Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness and Control Decentralization: Stochastic Case

  • Stochastic Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of decision-making under risk is considered. It is assumed that the operating party (also called the Principal) can process only a limited amount of information about an uncertain factor and reckons upon the expected value of his payoff. Two control modes are compared. In the first mode, decision-making is centralized. In the second, the operating party delegates some of his decision authority to several agents. It is assumed that the operating party knows the interests of agents and relies on their rational behavior; in all other respects, the operating party is cautious about the uncertainty of their choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mesarovic, M.D., Macko, D., and Takahara, Y., Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems, Ser. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 68, Elsevier, 1970.

  2. Novikov, D., Institutsional’noe upravlenie organizatsionnymi sistemami (Institutional Control of Organizational Systems), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voronin, A.A. and Mishin, S.P., Optimal’nye ierarkhicheskie struktury (Optimal Hierarchical Structures), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alonso, R., Dessein, W., and Matouschek, N., When Does Coordination Require Centralization?, Am. Econom. Rev., 2008, vol. 98, pp. 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melamud, N., Mookherjee, D., and Reichelstein, S., Hierarchical Decentralization of Incentive Contracts, Rand J. Econom., 1995, vol. 26, pp. 654–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Germeier, Yu.B. and Moiseev, N.N., On Some Problems in the Theory of Hierarchical Systems, in Problemy prikladnoi matematiki i mekhaniki (Problems of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics), Moscow: Nauka, 1971, pp. 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moiseev, N.N., Matematicheskie zadachi sistemnogo analiza (Mathematical Problems of Systems Analysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moiseev, N.N., Hierarchical Structures and Game Theory, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekh. Kibern., 1973, no. 6, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gorelov, V.A. and Ereshko, F.I., Awareness and Control Decentralization, Autom. Remote Control, 2019, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1063–1076.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Engelking, R., General Topology, Polish Scientific Publishers, 1977.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolmogorov, A.N. and Fomin, S.V., Elementy teorii funktsii i funktsional’nogo analiza (Elements of Function Theory and Functional Analysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. A. Gorelov or F. I. Ereshko.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication by F.T. Aleskerov, a member of the Editorial Board

Russian Text © The Author(s), 2020, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2020, No. 1, pp. 52–66.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorelov, M.A., Ereshko, F.I. Awareness and Control Decentralization: Stochastic Case. Autom Remote Control 81, 41–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792001004X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511792001004X

Keywords

Navigation