Advertisement

Cosmic Research

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 108–114 | Cite as

Calculation of the Initial Magnetic Field for Mercury’s Magnetosphere Hybrid Model

  • Igor Alexeev
  • David Parunakian
  • Sergey Dyadechkin
  • Elena Belenkaya
  • Maxim Khodachenko
  • Esa Kallio
  • Markku Alho
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Several types of numerical models are used to analyze the interactions of the solar wind flow with Mercury’s magnetosphere, including kinetic models that determine magnetic and electric fields based on the spatial distribution of charges and currents, magnetohydrodynamic models that describe plasma as a conductive liquid, and hybrid models that describe ions kinetically in collisionless mode and represent electrons as a massless neutralizing liquid. The structure of resulting solutions is determined not only by the chosen set of equations that govern the behavior of plasma, but also by the initial and boundary conditions; i.e., their effects are not limited to the amount of computational work required to achieve a quasi-stationary solution. In this work, we have proposed using the magnetic field computed by the paraboloid model of Mercury’s magnetosphere as the initial condition for subsequent hybrid modeling. The results of the model have been compared to measurements performed by the Messenger spacecraft during a single crossing of the magnetosheath and the magnetosphere. The selected orbit lies in the terminator plane, which allows us to observe two crossings of the bow shock and the magnetopause. In our calculations, we have defined the initial parameters of the global magnetospheric current systems in a way that allows us to minimize paraboloid magnetic field deviation along the trajectory of the Messenger from the experimental data. We have shown that the optimal initial field parameters include setting the penetration of a partial interplanetary magnetic field into the magnetosphere with a penetration coefficient of 0.2.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alekseev, I.I. and Shabansky, V.P., A model of a magnetic field in the geomagnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 1972, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 117–133.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alekseev, I.I., Regular magnetic field in the Earth’s magnetosphere. Geomagn. Aeron., 1978, vol. 18, pp. 656–665.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexeev, I.I., The penetration of interplanetary magnetic and electric fields into the magnetosphere, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 1986, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1199–1221.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alexeev, I.I. and Kalegaev, V.V., Magnetic field and plasma flow structure near the magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 1995, vol. 100, no. A10, pp. 19267–19275.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexeev, I.I. and Bobrovnikov, S.Yu., Dynamics of the magnetotail current sheet during a substorm, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 1997, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 695–700.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexeev, I.I., Belenkaya, E.S., Bobrovnikov, S.Y., and Kalegaev, V.V., Modelling of the electromagnetic field in the interplanetary space and in the Earth’s magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 2003, vol. 107, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–26.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexeev, I.I. and Belenkaya, E.S., Modeling of the Jovian magnetosphere. Ann. Geophys., 2005, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 809–826.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alexeev, I.I., Kalegaev, V.V., Belenkaya, E.S., et al., A global magnetic model of Saturn’s magnetosphere and a comparison with Cassini SOI data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006, vol. 33, no. 8, L08101.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexeev, I.I., Belenkaya, E.S., Slavin, J.A., and Sarantos, M., Paraboloid model of Mercury’s magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2008, vol. 113, A12210.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexeev, I.I., Belenkaya, E.S., Slavin, J.A., et al., Mercury’s magnetospheric magnetic field after the first two MESSENGER flybys, Icarus, 2010, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 23–39.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belenkaya, E.S., Bobrovnikov, S.Y., Alexeev, I.I., et al., A model of Jupiter’s magnetospheric magnetic field with variable magnetopause flaring, Planet. Space Sci., 2005, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 863–872.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benna, M., Anderson, B.J., Baker, D.N., et al., Modeling of the magnetosphere of Mercury at the time of the first MESSENGER flyby, Icarus, 2010, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 3–10.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowley, S.W. and Bunce, E.J., Modulation of Jupiter’s main auroral oval emissions by solar wind induced expansions and compressions of the magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 2003, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 57–79.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gershman, D.J., Slavin, J.A., Raines, J.M., et al., Magnetic flux pileup and plasma depletion in Mercury’s subsolar magnetosheath, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2013, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 7181–7199.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greene, J.M. and Miller, R.L., The field of a screened magnetic dipole, Planet. Space Sci., 1994, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 895–900.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, C.L., Purucker, M.E., Korth, H., et al., MESSENGER observations of Mercury’s magnetic field structure, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 2012, vol. 117, E00L14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joy, S.P., Kivelson, M.G., Walker, R.J., et al., Probabilistic models of the Jovian magnetopause and bow shock locations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2002, vol. 107, no. A10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kallio, E. and Janhunen, P., Modelling the solar wind interaction with Mercury by a quasi-neutral hybrid model, Ann. Geophys., 2003, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2133–2145.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kallio, E. and Janhunen, P., Solar wind and magnetospheric ion impact on Mercury’s surface, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 17.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 6: Fluid Mechanics, Oxford: Pergamon, 1959.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Müller, J., Simon, S., and Wang, Y.-C., et al., Origin of Mercury’s double magnetopause: 3D hybrid simulation study with AIKEF, Icarus, 2012, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 666–687.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Russell, C.T., On the relative locations of the bow shocks of the terrestrial planets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1977, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 387–390.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shue, J.H., Song, P., Russell, C.T., et al., Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 1998, vol. 103, no. A8, pp. 17691–17700.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slavin, J.A. and Holzer, R.E., The effect of erosion on the solar wind stand-off distance at Mercury, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 1979, vol. 84, no. A5, pp. 2076–2082.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Slavin, J.A., Acuña, M.H., Anderson, B.J., et al., MESSENGER observations of magnetic reconnection in Mercury’s magnetosphere, Science, 2009, vol. 324, no. 5927, pp. 606–610.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spreiter, J.R., Summers, A.L., and Alksne, A.Y., Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 1966, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 223–250. IN1–IN2, 251–253.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Winslow, R.M., Anderson, B.J., Johnson, C.L., et al., Mercury’s magnetopause and bow shock from MESSENGER Magnetometer observations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2013, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 2213–2227.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Alexeev
    • 1
  • David Parunakian
    • 1
  • Sergey Dyadechkin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Elena Belenkaya
    • 1
  • Maxim Khodachenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Esa Kallio
    • 3
  • Markku Alho
    • 3
  1. 1.Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear PhysicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Space Research Institute of the Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
  3. 3.Aalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations