Skip to main content
Log in

The diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative characters in computer identification keys

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method for estimating the diagnostic value of characters for computer keys to biological objects is proposed. The algorithm described can be used for correct comparison of qualitative and quantitative characters. A brief review of the history of biological diagnostics is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balkovsky, B.E., “On the Ways of Increasing the Diagnostic Value of Characters Used for Identification of Plants,” Botan. Zh. 47(9), 1309–1314 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dallwitz, M.J., “A Flexible Program for Generating Identification Keys,” Syst. Zool. 23(1), 50–57 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dianov, M.B. and Lobanov, A.L., “PICKEY, a Program for Organism Identification with Interactive Use of Images,” Trudy Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk 269, 35–39 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dianov, M.B. and Lobanov, A.L., “BIKEY8-the Biological Diagnostic Software for Windows,” Trudy Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk 278, 74 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dmitriev, D.A., “3I, a New Program for Creating Internet-Accessible Interactive Keys and Taxonomic Databases and Its Application for Taxonomy of Cicadina (Homoptera),” Rus. Entomol. J. 15(3), 263–268 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gambaryan, P.P., “A Numerical Key to the Aquatic Flowering Plants of Armenia,” Biol. Zh. Armen. 28(9), 108–111 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodall, D.W., “Identification by Computer,” BioScience 18(6), 485–488 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirejtshuk, A.G., Lobanov, A.L., Smirnov, I.S., et al., “Internet-Based Keys to Biological Objects: Five Years Later,” in Internet Scientific Services: the Exaflop Future: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Supercomputers (September 19–24, 2011, Novorossiysk) (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2011), pp. 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiskin, P.Kh., Pecherskaya, I.N., and Pechersky, Yu.N., “Automated Diagnostic Search for Grape Varieties Using a Minsk-1 Computer,” Vinodel. Vinograd. SSSR, No. 1, 21–22 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lobanov, A.L., “Logical Analysis and Classification of the Existing Types of Diagnostic Keys,” Entomol. Obozr. 51(3), 668–681 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lobanov, A.L., “Estimation of the Diagnostic Value of Character Series in Computer-Oriented Multi-Entry Keys,” in Abstracts of Papers, VI Conf. of Young Sciences of Komi Republic (Syktyvkar, 1974), pp. 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lobanov, A.L., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Leningrad, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lobanov, A.L., “Computer Keys in Biology: the Results of 30 Years of Evolution,” in Computer Databases in Botanical Research: Collected Papers (St. Petersburg, 1997), pp. 51–55 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lobanov, A.L. and Dianov, M.B., “The Interactive Computer Diagnostic System BIKEY and the Possibili ties of Its Use in Entomology,” Entomol. Obozr. 73(2), 465–478 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lobanov, A.L. and Dianov, M.B., The World of Beetles [Wir Bestimmen Käfer]: a CD-ROM and a Brief Manual (Dialobis Edition, Berlin, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lobanov, A.L. and Ryss, A.Yu., “Computer Identification Systems in Zoology and Botany: the Present State and Prospects,” Trudy Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk 278, 17–19 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lopatin, I.K. and Dovgailo, K.E., Leaf Beetles of the Genus Cryptocephalus (Chrysomelidae) of the Palaearctic: a Key to 398 Species and a Lysandra Database on a CD-ROM (Minsk, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, G.A., “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two,” Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–92 (1956).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morse, L.E., “Construction of Identification Keys by Computer,” Amer. J. Botan. 55(6), 737 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pankhurst, R.J., “A Computer Program for Generating Diagnostic Keys,” Computer J. 13(2), 145–151 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pankhurst, R.J., Biological Identification with Computers (Academic Press, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pankhurst, R.J., Biological Identification. The Principles and Practice of Identification Methods in Biology (Edward Arnold, London, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ryss, A. and Lobanov, A., “Principles of Taxonomic Identification Illustrated on Nematode Computer Key,” Proc. Zool. Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci. 280, 22–23 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smirnov, I.S. and Lobanov, A.L., “The Computer Key to Brittle Stars as a Taxonomic Database,” Byul. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir. Otdel. Geol. 72(1), 87–88 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smirnov, I., Lobanov, A.L., and Dianov, M.B., “Creation of Computer Picture Identification Key for the Arctic Ophiuroids,” in Program and Abstracts of the 9th Int. Echinoderm Conf., August 5 to 9, 1996, San Francisco, California (San Francisco, 1996), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vakhitov, A.T., Granichin, O.N., Kirejtshuk, A.G., and Lobanov, A.L., “Minimum-Length Questionary Algorithms for an Internet-Based Biological Key and Their Implementation,” in Internet Scientific Services: Proc. of All-Russian Conf. Dedicated to the 15th Anniversary of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (September 24–29, 2007, Novorossiysk) (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2007), pp. 293–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Lobanov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.L. Lobanov, 2015, published in Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2015, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 197–202.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lobanov, A.L. The diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative characters in computer identification keys. Entmol. Rev. 95, 285–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873815020128

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873815020128

Keywords

Navigation