Skip to main content
Log in

Estimate of a Smooth Approximation to the Production Function for Integrating Hamiltonian Systems

  • MATHEMATICAL GAME THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many applied control problems in economics, ecology, demography, and other areas, the relationship between dependent and independent main variables is determined statistically, which does not guarantee the smoothness of the model functional dependence. Particularly, in economic growth models, the production function describing the dependence of the output on the production factors is commonly supposed to be everywhere smooth; however, because of this constraint, qualitative parameters affecting the output cannot be included in the model. We propose an approach overcoming the requirement for the production function to be everywhere differentiable. The method is based on a smooth approximation to the production function, which is constructed simultaneously with the integration of the Hamiltonian system. A differentiable approximation to the production function is derived by constructing an asymptotic state observer for an auxiliary system. It should be noted that the standard approach to the approximation of nonsmooth components of the model on a finite time interval may not work here, which necessitates stabilizing the Hamiltonian system on an infinite time interval. The theoretical results are supported by numerical experiments for the one-sector economic growth model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aivazyan, S.A., Metody ekonometriki (Methods of Econometrics), Moscow: Magistr: INFRA-M, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aseev, S.M., A method of smooth approximation in the theory of necessary optimality conditions for differential inclusions, Izv. Math., 1997, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 235–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aseev, S.M. and Kryazhimskii, A.V., The Pontryagin maximum principle and problems of optimal economic growth, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 2007, vol. 257, pp. 1–255.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Egorov, A.I., Osnovy teorii upravleniya (Foundations of Control Theory), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krasovskii, A.A. and Taras’ev, A.M., Dynamic optimization of investments in the economic growth models, Autom. Remote Control, 2007, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1765–1777.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Krasovskii, A.A. and Taras’ev, A.M., Properties of Hamiltonian systems in the Pontryagin’s maximum principle for economic growth problems, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 2008, vol. 262, pp. 121–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurzhanskii, A.B., Upravlenie i nablyudenie v usloviyakh neopredelennosti (Control and Observation under Uncertainty), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pontryagin, L.S., Boltyanskii, V.G., Gamkrelidze, R.V., and Mishchenko, E.F., Matematicheskaya teoriya optimal’nykh protsessov (Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarasyev, A.M. and Usova, A.A., Construction of a regulator for the Hamiltonian system in a two-sector economic growth model, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 2010, vol. 271, pp. 265–285.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tarasyev, A.M. and Usova, A.A., Stabilizing the Hamiltonian system for constructing optimal trajectories, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 2012, vol. 277, pp. 248–265.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Timan, A.F., Teoriya priblizheniya funktsii deistvitel’nogo peremennogo (Theory of Approximation of Functions of a Real Variable), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ane, B.K., Tarasyev, A.M., and Watanabe, C., Construction of nonlinear stabilizer for trajectories of economic growth, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 2007, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 303–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Arrow, K.J., Production and Capital. Collected Papers. Vol. 5 , Cambridge, MA–London: Belknap Harvard Univ., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ayres, R., Krasovskii, A.A., and Tarasyev, A.M., Nonlinear stabilizers of economic growth under exhausting energy resources, Proc. IFAC CAO’09 (2009), pp. 251–256.

  15. Crespo Cuaresma, J., Palokangas, T., and Tarasyev, A., Dynamic Systems, Economic Growth, and the Environment, Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Crespo, CuaresmaJ., Palokangas, T., and Tarasyev, A., Green Growth and Sustainable Development, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Efimov, D., Polyakov, A., Levant, A., and Perruquetti, W., Convergence acceleration for observers by gain commutation, Int. J. Control, 2017, pp. 1–20.

  18. Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E., Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA–London: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Intriligator, M.D., Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory, Classics Appl. Math., Philadelphia: SIAM, 2002.

  20. Kautsky, J., Nichols, N.K., and Van Dooren, P., Robust pole assignment in linear state feedback, Int. J. Control, 1985, vol. 41, pp. 1129–1155.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Khalil, H.K., Nonlinear Systems (3rd Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krasovskii, A.A., Kryazhimskiy, A.V., and Tarasyev, A.M., Optimal control design in models of economic growth, Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control (Barcelona: CIMNE, 2008), pp. 70–75.

  23. Krasovskii, A. and Tarasyev, A., Conjugation of Hamiltonian systems in optimal control problems, Proc. 17th IFAC World Congr., 2008, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7784–7789.

  24. Shell, K., Applications of Pontryagin maximum principle to economics, Math. Syst. Theory Econ., 1969, no. 1, pp. 241–292.

  25. Solow, R.M., Growth Theory: An Exposition, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tarasyev, A.M. and Usova, A.A., An iterative direct-backward procedure for construction of optimal trajectories in control problems with infinite horizon, Proc. 18th IFAC World Congr., 2011, vol. 18.

  27. Tarasyev, A.M. and Usova, A.A., Structure of the Jacobian in economic growth models, Proc. the 16th IFAC Workshop CAO, 2015, vol. 48, no. 25, pp. 191–196.

  28. Tarasyev, A.M. and Watanabe, C., Optimal dynamics of innovation in models of economic growth, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 2001, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 175–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 19-11-00105.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. M. Tarasyev or A. A. Usova.

Additional information

Translated by V. Potapchouck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarasyev, A.M., Usova, A.A. Estimate of a Smooth Approximation to the Production Function for Integrating Hamiltonian Systems. Autom Remote Control 82, 911–925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117921050143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117921050143

Keywords

Navigation