Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the Fireball Size in an Ethyne–Air Cloud Explosion

  • Published:
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves Aims and scope

Abstract

A gas explosion accident is often followed by a serious fire. In order to effectively prevent fire induced by a gas explosion accident, it is necessary to have some knowledge of the related explosion processes. The subject of the present study is to examine deflagration behaviors beyond the original cloud of the ethyne–air mixture and the fireball size in an ethyne–air explosion by means of numerical simulations. The explosion overpressure, flow velocity, and reaction rate distribution in an ethyne–air explosion are obtained. The peak explosion overpressure is found to reach its maximum beyond the original cloud for ethyne–air mixtures with ethyne concentrations greater than 13% (by volume). The explosion pressures beyond the original cloud may be higher than those within the cloud for these ethyne–air mixtures. The ratio of the combustion range to that of the original cloud is 1.4–2.7 in the radial direction on the ground and 1.5–4.0 along the axis of symmetry perpendicular to the ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. R. Baer, R. J. Gross, J. W. Nunziato, and E. A. Igel, “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Deflagrationto- Detonation Transition (DDT) in the Granular Explosive,” Combust. Flame 65 (1), 15–30 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Kessler, V. N. Gamezo, and E. S. Oran, “Simulations of Flame Acceleration and Deflagration-to- Detonation Transitions in Ethyne–Air Systems,” Combust. Flame 157 (1), 2063–2077 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. Frolov, “Acceleration of the Deflagration-to- Detonation Transition in Gases: From Shchelkin to Our Days,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 48 (3), 13–24 (2012) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 48 (3), 258–268 (2012)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Kagan and G. Sivashinsky, “On the Transition from Deflagration to Detonation in Narrow Tubes,” Flow Turbul. Combust. 84 (1), 423–437 (2010).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Middha and O. R. Hansen, “Predicting Deflagration to Detonation Transition in Hydrogen Explosions,” Process Saf. Prog. 27 (3), 192–204 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Q. Zhang, B. Qin, and D. C. Lin, “Estimation of Pressure Distribution for Shock Wave through the Bend of Bend Laneway,” Saf. Sci. 48 (1), 1263–1268 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Q. Zhang, B. Qin, and D. C. Lin, “Estimation of Pressure Distribution for Shock Wave through the Junction of Branch Gallery,” Saf. Sci. 57, 214–222 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Q. Zhang, L. Pang, and H. M. Liang, “Effect of Scale on the Explosion of Methane in Air and Its Shock Wave,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 24 (1), 43–48 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Zhang, L. Pang, and S. X. Zhang, “Effect of Scale on Flame Speeds of Methane–Air,” J. Loss Prevention Process Ind. 24 (5), 705–712 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Q. Zhang and L. Pang, “Flame and Temperature Wave Propagation Characteristic of Methane–Air Mixture in Mine Tunnels,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 23 (5), 885–898 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Akinori and M. Akiko, “Numerical Analysis of Gas Explosion Inside Two Rooms Connected by Ducts,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 20 (4), 455–461 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. D. Jo and D. A. Crowl, “Flame Growth Model for Confined Gas Explosion,” Process Saf. Prog. 28 (2), 141–146 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Marc, G. Andreas, and K. Ulrich, “Experiments on the Influence of Pre-Ignition Turbulence on Vented Gas and Dust Explosions,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 19 (2), 194–199 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. K. Zipf (Jr.) et al., “Ethyne–Air Detonation Experiments at NIOSH Lake Lynn Laboratory,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 (2), 295–301 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Salzano, F. S. Marra, G. Russo, and J. H. S. Lee, “Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Gas Flames in Tubes,” J. Hazard. Mater. 95 (3), 233–247 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Zhdan, “Analysis of the Explosion of Gas Mixtures with a Shift in the Chemical Equilibrium of the Products Taken into Account,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 19 (1), 131–134 (1983) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 19 (1), 124–127 (1983)].

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. A. Zhdan, “Calculation of the explosion of a Gaseous Spherical Charge in Air,” Prikl. Mekh. Tekh. Fiz. 16 (6), 69–74 (1975) [J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 16 (6), 893–896 (1975)].

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. Novozhilov, “Some Aspects of the Mathematical Modelling of Fireballs,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., E: J. Process Mech. Eng. 217 (2), 103–119 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Yang, X. Ding, M. Bi, and A. Abuliti, “Experimental and Simulation Study of the Effect of Fuel Concentration on Flammable Vapor Cloud Explosion,” Acta Petrolei Sinica (in Chinese) 20 (5), 553–558 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Y. Huang, Q. Zhang, H. Yan, W. Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Zhang, Q., Yan, H. et al. Estimation of the Fireball Size in an Ethyne–Air Cloud Explosion. Combust Explos Shock Waves 54, 106–112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001050821801015X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001050821801015X

Keywords

Navigation