Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Congruence between comparative morphology and molecular phylogenies: Evolution of the male genital skeletal/muscular system in the subtribe Polyommatina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae)

  • Published:
Entomological Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The skeleton and musculature of male genitalia were studied in species of a model butterfly group (subtribe Polyommatina, Lycaenidae). In total, we analyzed 45 species of the tribe Polyommatini most of which were previously used in the molecular phylogenetic study (Talavera et al., 2013). The studied morphological characters were mapped on the molecular trees, which allowed us to reveal trends of morphological changes and to estimate the age of their origin. As a result, chronology of evolution of skeleton and musculature traits was established. It was shown that periods of slow morphological evolution alternated in the subtribe Polyommatina with those of a high rate of origin of new traits. For example, topography of the intravalvar muscles has not changed for 26 MY preserving their initial fan-shaped attachment. The evolution of intravalvar muscles started 10 MYA, proceeded slowly during the first 5 MY, and then accelerated during the last 5 MY resulting in the extensive splitting of the musculature in most monophyletic lineages. Mapping the morphological characters on the phylogeny demonstrated that the rates of skeleton and muscle evolution within the skeleton/musculature apparatus were different. In most cases the intravalvar musculature evolved much faster than the skeleton. The cladistic interpretation of states of morphological traits was found to be consistent with phylogenetic reconstructions based on analysis of multiple molecular markers. Moreover, morphological synapomorphies were found for the lineages Alpherakya + Glabroculus and Aricia + (Alpherakya + Glabroculus), which had low statistical support in molecular phylogenetic analysis. Additionally, in some cases molecular studies helped to reveal trends in the evolution of morphological traits. For example, the unpaired uncus and the compact juxta are not plesiomorphic for Cupidina as previously thought; instead, they were shown to have evolved secondarily within this subtribe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bálint, Z. and Johnson, K., “Reformation of the Polyommatus Section with Taxonomic and Biogeographic Overview (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatini),” Neue Entomol. Nachr. 40, 1–68 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drummond, A.J. and Rambaut, A., “BEAST: Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis by Sampling Trees,” BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214 (2007).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eliot, J., “The Higher Classification of the Lycaenidae: a Tentative Arrangement,” Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Entomol. Ser. 28(6), 373–505 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kandul, N.P., Lukhtanov, V.A., Dantchenko, A.V., et al., “Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Inferred from mtDNA Sequences of COI and COII and Nuclear Sequences of EF1-α: Karyotype Diversification and Species Radiation,” Syst. Biol. 53, 278–298 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuznetzov, V.I., and Stekolnikov, A.A., “Evolution of Male Genital Skeleton and Muscles in the Families Riodinidae and Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera),” Entomol. Obozr. 77(2), 443–461 (1998) [Entomol. Rev. 78 (6), 691–705 (1998)].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuznetzov, V.I., and Stekolnikov, A.A., “New Approaches to the System of Lepidoptera of the World Fauna (Based on Abdominal Functional Morphology),” Trudy Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk 282, 1–462 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lukhtanov, V.A., “From Haeckel’s Phylogenetics and Hennig’s Cladistics to the Method of Maximum Likelihood: Advantages and Limitations of Modern and Traditional Approaches to Phylogeny Reconstruction,” Entomol. Obozr. 89(1), 133–149 (2010) [Entomol. Rev. 90 (3), 299–310 (2010)].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lukhtanov, V.A., Kandul, N.P., Plotkin, J.B., et al., “Reinforcement of Pre-Zygotic Isolation and Karyotype Evolution in Agrodiaetus Butterflies,” Nature 436(7049), 385–389 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Megens, H.-J., Van Nes, W.J., Van Moorsel, C.H.M., et al., “Molecular Phylogeny of the Oriental Butterfly Genus Arhopala (Lycaenidae, Theclinae) Inferred from Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes,” Syst. Entomol. 29(1), 115–131 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mutanen, M., Wahlberg, N., and Kaila, L., “Comprehensive Gene and Taxon Coverage Elucidates Radiation Patterns in Moths and Butterflies,” Proc. R. Soc. (B) 277, 2839–2848 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Page, R.D.M. and Holmes, E.C., Molecular Evolution: a Phylogenetic Approach (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stekolnikov, A.A., “Phylogenetic Relations within Rhopalocera Inferred from the Functional Morphology of the Genital Apparatus,” Entomol. Obozr. 46(1), 3–24 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stekolnikov, A.A., Morphological Principles of Musculature Evolution in Insects (St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stekolnikov, A.A., “Evolution of the Skeleton and Musculature of the Male Genitalia in the Family Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): II. Infratribe Polyommatina Swainson, 1827,” Entomol. Obozr. 89(3), 561–587 (2010) [Entomol. Rev. 91 (1), 37–57 (2011)].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stekolnikov, A.A. and Kuznetzov, V.I., “Evolution of Skeleton and Musculature of the Male Genitalia in the Family Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): I. The Cupido, Glaucopsyche, Lycaenopsis, and Itylos Sections,” Entomol. Obozr. 84(4), 738–760 (2005) [Entomol. Rev. 85 (9), 1055–1073 (2005)].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talavera, G., Lukhtanov, V.A., Pierce, N.E., and Vila, R., “Establishing Criteria for Higher-Level Classification Using Molecular Data: the Systematics of Polyommatus Blue Butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae),” Cladistics 29, 166–192 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiemers, M., Chromosome Differentiation and the Radiation of the Butterfly Subgenus Agrodiaetus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Polyommatus)—a Molecular Phylogenetic Approach. PhD Thesis (Univ. Bonn, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    A. A. Stekolnikov, V. A. Lukhtanov & A. I. Korzeev

  2. Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    V. A. Lukhtanov

Authors
  1. A. A. Stekolnikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. A. Lukhtanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. I. Korzeev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Stekolnikov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Stekolnikov, V.A. Lukhtanov, A.I. Korzeev, 2013, published in Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2013, Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 517–536.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stekolnikov, A.A., Lukhtanov, V.A. & Korzeev, A.I. Congruence between comparative morphology and molecular phylogenies: Evolution of the male genital skeletal/muscular system in the subtribe Polyommatina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Entmol. Rev. 94, 166–180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873814020031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873814020031

Keywords

Search

Navigation