Skip to main content
Log in

InterPro as a new tool for complete genome analysis: An example of comparative analysis

  • Molecular Biophysics
  • Published:
Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

InterPro, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, protein domains, and functional sites, was developed to amalgamate the individual efforts of the PROSITE, PRINTS, Pfam, and ProDom databases. InterPro can be used for the computational functional classification of newly determined amino acid sequences that lack biochemical characterization and for comparative genome analysis. InterPro contains over 3500 entries for more than 1 000 000 hits in SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL. The database is accessible for text-and sequence-based searches at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/. InterPro was used for the complete analysis of the proteome of the pathogenic microorganism Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the comparison with the predicted protein-coding sequences of the complete genomes of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. It was found that 64.8% of proteins in the proteome of M. tuberculosis matched InterPro entries and can be classified by their functions. The comparison with B. subtilis and E. coli provided information on the most common protein families and domains and on the most highly represented protein families in each organism. Thus, InterPro is a useful tool for general comparison of complete proteomes and their compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Apweiler, T. K. Attwood, A. Bairoch, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 291, 37 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. K. Attwood, M. D. R. Croning, D. R. Flower, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 225 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Hofmann, P. Bucher, L. Falquet, and A. Bairoch, Nucl. Acids Res. 27, 215 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bateman, E. Birney, R. Durbin, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 263 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Corpet, F. Servant, J. Gouzy, and D. Kahn, Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 267 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. T. Cole, R. Brosch, J. Parkhill, et al., Nature 11(393), 537 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bairoch and R. Apweiler, Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 45 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Apweiler, M. Biswas, W. Fleischmann, et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 29, 44 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.J. Mulder, W. Fleischmann, A. Kanapin, R. Apweiler, 2006, published in Biofizika, 2006, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 656–660.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, N.J., Fleischmann, W., Kanapin, A. et al. InterPro as a new tool for complete genome analysis: An example of comparative analysis. BIOPHYSICS 51, 587–591 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040117

Key words

Navigation