Entomological Review

, Volume 91, Issue 8, pp 1046–1053 | Cite as

Mechanical aspect of recreational load and defensive behavioral strategies in grass-dwelling insects

  • V. F. Khabibullin
  • A. F. Khabibullin


The “mechanical” aspect of recreational load, i.e., the effects of anthropogenic physical contacts on the biota is discussed. The influence of the mechanical aspect of the disturbance factor upon the defensive behavior of hortobiont insects was studied by the example of two coccinellid species with different ecologies. Species-specific strategies of defensive behavior were revealed: predatory species resort to the active strategy (easy falling and immediate resumption of activity), while mycetophagous species resort to the inert strategy (“reluctant” falling and slow resumption of activity, frequently involving thanatosis). In response to mechanical impact those reactions may be considered adaptive which minimize the time and energy spent to maintain the acceptable level of safety. Under recreational load, the rational energy and time budget becomes a priority.


Entomological Review Defensive Behavior Mechanical Aspect Mechanical Impact Disturbance Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bioindication of Pollution of Terrestrial Ecosystems (Mir, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cole, D.N. and Landres, P.B., “Indirect Effects of Recreation on Wildlife,” in Wildlife and Recreationists-Coexistence through Management and Research (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1995), pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coleoptera and Coleopterists. The Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1999.
  4. 4.
    Davygora, A.V., “The Disturbance Factor and Its Impact on the Tawny Eagle in the Cis-Ural Region,” Proc. Inst. Biores. Priklad. Ekol., No. 1, 107–134 (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gashev, S.N., Mammals in the System of Ecological Monitoring (by the Example of Tyumen Province (Tyumen, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorokhovskaya, E.A., Ecology: the Birth of a Science (Aleteiya, St. Petersburg, 2001) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferran, A. and Dixon, A.F.G., “Foraging Behavior of Ladybird Larvae (Coleoptera; Coccinellidae),” Eur. J. Entomol. 90, 383–402 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hattingh, V. and Samways, M.J., “Visual and Olfactory Location of Biotopes, Prey Patches, and Individual Prey by the Ladybeetle Chilocorus nigritus,” Entomol. Exp. Appl. 75, 87–98 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagunov, A.V., “Stratigraphy of Hortobiont Hemipterans in Ilmen Reserve (the South Urals),” in Principles and Ways of Biodiversity Protection. Proc. III All-Russia Conf. (Yoshkar-Ola, 2008), pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liddle, M., Recreation Ecology: the Ecological Impact of Outdoor Recreation and Ecotourism (Chapman & Hall, London, 1997).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, J.-T., “Identification of Photoreceptor Locations in the Compound Eye of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae),” J. Insect Physiol. 39(7), 555–562 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nesterkov, A.V., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Yekaterinburg, 2009).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reimers, N.F., The Main Concepts and Terms in Biology (Prosveshchenie, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savoiskaya, G.I., The Larvae of Coccinellidae of the Fauna of the USSR (Nauka, Leningrad, 1983) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarancha, M.A., “The Problem of Determination and Relation between the Concepts ‘Tourism’ and ‘Recreation’,” Vestnik Udmurt. Univ. Ser. Biol., No. 2, 105–118 (2009).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaller, M. and Nentwig, W., “Olfactory Orientation of the Seven-Spot Ladybird Beetle, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Attraction of Adults to Plants and Conspecific Females,” Eur. J. Entomol. 97, 155–159 (2000).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmid, A., “Untersuchungen zur Attraktivität von Ackerwildkräutern für aphidophage Marienkäfer (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae),” Agrarökologie 5, 1–122 (1992).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Severtsov, A.S., “Evolution of Populations and Biocenoses,” Zool. Zh. 77(5), 517–526 (1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sionova, M.N., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Kaluga, 2005).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stubbs, M., “Another Look at Prey Detection by Coccinellids,” Ecol. Entomol. 5(2), 179–182 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vladyshevskii, A.D., Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Krasnoyarsk, 2004).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zakharov, V.D., “The Influence of Recreational Load on Bird Communities in the Forests of the South Urals,” Izv. Chelyabinsk. Nauchn. Tsentra, No. 1, 141–150 (1998).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhigarev, I.A., Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2005).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bashkir State UniversityUfaRussia
  2. 2.Bashkir State Pedagogical UniversityUfaRussia

Personalised recommendations