood, S.Q., Hayat, N. Investigation of NACA2412 Airfoil Blade for Modelling, Simulation, and Experimental Validation. Fluid Dyn 57, 412–421 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462822030120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462822030120

Keywords:

  • airfoil blade
  • turbulence
  • turbulence
  • experiment
  • lift and drag coefficients
  • angle of attack
  • computational fluid dynamics