Skip to main content
Log in

Neural Network for Data Preprocessing in Computed Tomography

  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a lightweight noise-canceling filtering neural network that implements the filtering stage in the algorithm for tomographic reconstruction of convolution and backprojection (Filtered BackProjection—FBP). We substantiate the neural network architecture, selected on the basis of the possibility of approximating the ramp filtering operation with sufficient accuracy. The network performance has been demonstrated using synthetic data that mimics low-exposure tomographic projections. The quantum nature of X-ray radiation, the exposure time of one frame, and the nonlinear response of the ionizing radiation detector are taken into account when generating the synthetic data. The reconstruction time using the proposed network is 11 times shorter than that of the heavy networks selected for comparison, with the reconstruction quality in the \(SSIM\) metric above 0.9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Hu, Z. et al., An improved statistical iterative algorithm for sparse-view and limited-angle CT image reconstruction, Sci. Rep., 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Swensen, S.J. et al., Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 2002, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 508–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Thanh, D. et al., A review on CT and X-ray images denoising methods, Informatica, 2019, vol. 43, no. 2.

  4. Johnson, C.A. and Sofer, A., A Data-parallel Algorithm for Iterative Tomographic Image Reconstruction, Proc. Frontiers’99. Seventh Symp. Frontiers of Massively Parallel Computation, IEEE, 1999, pp. 126–137.

  5. Yang, H.K. et al., Slice-wise reconstruction for low–dose cone–beam CT using a deep residual convolutional neural network, Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2019, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler, J. and Oktem, O., learned primal–dual reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2018, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1322–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizusawa, S. et al., Computed tomography image reconstruction using stacked U-Net, Comput. Med. Imaging Graphics, 2021, vol. 90, p. 101920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han, Y. and Ye, J.C., Framing U-Net via deep convolutional framelets: application to sparse–view CT, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2018, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1418–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakai, H. et al., Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of convolutional neural networks with a deeper U-net for sparse-view computed tomography reconstruction, Acad. Radiol., 2020, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu, L. et al., Metal artifact reduction for X-ray computed tomography using U-net in image domain, IEEE Access, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 98743–98754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cierniak, R., A 2D Approach to Tomographic Image Reconstruction Using a Hopfield–type Neural Network, Artif. Intell. Med., 2008, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 113–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, Q. et al., Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance and perceptual loss, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2018, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1348–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bulatov, K. et al., Monitored reconstruction: computed tomography as an anytime algorithm, IEEE Access, 2020, vol. 8, pp. 110759–110774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hore, A. and Ziou, D., Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM, 2010 20th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit., IEEE, 2010, pp. 2366–2369.

  15. Kofler, A., et al., A U-nets cascade for sparse view computed tomography, in Int. Workshop on Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction, Cham: Springer, 2018. P. 91–99.

  16. Wei, Y., Wang, G., and Hsieh, J., An intuitive discussion on the ideal ramp filter in computed tomography (I), Comput. Math. Appl., 2005, vol. 49, no. 5–6, pp. 731–740.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kak, A.C., Slaney, M., and Wang, G., Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, 2002.

  18. Adler, J., Kohr, H., and Öktem, O., ODL—a Python Framework for Rapid Prototyping in Inverse Problems, 2017. Code and documentation available online at https://github.com/odlgroup/odl .

  19. Van Aarle, W. et al., The ASTRA toolbox: a platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography, Ultramicroscopy, 2015, vol. 157, pp. 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partly financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, projects nos. 19-01-00790 and 18-29-26017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. V. Yamaev, M. V. Chukalina, D. P. Nikolaev, A. V. Sheshkus or A. I. Chulichkov.

Additional information

Translated by V. Potapchouck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaev, A.V., Chukalina, M.V., Nikolaev, D.P. et al. Neural Network for Data Preprocessing in Computed Tomography. Autom Remote Control 82, 1752–1762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792110012X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792110012X

Keywords

Navigation