Abstract
The aim of the article is to point out the dangers arising from the properties of plastic dust and what influence its properties have on the origin and course of the explosion. The present study deals with a sample of polyethylene dust, by-product of granulate production and storage. The explosion tests are performed on containers of a similar shape to those found in plants. The volumes of the closed vessels are 1.35 m3 (N1) and 5.45 m3 (N2). The tests are conducted in vessel N1 with a venting area DN 250 on the top of the vessel, in vessel N2 with a venting area DN 585 or DN 775 installed on the upper flanges of the vessels, and in vessels interconnected by pipes with a diameter DN 150 and length of 3, 6, and 10 m. The experiments show that the pressure of the explosion in technological equipment may reach higher values than those obtained in laboratory tests. During the explosion propagation in the connected vessels, the effect of overpressure appears due to precompression; as a result, the measured pressure and the rate of pressure rise are many times higher than the values measured only in the vessel itself with a venting area. As the explosion propagates from a larger volume vessel to a smaller volume vessel, the effect of precompression of the mixture increases the explosion parameters in the smaller vessel despite the opening areas of both vessels. Other elements can be also used to ensure sufficient explosion protection. The results also describe the effect of the length of the pipeline route by which the vessels are connected.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
X.-Q. Yan and J.-L. Yu, “Dust Explosion Incidents in China," Process Saf. Prog. 31 (2), 187–189 (2012); DOI: 10.1002/prs.11482.
K. Orlı́ková and P. Štroch, Chemistry of Combustion Processes (SPBI Spektrum, Ostrava, 1999).
W. Bartknecht, Dust Explosions: Course, Prevention, Protection (Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 2011).
“Determination of Explosion Characteristics of Dust Clouds. Part 3: Determination of the Lower Explosion Limit LEL of Dust Clouds," The British Standard EN 14034-3 (38 9684) (2006).
J. Damec, Explosion Prevention (SPBI Spektrum, Ostrava, 2005).
I. Bartlová and J. Damec, Prevention of Technological Equipment (SPBI Spektrum, Ostrava, 2002).
R. K. Eckhoff, Dust Explosions in the Process Industries (Gulf Profes. Publ.–Elsevier Sci., 2003).
M. Portarapillo, R. Sanchirico, and A. Di Benedetto, “On the Pyrotechnic Ignitors Role in Dust Explosion Testing: Comparison between 20L and 1 m3 Explosion Vessels," Process Saf. Prog. 40 (4), 289–295 (2021); DOI: 10.1002/prs.12249.
V. Jankůj and A. Bernatı́k, “Influencing of Maximum Explosive Parameters of Ignition Energies of Dust–Air Mixtures," Trans. VSB—Tech. Univ. Ostrava, Saf. Eng. Ser. 13 (2), 25–32 (2018); DOI: 10.2478/tvsbses-2018-0009.
J. E. Going and T. Lombardo, “Dust Collector Explosion Prevention and Control," Process Saf. Prog. 26 (2), 164–176 (2007); DOI: 10.1002/prs.10166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated from Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 2022, Vol. 58, No. 6, pp. 110-120. https://doi.org/10.15372/FGV20220610.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sklenárová, M., Štroch, P. & Bernatı́k, A. Behavior of Polyethylene Dust in Large-Scale Vessels with Pipes near the Explosion. Combust Explos Shock Waves 58, 728–737 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508222060107
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508222060107