, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 30–39 | Cite as

Kinetic model of functioning and regulation of Escherichia coli isocitrate dehydrogenase

  • E. A. Mogilevskaya
  • G. V. Lebedeva
  • I. I. Goryanin
  • O. V. Demin
Molecular Biophysics


To describe published experimental data on the functioning of E. coli isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), a Rapid Equilibrium Random Bi Ter mechanism involving the formation of two dead-end enzyme complexes is proposed and a kinetic model of enzyme functioning is constructed. The enzyme is shown to be regulated through reversible phosphorylation by IDH kinase/phosphatase; the latter, in its turn, is controlled by IDH substrates and also by a number of central metabolites—pyruvate, 3-phosphoglycerate, and AMP—reflecting the energy demand of the cell. Using the model, it is shown that an increase in the concentration of the above effectors raises the fraction of active IDH and thus enhances the Krebs cycle flux. The ratio between the free and the phosphorylated forms of IDH is more sensitive to AMP, NADP, and isocitrate than to pyruvate and 3-phosphoglycerate. The model also predicts changes in the ratio between phosphorylated and active forms of IDH in the Krebs cycle that occur with a change in the energy and biosynthetic loads on E. coli cells.

Key words

Krebs cycle isocitrate dehydrogenase kinetic model 



isocitrate dehydrogenase








Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. C. Neidhardt, Cell. Mol. Biol. 1, 3 (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. L. Kornberg and H. A. Krebs, Nature 179, 988 (1957).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. G. Nimmo, Biochem. J. 234, 317 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. M. Dean and D. E. Koshland, Biochemistry 32, 9302 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. W. Cleland, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 67, 104 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. L. Stoddard, A. Dean, and D. E. Koshland, Biochemistry 32, 9310 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. P. Miller, R. Chen, E. J. Karschnia, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 275(2), 833 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Cornish-Bowden, Principles of Enzyme Kinetics (Butterworths, London, 1976; Mir, Moscow, 1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. V. Demin, I. I. Goryanin, S. Dronov, and G. V. Lebedeva, Biokhimiya 69, 1625 (2004).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Goryanin, T. C. Hodgman, and E. Selkov, Bioinformatics 15, 749 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. L. Uhr, V. W. Thompson, and W. W. Cleland, J. Biol. Chem. 249, 2920 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. S. Stueland, K. R. Eck, Stieglbauer, and D. C. LaPorte, J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16095 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. S. Stueland, K. Gorden, and D. C. LaPorte, J. Biol. Chem. 263, 19475 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Walsh, and D. E. Koshland, Jr., J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9646 (1984).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. H. Lowry, J. Carter, J. B. Ward, and L. Glaser, J. Biol. Chem. 246, 6511 (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. B. Andersen, and K. von Meyenburg, J. Biol. Chem. 252, 4151 (1977).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. C. LaPorte and D. E. Koshland, Jr., Nature 305, 286 (1983).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Mogilevskaya
    • 1
  • G. V. Lebedeva
    • 1
  • I. I. Goryanin
    • 2
  • O. V. Demin
    • 1
  1. 1.Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical BiologyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations