Advertisement

Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 329–339 | Cite as

Shock wave induced primary thermal fragmentation of coal particles

  • S. JaisankarEmail author
  • D. M. Patadiya
  • T. S. Sheshadri
Article

Abstract

Coal particles when subjected to shock waves can undergo rapid fragmentation, pyrolysis, and combustion, causing enhanced process intensity and efficiency. Particle fragmentation plays a crucial role in this process. Exposure of coal particles to a shock wave is modelled in the present work as combined convection and radiation at the surface and conduction in the interior. Local temperatures within a coal particle and the corresponding thermal stresses are computed to study particle failure. Particle fracture is modelled by a three-parameter Weibull probability to predict the failure location and time. Simulations indicate that pulverized coal of size up to 250 μm subjected to a shock wave for varying operational, thermal, and physical parameters can experience initial failure within 150 μs. Particles of size d ≥ 50 μm or higher wave strengths (with Mach numbers M ≥ 5) mostly trigger exfoliation, while interior fragmentation dominates at smaller sizes (d ≤ 25 μm). An initial fracture study reveals that pulverized coal with predominant sizes d ≤ 100 μm and the coal rank from lignite to bituminous coal is potentially suitable for detonation combustion in waves at Mach numbers M = 3–6. Coal particles under continuous exposure to post-shock conditions undergo recursive exfoliation until the core is 20–40 μm, after which an interior fragmentation phase is seen until the core is about 1–3 μm. Much finer coal particles, of the order of internal fragmenting cores, are hardly fractured due to low thermal stresses caused by rapid uniform heating. The fracture model approach for studying shock-induced combustion is validated by a reasonable match of the computed ignition delay with experiments. The fragmentation history indicates a substantial increase in the particle surface area and temperature under shock exposure, as against conventional combustion, leading to an increased order of the burning rates at the onset of ignition, which can sustain through the entire burning phase.

Keywords

particle fracture recursive failure Weibull theory fragmenting shrinking core burning shrinking core exfoliation fragmentation combustion detonation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. I. Karpenko, V. E. Messerle, and A. B. Ustimenko, “Plasma-Aided Solid Fuel Combustion,” Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2), 3353–3360 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Dacombe, M. Pourkashanian, A. Williams, and L. Yap, “Combustion-Induced Fragmentation Behavior of Isolated Coal Particles,” Fuel 78 (15), 1847–1857 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Messerle, A. B. Ustimenko, A. S. Askarove, and A. O. Nagibin, “Pulverized Coal Torch Combustion in a Furnace with Plasma–Coal System,” Thermophys. Aeromech. 17 (3), 435–444 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. J. Paprika, M. S. Komatina, D. V. Daki, and S. D. Nemoda, “Prediction of Coal Primary Fragmentation and Char Particle Size Distribution in Fluidized Bed,” Energy Fuels 27 (9), 5488–5494 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Basu, J. H. Greenblatt, and A. Basu, “Studies of the Fragmentation of Different Coals in a Fluidized Bed,” J. Energy Inst. 78 (1), 32–37 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Nettleton and R. Stirling, “The Ignition of Clouds of Particles in Shock-Heated Oxygen,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 300 (1460), 62–77 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Sichel, S. W. Baek, C. W. Kauffman, B. Maker, and J. A. Nicholls, “The Shock Wave Ignition of Dusts,” AIAA J. 23 (9), 1374–1380 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. P. Lee, C. W. Kauffman, M. Sichel, and J. A. Nicholls, “Detonability of RDX Dust in Air/Oxygen Mixtures,” AIAA J. 24 (11), 1811–1816 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. V. Fedorov, T. A. Khmel, and Yu. A. Gosteev, “Theoretical Investigation of Ignition and Detonation of Coal-Particle Gas Mixtures,” Shock Waves 13 (6), 453–463 (2004).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-Sh. Chern and A. N. Hayhurst, “A Model for the Devolatilization of a Coal Particle Sufficiently Large to be Controlled by Heat Transfer,” Combust. Flame 146 (3), 553–571 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Chirone and L. Massimilla, “Primary Fragmentation of Coal in Fluidized Bed Combustion,” Symp. (Int.) on Combustion. 22 (1), 267–277 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Y. No and N. Syred, “Thermal Stress and Pressure Effects on Coal Particle Fragmentation and Burning Behaviour in a Cyclone Combustor,” J. Inst. Energ. 63 (2), 195–202 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Senneca, M. Urciuolo, R. Chirone, and D. Cumbo, “An Experimental Study of Fragmentation of Coals During Fast Pyrolysis at High Temperature and Pressure,” Fuel 90 (9), 2931–2938 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O. Senneca, M. Urciuolo, and R. Chirone, “A Semidetailed Model of Primary Fragmentation of Coal,” Fuel 104, 253–261 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Chirone and L. Massimilla, “The Application of Weibull Theory to Primary Fragmentation of a Coal During Devolatilization,” Powder Technol. 57 (3), 197–212 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. F. Stubington and T. M. Linjewile, “The Effects of Fragmentation on Devolatilization of Large Coal Particles,” Fuel 68 (2), 155–160 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Zhang, K. Cen, J. Yan, and M. Ni, “The Fragmentation of Coal Particles During the Coal Combustion in a Fluidized Bed,” Fuel 81) (14), 1835–1840 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. J. Dacombe, E. Hampartsoumian, and M. Pourkashanian, “Fragmentation of Large Coal Particles in a Drop-Tube Furnace,” Fuel 73 (8), 1365–1367 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. M. Lee, J. S. Kim, and J. J. Kim, “Comminution Characteristics of Korean Anthracite in a CFB Reactor,” Fuel 82 (11), 1349–1357 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. M. Patadiya, S. Jaisankar, and T. S. Sheshadri, “Detonation Initiated Disintegration of Coal Particle due to the Maximum Strain Energy Theory,” J. Coal Sci. Eng. (China) 19 (4), 435–440 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kh. Enkhjargal and V. V. Salomatov, “Mathematical Modeling of the Heat Treatment and Combustion of a Coal Particle. I. Heating Stage,” J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 83 (5), 891–901 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    “Particle Size Reduction of Anthracite Coals During Devolatilization in a Thermobalance Reactor,” Fuel 81 (13), 1633–1639 (2002).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Dakic, M. van der Honing, and G. Valk, “Fragmentation and Swelling of Various Coals During Devolatilization in a Fluidized Bed,” Fuel 68 (7), 911–916 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. Weibull, “A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials,” Ing. Vetenskaps Akad. Hand. 151, 45 (1935).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. S. Manson and R. W. Smith, “Theory of Thermal Shock Resistance of Brittle Materials Based onWeibull’s Statistical Theory of Strength,” J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 38 (1), 18–27 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. B. Crandall and J. Ging, “Thermal Shock Analysis of Spherical Shapes,” J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 38 (1), 44–54 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. P. H. Hasselman, “Unified Theory of Thermal Shock Fracture Initiation and Crack Propagation in Brittle Ceramics,” J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 52 (11), 600–604 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Jaisankar, D. M. Patadiya, and T. S. Sheshadri, “Shock Wave Induced Thermal Fragmentation of Coal Particles,” Tech. Report No. APDL-01-2014 (Indian Inst. of Sci., Bangalore, India, 2014).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Faghri, Y. Zhang, and J. R. Howell, Advanced Heat and Mass Transfer (Global Digital Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. N. Tikhonov, “On Cooling of Bodies in the Course of Emission,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geograf. Geofiz., No. 3, 127–132 (1973).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Honda, Y. Sanada, and T. Furuta, “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Heat Treated Coals,” Carbon 3 (4), 421 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Juniper and G. Schumacher, “13-Advances in Pulverised Fuel Technology: Understanding Coal Comminution, Combustion and Ash Deposition,” in The Coal Handbook: Towards Cleaner Production, Ed. by Dave Osborne (Woodhead Publ., 2013), pp. 312–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. D. Pomeroy and W. T. A. Morgans, “The Tensile Strength of Coal,” Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 7 (7), 243 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    P. Basu, Combustion and Gasification in Fluidized Beds, (CRC Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zh. Wu, “Fundamentals of Pulverised Coal Combustion,” IEA Clean Coal Centre Report (2005).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. E. Mitchell, L. Ma, and B. Kim, “On the Burning Behavior of Pulverized Coal Chars,” Combust. Flame 151 (3), 426–436 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. Oka, Fluidized Bed Combustion (CRC Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    I. W. Smith, “The Intrinsic Reactivity of Carbons to Oxygen,” Fuel 57 (7), 409–414 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    V. E. Banin, F. A. C. M. Commissaris, J. H. J. Moors, and A. Veefkind, “Kinetic Study of Pulverized Coal Combustion at High Pressure using a Shock Tube,” Combust. Flame 108 (1), 1–8 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. V. Fedorov and T. A. Khmel, “Mathematical Simulation of Detonation Processes in a Coal–Particle Suspension,” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 38 (6), 103–112 (2002) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 38 (6), 700–708 (2002)].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. M. Baum and P. J. Street, “Predicting the Combustion Behaviour of Coal Particles,” Combust. Sci. Technol. 3 (5), 231–243 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. H. J. Moors, V. E. Banin, J. H. P. Haas, R. Weber, and A. Veefkind, “Prediction and Validation of Burnout Curves for Göttelborn Char using Reaction Kinetics Determined in Shock Tube Experiments,” Fuel 78 (1), 25–29 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    R. Hurt, J.-K. Sun, and M. Lunden, “A Kinetic Model of Carbon Burnout in Pulverized Coal Combustion,” Combust. Flame 113 (12), 181–197 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    L. D. Timothy, A. F. Sarofim, and J. M. Béer, “Characteristics of Single Particle Coal Combustion,” in Symp. (Int.) on Combustion (Elsevier, 1982), Vol. 19, pp. 1123–1130.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. Bouillard, A. Vignes, O. Dufaud, L. Perrin, and D. Thomas, “Ignition and Explosion Risks of Nanopowders,” J. Hazard. Mater. 181 (13), 873–880 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Jaisankar
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. M. Patadiya
    • 1
  • T. S. Sheshadri
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations