Skip to main content
Log in

On the Numerical Solution of Nonconservative Hyperbolic Systems of Equations

  • NUMERICAL METHODS
  • Published:
Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Issues related to the lack of convergence in the application of formally path-conservative difference schemes for solving nonconservative hyperbolic systems of equations are numerically investigated. This problem is central in constructing well-posed difference schemes for solving this class of problems. The basic concepts of the theory of nonconservative hyperbolic systems of equations and the corresponding problems of constructing difference schemes for their solution are outlined. A variant of the HLL method is proposed that allows using an arbitrary explicitly specified path. For a model system of Burgers equations, the shock adiabates and paths corresponding to the viscous regularization of a system of a given form are explicitly calculated. The reasons for the lack of convergence of numerical solutions of exact ones in the case of incorrect application of the corresponding algorithms are analyzed. It is shown that, at least in the particular case considered, a variant of the HLL method that is formally conservative along the way gives the correct solution of the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. LeFloch, P.G. and Mohammadian, M., Why many theories of shock waves are necessary: Kinetic functions, equivalent equations, and fourth-order models, J. Comput. Phys., 2008, vol. 227, no. 8, pp. 4162–4189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Shokin, Yu.I., Metod differentsial’nogo priblizheniya (Differential Approximation Method), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Karni, S., Viscous shock profiles and primitive formulations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1992, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1592–1609.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Tadmor, E., The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. I, Math. Comput., 1987, vol. 49, pp. 91–103.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tadmor, E. and Zhong, W., Novel entropy stable schemes for 1D and 2D fluid equations, in Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics, Applications, Benzoni-Gavage, S. and Serre, D., Eds., Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2008.

  6. Castro, M.J. et al., Entropy conservative and entropy stable schemes for nonconservative hyperbolic systems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2013, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1371–1391.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. LeFloch, P. and Mishra, S., Numerical methods with controlled dissipation for small-scale dependent shocks, Acta Numerica, 2014, vol. 23, pp. 743–816.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gel’fand, I.M., Some problems in the theory of quasilinear equations, Usp. Mat. Nauk, 1959, vol. 14, no. 2 (86), pp. 87–158.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrovskii, I.G., On the Cauchy problem for systems of linear partial differential equations in the domain of nonanalytic functions, Byull. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Sekts. A. Mat. Mekh., 1938, vol. 1, no. 7.

  10. Majda, A. and Pego, L., Stable viscosity matrices for systems of conservation laws, J. Differ. Equat., 1985, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 229–262.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Vol’pert, A.I., The spaces BV and quasilinear equations, Math. USSR-Sb., 1967, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 225–267.

  12. LeFloch, P. and Liu, T.-P., Existence Theory for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Systems in Nonconservative Form, Berlin–New York: de Gruyter, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dal, MasoG., LeFloch, P.G., and Murat, F., Definition and weak stability of nonconservative products, J. Math. Pures Appl., 1995, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 483–548.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Colombeau, J.-F., Multiplication of distributions, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 1990, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 251–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Alouges, F. and Merlet, B., Approximate shock curves for non-conservative hyperbolic systems in one space dimension, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equat., 2004, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 769–788.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lax, P., Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves, in CBMS-NSF Reg. Conf. Ser. Appl. Math. Vol. 11 , Philadelphia: SIAM, 1973.

  17. Baer, M.R. and Nunziato, J.W., A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1986, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 861–889.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Toumi, I., A weak formulation of Roe’s approximate Riemann solver, J. Comput. Phys., 1992, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 360–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dumbser, M. and Balsara, D.S., A new efficient formulation of the HLLEM Riemann solver for general conservative and non-conservative hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys., 2016, vol. 304, pp. 275–319.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Parés, C., Numerical methods for nonconservative hyperbolic systems: A theoretical framework, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2006, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 300–321.

  21. Berthon, C., Schéma nonlinéaire pour l’approximation numérique d’un système hyperbolique non conservatif, C. R. Math., 2002, vol. 335, no. 12, pp. 1069–1072.

  22. Kulikovskii, A.G. and Sveshnikova, E.I., Nelineinye volny v uprugikh sredakh (Nonlinear Waves in Elastic Media), Moscow: Mosk. Litsei, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pimentel-Garcia, E., Castro, M.J., Chalons, C., de Luna, T.M., and Parés, C., In-cell discontinuous reconstruction path-conservative methods for non conservative hyperbolic systems—Second-order extension, J. Comput. Phys., 2022, vol. 459, p. 111152.

  24. Chalons, C., Path-conservative in-cell discontinuous reconstruction schemes for non conservative hyperbolic systems, Commun. Math. Sci., 2020, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Polekhina, R.R., Korneev, B.A., and Savenkov, E.B., Numerical study of multiphase hyperbolic models, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2023, vol. 423, p. 114925.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The results in Secs. 4 and 5 were obtained by R.R. Polekhina with the support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as part of the implementation of the program of the Moscow Center for Fundamental and Applied Mathematics under agreement no. 075-15-2022-283. The results of Secs. 1–3 were obtained by M.V. Alekseev and E.B. Savenkov with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-11-00203. https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-11-00203/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to R. R. Polekhina, M. V. Alekseev or E. B. Savenkov.

Additional information

Translated by V. Potapchouck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polekhina, R.R., Alekseev, M.V. & Savenkov, E.B. On the Numerical Solution of Nonconservative Hyperbolic Systems of Equations. Diff Equat 59, 970–984 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266123070108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266123070108

Navigation