Mechanical aspect of recreational load and defensive behavioral strategies in grass-dwelling insects

Abstract

The “mechanical” aspect of recreational load, i.e., the effects of anthropogenic physical contacts on the biota is discussed. The influence of the mechanical aspect of the disturbance factor upon the defensive behavior of hortobiont insects was studied by the example of two coccinellid species with different ecologies. Species-specific strategies of defensive behavior were revealed: predatory species resort to the active strategy (easy falling and immediate resumption of activity), while mycetophagous species resort to the inert strategy (“reluctant” falling and slow resumption of activity, frequently involving thanatosis). In response to mechanical impact those reactions may be considered adaptive which minimize the time and energy spent to maintain the acceptable level of safety. Under recreational load, the rational energy and time budget becomes a priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Bioindication of Pollution of Terrestrial Ecosystems (Mir, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

  2. 2.

    Cole, D.N. and Landres, P.B., “Indirect Effects of Recreation on Wildlife,” in Wildlife and Recreationists-Coexistence through Management and Research (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1995), pp. 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Coleoptera and Coleopterists. The Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1999. http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera.

  4. 4.

    Davygora, A.V., “The Disturbance Factor and Its Impact on the Tawny Eagle in the Cis-Ural Region,” Proc. Inst. Biores. Priklad. Ekol., No. 1, 107–134 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Gashev, S.N., Mammals in the System of Ecological Monitoring (by the Example of Tyumen Province (Tyumen, 2000) [in Russian].

  6. 6.

    Gorokhovskaya, E.A., Ecology: the Birth of a Science (Aleteiya, St. Petersburg, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ferran, A. and Dixon, A.F.G., “Foraging Behavior of Ladybird Larvae (Coleoptera; Coccinellidae),” Eur. J. Entomol. 90, 383–402 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hattingh, V. and Samways, M.J., “Visual and Olfactory Location of Biotopes, Prey Patches, and Individual Prey by the Ladybeetle Chilocorus nigritus,” Entomol. Exp. Appl. 75, 87–98 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lagunov, A.V., “Stratigraphy of Hortobiont Hemipterans in Ilmen Reserve (the South Urals),” in Principles and Ways of Biodiversity Protection. Proc. III All-Russia Conf. (Yoshkar-Ola, 2008), pp. 67–68.

  10. 10.

    Liddle, M., Recreation Ecology: the Ecological Impact of Outdoor Recreation and Ecotourism (Chapman & Hall, London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lin, J.-T., “Identification of Photoreceptor Locations in the Compound Eye of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae),” J. Insect Physiol. 39(7), 555–562 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nesterkov, A.V., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Yekaterinburg, 2009).

  13. 13.

    Reimers, N.F., The Main Concepts and Terms in Biology (Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Savoiskaya, G.I., The Larvae of Coccinellidae of the Fauna of the USSR (Nauka, Leningrad, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sarancha, M.A., “The Problem of Determination and Relation between the Concepts ‘Tourism’ and ‘Recreation’,” Vestnik Udmurt. Univ. Ser. Biol., No. 2, 105–118 (2009).

  16. 16.

    Schaller, M. and Nentwig, W., “Olfactory Orientation of the Seven-Spot Ladybird Beetle, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Attraction of Adults to Plants and Conspecific Females,” Eur. J. Entomol. 97, 155–159 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schmid, A., “Untersuchungen zur Attraktivität von Ackerwildkräutern für aphidophage Marienkäfer (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae),” Agrarökologie 5, 1–122 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Severtsov, A.S., “Evolution of Populations and Biocenoses,” Zool. Zh. 77(5), 517–526 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sionova, M.N., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Kaluga, 2005).

  20. 20.

    Stubbs, M., “Another Look at Prey Detection by Coccinellids,” Ecol. Entomol. 5(2), 179–182 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vladyshevskii, A.D., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Krasnoyarsk, 2004).

  22. 22.

    Zakharov, V.D., “The Influence of Recreational Load on Bird Communities in the Forests of the South Urals,” Izv. Chelyabinsk. Nauchn. Tsentra, No. 1, 141–150 (1998).

  23. 23.

    Zhigarev, I.A., Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2005).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. F. Khabibullin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.F. Khabibullin, A.F. Khabibullin, 2011, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2011, Vol. 90, No. 10, pp. 1180–1187.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khabibullin, V.F., Khabibullin, A.F. Mechanical aspect of recreational load and defensive behavioral strategies in grass-dwelling insects. Entmol. Rev. 91, 1046–1053 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873811080094

Download citation

Keywords

  • Entomological Review
  • Defensive Behavior
  • Mechanical Aspect
  • Mechanical Impact
  • Disturbance Factor