Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Critical States of Technological Processes Based on Predictive Analytics Methods

  • CONTROL IN TECHNICAL SYSTEMS
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper proposes a predictive approach to assessing special classes of dangerous states in the development of technological processes in order to make proactive decisions. The developed approach is based on a hybrid model based on the combination of an evidence-based classifier, fuzzy logic, and a Dempster–Shafer probabilistic scheme for evidence combination. The article presents a formal description of the predictor of critical states of the technological process. The resulting approach is universal and applicable in the automation of any complex technical systems. As an example, this article considers the application of the developed approach to solve the problem for assessing the safety of the technological process of shunting trains on a hump yard. The presented example shows the high efficiency and practical usefulness of the developed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

REFERENCES

  1. Bukreev, V.G., Kolesnikova, S.I., and Yankovskaya, A.E., Vyyavlenie zakonomernostei vo vremennykh ryadakh v zadachakh raspoznavaniya sostoyanii dinamicheskikh ob”ektov (Identification of Patterns in Time Series in Problems of Recognition of the States of Dynamic Objects), Tomsk: Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2010.

  2. Tsvetkov, V.Ya., Complex Technical Systems, Obrazovatel’nye resursy i tekhnologii, 2017, no. 3(20), pp. 86–92.

  3. Vychuzhanin, V.V. and Vychuzhanin, A.V., Information Cognitive Simulation Model of Complex Technical System, Informatsionnye Sistemy i Tekhnologii IST-2020, 2020, pp. 677–683.

  4. Buravtsev, A.V. and Tsvetkov, V.Ya., Complicated Organizational and Calculating Systems, Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovaniya, 2018, no. 4(34), pp. 293–300.

  5. Shabelnikov, A.N. and Olgeyzer, I.A., Methods for Improving Safety in KSAU SP, Avtomatika, Svyaz’, Informatika, 2017, no. 3, pp. 8–10.

  6. Gurov, Y.V., Khatlamadzhiyan, A.E., Khilkov, D.V., and Shapovalova, Y., Adaptive Fuzzy Systems for Predictive Diagnostics of Railway Facilities, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2022, vol. 330 LNNS, pp. 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_17

  7. Sukhanov, A.V., Kovalev, S.M., Akperov, I.G., and Olgeyzer, I.A., Detection of Precursors of Bifurcations of a Dynamic System Based on the Analysis of the Structure of Its Fuzzy Model, Integrirovannye modeli i myagkie vychisleniya v iskusstvennom intellekte IMMV-2020: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov XI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Integrated Models and Soft Computing in Artificial Intelligence IMMV-2022: Collection scientific works of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference), in 2 vol., Kolomna, May 16–19, 2022, Vol. 1, Kolomna: Russian Association of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, pp. 137–144.

  8. Gorrini, V., Salome, T., and Bersini, H., Self-Structuring Fuzzy Systems for Function Approximation, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, IEEE, 1995, vol. . 2, pp. 919–926.

  9. Quost, B., Masson, M.-H., and Denoeux, T., Classifier Fusion in the Dempster-Shafer Framework Using Optimized t-Norm Based Combination Rules, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2011, no. 52(3), pp. 353–374.

  10. Denoeux, T., Logistic Regression Revisited: Belief Function Analysis, International Conference on Belief Functions, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 57–64.

  11. Dempster, A.P., Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, no. 38, pp. 325–339.

  12. Yager, R.R., Measures of Entropy and Fuzziness Related to Aggregation Operators, Information Sciences, 1995, vol. 82, nos. 3–4, pp. 147–166.

  13. Afanasieva, T.V., Granulation of Multivariate Time Series in The Problem of Descriptive Analysis of the State and Behavior of Complex Objects, Automation and Remote Control, 2022, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 884–893.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Trofimov, V.B., An Approach to Intelligent Control of Complex Industrial Processes: An Example of Ferrous Metal Industry, Automation and Remote Control, 2020, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1856–1864.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazantseva, L.S. and Yugrina, O.P., Normalization of Shipment Delivery Dates and Technology of Transportation Process, Byulleten’ transportnoi informatsii, 2015, no. 6, pp. 29–33. ISSN 2072-8115

  16. Pokrovskaya, O.D., Logistics Transport Systems of Russia in the Context of New Sanctions, Byulleten’ Rezul’tatov Nauchnykh Issledovanii, 2022, no. 1, pp. 80–94.

  17. Mukha, Yu.A., Tishkov, L.B., Sheykin, V.P., et al., Posobie po primeneniyu pravil i norm proektirovaniya sortirovochnykh ustroistv (Manual on the Application of Rules and Norms for Design of AssortingWorks), Moscow: Transport, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821602012

  18. Pravila i normy proektirovaniya sortirovochnykh ustroistv na zheleznykh dorogakh kolei 1520 mm (Rules and Design Standards for Assorting Works on Railways with Track 1520 mm), Moscow: Tehinform, 2003.

  19. Bessonenko, S.A., Doctoral Thesis, Moscow: Moscow State University of Railway Engineering, 2011.

  20. Olgeyzer, I.A., Sukhanov, A.V., Shabelnikov, A.N., and Ignatieva, O.V., Fuzzy Approach to Car Retarding Adaptation on Hump Yards, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2022, vol. 330 LNNS, pp. 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87178-9_16

  21. Rules for the technical operation of the railways of the Russian Federation, approved by Order of the Ministry of Transport of Russia dated July 23, 2022, no. 250.

  22. Utility model patent no. 95623 U1 Russian Federation, IPC B61L 17/00. Integrated automation system for sorting process control (KSAU SP): no. 2010109685/22: Appl. March 15, 2010: publ. 07, Danshin, A.I., Zolotarev, Yu.F., Odikadze, V.R., et al., applicant JSC “Scientific Research and Design Institute of Informatization, Automation, and Communication in Railway Transport.”

  23. Andronov, D.V., Experience in Operating the KSAU SP System, Avtomatika, Svyaz’, Informatika, 2013, no. 11, pp. 16–18.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. M. Kovalev, A. V. Sukhanov, I. A. Olgeyzer or K. I. Kornienko.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication by M.F. Karavai, a member of the Editorial Board

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kovalev, S.M., Sukhanov, A.V., Olgeyzer, I.A. et al. Identification of Critical States of Technological Processes Based on Predictive Analytics Methods. Autom Remote Control 84, 424–433 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117923040100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117923040100

Keywords:

Navigation