Skip to main content
Log in

On the Program Character of Trajectory Control over Observations of a Moving Target

  • Topical Issue
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a Gaussian linear-quadratic control problem with incomplete data for a stochastic object (target) from a moving observer with nonlinear dynamics in continuous time. Characteristic features of this formulation include the fact that the stochastic dynamics equation of the observation object and the actual observation equations depend on the vector of the current state of the observer. The observer’s control objective is to choose a rational trajectory of its movement in the sense of minimizing the expectation of a certain payoff functional (cost). In problems of this kind, optimal control over observations (in the considered case, control over the trajectory of the observer) is usually sought in the class of program controls, i.e., as a function of time and initial conditions. A natural question arises: what will change if we extend the class of program controls by the observer to the class of positional ones, i.e., to the class of controls that depend not only on time and initial conditions but also on the realizations of observations and the trajectory of the observer at a given time moment. We consider two meaningful special cases of the general formulation of the problem where such an extension does not improve the control quality. We give examples and proof of the theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athans, M. and Shweppe, F., Optimal Waveform Design via Control Theoretical concepts, Inform. Control, 1967, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yashin, A.I., Filtration of Non-Stationary Processes with Taking into Account Observation Cost, Autom. Remote Control, 1969, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yashin, A.I., On Choosing the Optimal Observation Process, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Tekhn. Kibern., 1969, no. 2, pp. 121–123.

  4. Chernous’ko, F.L., On Optimization of the Observation Process, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1969, vol. 33, pp. 101–111.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Solyanik, A.I. and Chernous’ko, F.L., Optimization of the Observation Process under Random Perturbations, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1969, vol. 33, pp. 720–729.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kats, I.Ya. and Kurzhansky, A.B., Concerning Certain Problems of Observation and Control under Random Circumstances, Autom. Remote Control, 1970, pp. 1913–1923.

  7. Miller, B.M., Optimal Control of Observations in Filtering Diffusional Processes. I, II, Autom. Remote Control, 1985, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 207–214; no. 6, pp. 745–754.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, B.M., Generalized Optimization in Problems of Obsevation Control, Autom. Remote Control, 1991, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rubinovich, E.Ya., Trajectory-Wise Control of Observations in Digital Stochastic Problems, Autom. Remote Control, 1980, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 365–372.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Martineza, S. and Bullob, F., Optimal Sensor Placement and Motion Coordination for Target Tracking, Automatica, 2006, vol. 42, pp. 661–668.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Grigor’ev, F.N., Kuznetsov, N.A., and Serebrovskii, A.P., Upravlenie nablyudeniyami v avtomaticheskikh sistemakh (Control over Observations in Automatic Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malyshev, V.V., Krasil’shchikov, M.N., and Karlov, V.I., Optimizatsiya nablyudeniya i upravleniya letatel’nymi apparatami (Optimization of Observation and Control for Flying Vehicles), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liptser, R.Sh. and Shiryaev, A.N., Statistika sluchainykh protsessov (Statistics of Random Processes), Moscow: Nauka, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Butov, A.A., Kuznetsov, N.A., et al., Generalized Observation Control in Problems of Stochastical Optimization, Proc. 8th IFAC World Congress, Kyoto, Japan. 1981.

  15. Andreev, K.V. and Rubinovich, E.Ya., Moving Observer Trajectory Control by Angular Measurements in Tracking Problem, Autom. Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 106–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Andreev, K.V. and Rubinovich, E.Ya., UAV Control with the Landscape Map under Angular Measurements of a Moving Target, Izv. Yuzhn. Federal. Univ., Tekh. Nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 185–195.

  17. Nardone, S.C. and Aidala, V.J., Observability Criteria for Bearings-Only Target Motion Analysis, IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst., 1981, vol. AES-17, no. 2, pp. 162–166.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

R.Sh. Liptser has recommended the author to publish these results in continuous time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Ya. Rubinovich.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication by B.M. Miller, a member of the Editorial Board

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2020, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2020, No. 3, pp. 157–173.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubinovich, E.Y. On the Program Character of Trajectory Control over Observations of a Moving Target. Autom Remote Control 81, 503–516 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792003008X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792003008X

Keywords

Navigation