Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary differences between alternative and constitutive protein-coding regions of alternatively spliced genes of Drosophila

  • Molecular Biophysics
  • Published:
Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 790 Drosophila melanogaster genes that are alternatively spliced in a coding region and have orthologs in Drosophila pseudoobscura were studied. It proved that nucleotide substitutions are accumulated in alternative coding regions more rapidly than in constitutive coding regions. Moreover, the evolutionary patterns of alternative regions differing in insertion-deletion mechanisms (use of alternative promoters, splicing sites, or polyadenylation sites) differ significantly. The synonymous substitution rate in coding regions of genes varies more strongly than the nonsynonymous substitution rate. The patterns of substitutions in different classes of alternative regions of Drosophila melanogaster and mammals differ considerably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. B. Malko, in Proceedings of the Second International Moscow Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, 2005, p. 224.

  2. F. Clark and T. A. Thanaraj, Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 451 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Burset, I. A. Seledtsov, and V. V. Solovyev, Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 4364 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Sorek and G. Ast, Genome Res. 13, 1631 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Iida and H. Akashi, Gene 261, 93 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. O. Ermakova, in Proceedings of the Second International Moscow Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, 2005, p. 95.

  7. M. Singer and P. Berg, Genes and Genomes: A Changing Perspective (University Science Books, Mill Valley, Calif., 1991; Mir, Moscow, 1998), Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Mironov, P. S. Novichkov, and M. S. Gelfand, Bioinformatics 17, 13 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Ina, J. Mol. Evol. 40, 190 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kimura, J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Duret and D. Mouchiroud, Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 68 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Pal, B. Papp, and L. D. Hurst, Genetics 158, 927 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Xing and C. Lee, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13526 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.O. Ermakova, D.B. Mal’ko, M.S. Gelfand, 2006, published in Biofizika, 2006, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 581–588.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ermakova, E.O., Mal’ko, D.B. & Gelfand, M.S. Evolutionary differences between alternative and constitutive protein-coding regions of alternatively spliced genes of Drosophila . BIOPHYSICS 51, 515–522 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350906040014

Key words

Navigation