Abstract
The context-dependent conformation preference and the conformational lability of DNA play important roles in the formation of complexes with various proteins including transcription factors, regulatory and nucleosomal proteins. The extraction of context-dependent DNA helix parameters and the related deformation characteristics from static crystalline DNA duplex structures involves artifacts caused by the crystal packing effects. A series of 150 tetradeca-and pentadecameric DNA duplexes with various sequences occurring in aqueous solution under physiological conditions have been simulated by the method of molecular dynamics (MD). The context-dependent conformation parameters of XY dinucleotides were determined from analysis of the MD trajectories of equilibrium thermal fluctuations of 3D structures for a large set of 14-membered DNA duplexes in aqueous solution. The mean values of the helix parameters roll and twist as well as their thermal fluctuations for the TA, TG, and CG pair steps proved to take special values significantly differing from the averages over all pairs. This fact suggests that DNA sites rich in TA, TG, and CG are capable of forming special local equilibrium structures and have increased conformational plasticity, thus favoring conformational matching at the sites of regulatory and nucleosomal protein binding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. G. Levitsky, M. P. Ponomarenko, J. V. Ponomarenko, et al., Bioinformatics 15(7–8), 582 (1999).
A. Bolshoy, K. Shapiro, E. N. Trifonov, and I. Ioshikhes, Nucl. Acid Res. 25(16), 3248 (1997).
H. M. Berman, Biopolymers, 44(1), 23 (1997).
W. K. Olson, A. A. Gorin, X.-J. Lu, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11163 (1998).
D. S. Goodsell, M. Kaczor-Grzeskowiak, and R. E. Dickinson, J. Mol. Biol. 239, 79 (1994).
H. Rosenberg, D. Rabinovich, F. Frolow, R. S. Hegde, Z. Shakked. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15194 (1998).
K. J. McConnell and D. L. Beveridge, J. Mol. Biol. 304, 803 (2000).
Y. N. Vorobjev, Molek. Biol. 37(2), 240 (2003) [Mol. Biol. (English translation) 37, 210 (2003)].
W. K. Olson, X.-J. Lu, J. Westbrook, et al., 313, 229 (2001).
T. Schlick, Molecular Modeling and Simulation (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), p. 138.
W. K. Olson and V. B. Zhurkin, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 286 (2000).
J. Norberg and L. Nilsson, Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 465 (2002).
URL: 2001. AMBER 6, Home page: http://www.amber.ucsf.edu/amber/index/html
T. Schlick, Molecular Modeling and Simulation (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000), p. 151.
L. D. Beveridge and K. J. McConnell, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 182 (2000).
D. Bhattacharyya. S. Kundu, A. R. Thakur, and R. Majumdar, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 17(2), 289 (1999).
J. F. Marko and E. D. Siggia, Science 256, 506 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vorobjev, Y.N., Emel’yanov, D.Y. Modeling context-dependent conformation parameters of DNA duplexes. BIOPHYSICS 51 (Suppl 1), 28–34 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906070062
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906070062