Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Thin-Airfoil Stall and Leading-Edge Stall of Oscillating Wings at Low Reynolds Number

  • Published:
Fluid Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of an oscillating flat plate and the NACA 0012 airfoil around the angle of attack (AoA) close to their static stall angle at a low Reynolds number, 3.2 × 104. The kinematic oscillatory motion is described by a sinusoidal function in which the oscillation frequency and amplitude are variable. Both experimental and numerical methods are applied in the two-dimensional space. The experiment aims at measuring the aerodynamic forces and the moment directly. For numerical simulation, the SST (Shear Stress Transport) gamma theta model is employed to solve the unsteady flow field and to compute the lift coefficients (CLs). Good qualitative agreement between the experimental and numerical results for CL is obtained, which demonstrates the feasibility of the modified RANS model in the flow transition case. In general, NACA 0012 is greatly influenced by the dynamic effect in contrast with the flat plate. For a given reduced frequency, the shape of the hysteresis loop of CL shows some distinguishing features; the process of flow reattachment of NACA 0012 is slower than that of the flat plate in the downstroke phase, so that a smooth transition of CL is observed; there are still vortices shedding from the trailing edge even at small angles of attack, which results in a local instability of CL. By studying the effects of the reduced frequency (K) and the amplitude, it is found that the AoA corresponding to the maximum CL is more sensitive to the former and the reduced pitch rate (a') is the main parameter determining the dynamic stall angle for both flat plate and NACA 0012. In addition, the results for K = 0.07 show that the lift and drag coefficients at a maximum angle of attack are close to their static values for the discussed amplitudes and wing geometries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

pivot point

c :

chord, m.

K :

reduced frequency, ωc/2U.

U :

mean wind tunnel velocity, ms−1

s :

span of the wing geometry, m

t :

blade thickness, m

α:

angle of attack, deg

ά:

reduced pitch rate, deg

α0 :

mean angle of attack, deg

α1 :

oscillation amplitude, deg

αmax :

maximum angle of attack, deg

αmaxCL :

angle of attack corresponding to the maximum lift coefficient

ω :

oscillation frequency, Hz

t :

physical time, s

τ:

dimensionless time, tc/2U.

AoA:

angle of attack, deg

AR:

aspect ratio

CL:

aerodynamic lift coefficient

CD:

aerodynamic drag coefficient

CM:

aerodynamic moment coefficient

LEV:

leading-edge vortex

Re:

Reynolds number

References

  1. G.B. McCullough and D.E. Gault, “Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed,” NASA Technical Note 2502 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.W. Ward, “The behaviour and effects of laminar separation bubbles on aerofoils in incompressible flow,” J. Aeronaut. Sci. 67 (636), 783–790 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Crimi and B. Reeves, “A method for analyzing dynamic stall,” 10th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p. 37 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.J. McCroskey, “The phenomenon of dynamic stall,” NASA Tech. Memo. 81264 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.J. McCroskey, L.W. Carr, and K.W. McAlister, “Dynamic stall experiments on oscillating airfoils,” AIAA J. 14 (1), 57–63 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K.W. McAlister, L.W. Carr, and W.J. McCroskey, “Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 0012 airfoil,” NASA Technical Paper 1100 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Wernert, W. Geissler, M. Raffel, and J. Kompenhans, “Experimental and numerical investigations of dynamic stall on a pitching airfoil,” AIAA J. 34 (5), 982–989 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.B. Linn, “Determination of average lift of a rapidly pitching airfoil,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Gerontakos, “An experimental investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil,” Dissertation, McGill University (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Krzysiak, “Experimental investigation of a dynamic stall on the oscillating NACA 0012 airfoil,” Prace Instytutu Lotnictwa, 1–52 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.P. Ellington, C. Van Den Berg, A.P. Willmott, and A.L.R. Thomas, “Leading-edge vortices in insect flight,” Nature, 384 (6610), 626 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.J. Pines and F. Bohorquez, “Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development,” J. Aircraft 43(2), 290–305 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.F. Platzer, K.D. Jones, J. Young, and J. C.S. Lai, “Flapping wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges,” AIAA J. 46 (9), 2136–2149 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Okamoto and A. Azuma, “Aerodynamic characteristics at low Reynolds number for wings of various plan-forms,” AIAA J. 49 (6), 1135–1150 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Shyy, H. Aono, C. Kang, and H. Liu, An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics (Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Mizoguchi and H. Itoh, “Effect of aspect ratio on aerodynamic characteristics of rectangular wings at low Reynolds numbers,” 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2012, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.H. Kim and J.W. Chang, “Unsteady boundary layer for a pitching airfoil at low Reynolds numbers,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24 (1), 429–440 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.H. Kim and J.W. Chang, “Low-Reynolds-number effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of a pitching NACA 0012 airfoil,” Aerospace Sci. Technol. 32 (1), 162–168 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Naderi, M. Mojtahedpoor, and A. Beiki, “Numerical investigation of non-stationary parameters on effective phenomena of a pitching airfoil at low Reynolds number,” J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 9, 2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Bangga and H. Sasongko, “Dynamic stall prediction of a pitching airfoil using an adjusted two-equation URANS turbulence model,” J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 10 (1), 1–10 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Yu, X. Amandolese, C. Fan, and Y Liu, “Experimental study and modelling of unsteady aerodynamic forces and moment on flat plate in high amplitude pitch ramp motion,” J. Fluid Mech. 846, 82–120 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. F.R. Menter, R.B. Langtry, S.R. Likki, Y.B. Suzen, P.G. Huang, and S. Völker, “A correlation-based transition model using local variables—part I: Model formulation,” J. Turbomach. 128 (3), 413–422 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R.B. Langtry, F.R. Menter, S.R. Likki, Y.B. Suzen, P.G. Huang, and S. Völker, “A correlation-based transition model using local variables—part II: Test cases and industrial applications,” J. Turbomach. 128 (3), 423–434 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Roy, Z. Huque, K. Lee, and R. Kommalapati, “Turbulence model prediction capability in 2D airfoil of NREL wind turbine blade at stall and post stall region,” J. Clean Energy Technol. 5 (6) (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Poirel, Y. Harris, and A. Benaissa, “Self-sustained aeroelastic oscillations of a NACA 0012 airfoil at low-to-moderate Reynolds numbers,” J. Fluids Structures 24 (5), 700–719 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledments

The first author thanks Prof. Xavier Amandolese for his guidance on unsteady aerodynamics during the internship in France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yadong Wu.

Additional information

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Izvestiya RAN. Mekhanika Zhidkosti i Gaza, 2019, No. 5, pp. 102–116.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, C., Wu, Y., Yu, Y. et al. Dynamic Thin-Airfoil Stall and Leading-Edge Stall of Oscillating Wings at Low Reynolds Number. Fluid Dyn 54, 691–704 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462819040128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462819040128

Keywords

Navigation