Skip to main content
Log in

Construction of Invertible Input-Output Mappings and Parameter Identification

  • Control Theory
  • Published:
Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of continuation of an input-output mapping to a right invertible mapping is solved. The proposed solution is based on transforming the system to a normal form and solving the problem for such systems. The well-known Singh inversion algorithm is modified to calculate the normal forms. It is proved that each step of the modified algorithm can be realized and the result of the algorithm application is a normal form. A new approach to the parameter identification problem based on the inversion of the input-output mapping is proposed to illustrate the application of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fliess, M., A note on invertibility of nonlinear input-output differential systems, Syst. Control Lett., 1986, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 147–151.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Benedetto, M.D., Grizzle, J.W., and Moog, C.H., Rank invariants of nonlinear systems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 1989, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conte, G., Moog, C.H., and Perdon, A.M., Algebraic Methods for Nonlinear Control Systems, London: Springer, 2007.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Il’in, A.V., Korovin, S.K., and Fomichev, V.V., Metody robastnogo obrashcheniya dinamicheskikh sistem (Methods of Robust Inversion of Dynamical Systems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, S.N., A modified algorithm for invertibility in nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1981, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 595–598.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman, L., Inversion of multivariable linear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1969, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 270–276.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirschorn, R.M., Invertibility of multivariable nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1979, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 855–865.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Schenkendorf, R. and Mangold, M., Parameter identification for ordinary and delay differential equations by using flat inputs, Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 2014, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fliess, M., Lévine, J., Martin, Ph., and Rouchon, P., A Lie–Bäcklund approach to equivalence and flatness of nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1999, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 922–937.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wald, S. and Zeitz, M., Flat inputs in the MIMO case, IFAC Proc. Volumes, 2010, vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalitkin, N.N., Chislennye metody (Numerical Methods), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mboup, M., Join, C., and Fliess, M., A revised look at numerical differentiation with an application to nonlinear feedback control, in Proc. of the 15th IEEE Mediterranean Conf. on Control and Automation. Athens, 2007, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mboup, M., Join, C., and Fliess, M., Numerical differentiation with annihilators in noisy environment, Numer. Algorithms, 2009, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 439–467.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Chetverikov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.N. Chetverikov, 2018, published in Differentsial’nye Uravneniya, 2018, Vol. 54, No. 11, pp. 1547–1556.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chetverikov, V.N. Construction of Invertible Input-Output Mappings and Parameter Identification. Diff Equat 54, 1524–1534 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266118110137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012266118110137

Navigation