Abstract
A new aluminized explosive is proposed, and the approach is to replace the aluminum powder in the traditional aluminized explosive with an aluminum film. The purpose is not only to improve mechanical properties and lower the impact sensitivity of traditional aluminized explosives, but also to reduce environmental pollution in the aluminum particle production process. The pressure-time curves of the aluminum film explosive and RDX are measured in underwater explosion experiments. The peak pressure, impulse, shock wave energy, and bubble energy are obtained by analyzing the curves. The results of the study indicate that the peak pressure of the aluminum film explosive is lower than that of RDX. However, the aluminum film explosive maintains a high pressure for a longer period of time. The large amount of energy is found to liberate by subsequent reactions of the Al film with the primary detonation products. The increase in the explosion energy of the aluminum film explosive is based mainly on the increase in the bubble energy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. P. Vadhe, R. B. Pawar, R. K. Sinha, S. N. Asthana, and A. Subhananda Rao, “Cast Aluminized Explosives (Review),” Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 44(4), 98–115 (2008) [Combust., Expl., Shock Wave 44 (4), 461–477 (2008)].
Wang Wei, Jian Ling-Wang, Guo Wei, and Xian Zhen-Jia, “Influence of Aluminum Content on the Detonation Pressure and Detonation Velocity of RDX-Based Aluminized Explosive,” Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 33, 15–18 (2010).
M. H. Keshavarz, H. Motamedoshariati, and R. Moghayadnia, “A New Computer Code to Evaluate Detonation Performance of High Explosives and Their Thermochemical Properties, Part I,” J. Hazard. Mater. 172, 1218–1228 (2009).
A. S. Kumar and V. B. Rao, “Evaluation of Plastic Bonded Explosive (PBX) Equationtions Based on RDX, Aluminum, and HTPB for Underwater Applications,” Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 35, 359–364 (2010).
C. G. Rumchik and J. L. Jordan, “Effect of Aluminum Particle Size on the High Strain Rate Properties of Pressed Aluminized Explosives,” in Shock Compression of Condensed Matter (2007), pp. 795–798.
M. J. Stosz, “Development of New Explosives for the US Navy,” in 13th Int. Annu. Conf. of ICT (1982), pp. 257–275.
R. A. Barnes, J. G. Hetherington, and P. D. Smith, “The Design and Instrumentation of a Simple System for Demonstrating Underwater Explosive Effects,” Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 13, 13–16 (1988).
E. Stromoe and S. W. Eriksen, “Performance of High Explosives in Underwater Application. Part 2: Aluminized Explosives,” Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 15, 52–53 (1990).
Physics of Explosion, Ed. by L. P. Orlenko (Nauka, Fizmatlit, 2000) [in Russian].
G. Bjarnholt, “Suggestions on Standards for Measurement and Data Evaluation in the Underwater Explosion Test,” Propellants Explos. 5, 67–74 (1980).
Sun Ye-Bin, Hui Jun-Ming, and Cao Xin-Mao, Mixture Explosives for Military Purposes (Ordnance Industry Press, Beijing, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 130–136, July–August, 2014.
Original Russian Text © M.-J. Lin, H.-H. Ma, Z.-W. Shen, L. Li.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, M.J., Ma, H.H., Shen, Z.W. et al. Underwater detonation performance of the aluminum film explosive. Combust Explos Shock Waves 50, 488–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508214040194
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508214040194