Advertisement

Entomological Review

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 262–270 | Cite as

A problem of taxonomic status of “banana cricket” from culture of the Moscow Zoo insectarium

  • L. S. Shestakov
  • V. Yu. Vedenina
Article

Abstract

The “banana cricket” is one of the preferred laboratory objects used for studying general and applied biological problems. However, the exact identity of this form remains obscure. Correct identification of the insects maintained in culture is vital for the correct prediction of the properties of the object in question and comparative studies. Analysis of acoustic signals showed that the banana cricket from the Moscow Zoo culture did not belong to the Gryllus assimilis (F.) group as it was assumed earlier. Analysis of acoustic signals and genitalia revealed similarity between the banana cricket and insects from the culture maintained at the Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry (IEPhB, St. Petersburg), which were supposed to be Gryllus argentinus (Sauss.). The calling songs and genitalia of crickets from both cultures differed from those of G. argentinus. Thus, the banana cricket and Gryllus sp. from the IEPhB culture belong to the same species but the exact identity of that species has not been yet determined.

Keywords

Acoustic Signal Entomological Review Taxonomic Status Male Genitalia Median Lobe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berezin, M.V., Kompantseva, T.V., Tkacheva, E.Yu., and Tyurina, E.S., Recommendations on Breeding Insects to be Used as Animal Food (Moscow Zoo, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bukhvalova, M.A., “On the Synonymy of the Two Species of the Genus Arcyptera (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Russ. Entomol. J. 6(5), 3–5 (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fitzpatrick, M.J. and Gray, D.A., “Divergence between the Courtship Songs of Gryllus texensis and G. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae),” Ethology 107, 1075–1086 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heller, K.-G., “Song Evolution and Speciation in Bushcrickets,” in Insect Sounds and Communication (CRC Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton etc., 2006), pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heller, K.-G., Korsunovskaya, O.S., Sevgili, H., and Zhantiev, R.D., “Bioacoustics and Systematics of the Poecilimon heroicus Group (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae: Barbitistinae),” Eur. J. Entomol. 103, 853–865 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heller, K.-G. and Korsunovskaya, O.S., “Systematics and Bioacoustics of the Genus Lithodusa (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Including the Description of a New Species from Turkey and Comments on the Classification of the Drymadusini,” J. Orth. Res. 18(1), 5–13 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ozerski, P.V. and Shchekanov, E.E., “Relationship between Wing Movement in Flight and during Sound Emission in Some Species of Ensifera (Insecta: Orthoptera),” Trudy Russ. Entomol. O-va 80(1), 61–68 (2009).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinho Martins, L. and Zefa, E., “Contribution to the Taxonomy of Gryllus Linnaeus, 1758 in South America: Part I: Redescription of Gryllus argentinus Saussure, 1874 (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Gryllidae),” Entomol. Sci. 14, 87–93 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Popov, A.V., Acoustic Behavior and Hearing in Insects (Nauka, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ragge, D.R. and Reynolds, W.J., The Songs of the Grasshoppers and Crickets of Western Europe (Harley Books, Colchester, 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savitsky, V.Yu., “New Data on Acoustic Communication and Ecology of Grasshoppers of the Genera Eremippus and Dociostaurus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) and Notes on the Use of Bioacoustic Data in Supraspecific Taxonomy of the Subfamily Gomphocerinae,” Zool. Zh. 86(7), 813–830 (2007) [Entomol. Rev. 87 (6), 631–649 (2007)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tischechkin, D.Yu., “Calling Songs of Grasshoppers of the Genus Podismopsis (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) and Potentialities of Use of Acoustic Characters for Discrimination between Species of the Genus,” Russ. Entomol. J. 17, 259–272 (2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tokarev, Yu.S., Senderskii, I.V., Naumov, A.M., et al., “Infectious Diseases of Insects Maintained in Insectaria,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop “Invertebrates in Zoo Collections,” Moscow Zoo, 22–27.10.2007 (Moscow Zoo, Moscow, 2008), pp. 179–181 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vedenina, V.Yu., “Acoustic Communication and Sexual Selection in Orthoptera (Insecta),” Zh. Obshch. Biol. 66(4), 336–345 (2005).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vedenina, V.Yu. and Helversen, O., “A Re-Examination of the Taxonomy of the Chorthippus albomarginatus Group in Europe on the Basis of Song and Morphology (Orthoptera: Acrididae),” Tijdschr. Entomol. 152, 65–97 (2009).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagner, W.E. and Reiser, M.G., “The Importance of Calling Song and Courtship Song in Female Mate Choice in the Variable Field Cricket,” Animal Behav. 59, 1219–1226 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weissman, D.B., Walker, T.J., and Gray, D.A., “The Field Cricket Gryllus assimilis and Two New Sister Species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae),” Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 102 (3), 367–380 (2009).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willemse, F., von Helversen, O., and Od, B., “A Review of Chorthippus Species with Angled Pronotal Lateral Keels from Greece with Special Reference to Transitional Populations between Some Peloponnesian Taxa (Orthoptera, Acrididae),” Zool. Med. 83, 319–507 (2009).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yasyukevich, V.V., Rivkin, L.E., and Yasyukevich, N.V., “Cultivation of Crickets,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop “Invertebrates in Zoo Collections,” Moscow Zoo, 22–27.X.2007 (Moscow Zoo, Moscow, 2008), pp. 210–214 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhantiev, R.D., Insect Bioacoustics (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zuk, M., Rebar, D., and Scott, S.P., “Courtship Song is More Variable than Calling Song in the Field Cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus,” Anim. Behav. 76, 1065–1071 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Information Transmission ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations