Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 78, Issue 6, pp 974–988 | Cite as

Anisotropy-based analysis for finite horizon time-varying systems with non-centered disturbances

Linear Systems

Abstract

We consider the problem of anisotropy-based analysis of the robust quality linear discrete time-varying systems with finite horizon under random external disturbance. Uncertainty in the probability distributions of disturbance vectors is found with the information-theoretic notion of anisotropy and additional conditions on the first two moments. The quality of operation of the object is defined by the value of the anisotropic norm of the input-output matrix corresponding to the system. We show that computing the anisotropic norm of a time-varying system in the state space with non-centered disturbance is related to solving a system of difference matrix equations and equations of a special form. We show a sample computation of the anisotropic norm for a time-varying system with finite horizon.

Keywords

anisotropy-based control theory non-centered random signals linear discrete time-varying system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Doyle, J., Glover, K., Khargonekar, P., and Francis, B., State-Space Solutions to Standard H2- and H-Control Problems, IEEE Trans. AC, 1989, vol. 34, pp. 831–848.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gu, D.-W., Tsai, M.C., O’Young, S.D., and Postletwaite, I., State-Space Formulae for Discrete-Time H Optimization, Int. J. Control, 1989, vol. 49, pp. 1683–1723.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein, D.S. and Haddad, W.M., LQG Control with an H Performance Bound: A Riccati Equation Approach, IEEE Trans. AC, 1989, vol. 34, pp. 293–305.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haddad, W.M., Bernstein, D.S., and Mustafa, D, Mixed H2/H Regulation and Estimation: The Discrete Time Case, Syst. Control Lett., 1991, vol. 16, pp. 235–247.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khargonekar, P.P. and Rotea, M.A, Mixed H2/H Control: A Convex Optimization Approach, IEEE Trans. AC, 1991, vol. 36, pp. 824–837.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rotea, M.A. and Khargonekar, P.P., H2-Optimal Control with an H-Constraint: The State Feedback Case, Automatica, 1991, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 307–316.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, K., Glover, K., Bodenheimer, B.A., and Doyle, J.C, Mixed H2 and H Performance Objectives. I. Robust Performance Analysis, II. Optimal Control, IEEE Trans. AC, 1991, vol. 39, pp. 1564–1574; pp. 1575–1587.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Semyonov, A.V., Vladimirov, I.G., and Kurdjukov, A.P, Stochastic Approach to H-Optimization, Proc. 33 IEEE Conf. Dec. Control., 1994, vol. 3, pp. 2249–2250.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vladimirov, I.G., Kurdyukov, A.P., and Semyonov, A.V, Anisotropy of Signals and the Entropy of Linear Stationary Systems, Dokl. Math., 1995, vol. 51, pp. 388–390.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vladimirov, I.G., Kurdjukov, A.P., and Semyonov, A.V, On Computing the Anisotropic Norm of Linear Discrete-Time-Invariant Systems, Proc. 13th IFAC World Congress, San-Francisco, USA, 1996, pp. 179–184.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vladimirov, I.G., Kurdjukov, A.P., and Semyonov, A.V., State-Space Solution to Anisotropy-Based Stochastic H-Optimization Problem, Proc. 13 IFAC World Congress, San Francisco, 1996, vol. H, pp. 427–432.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vladimirov, I.G., Kurdjukov, A.P., and Semyonov, A.V, Asymptotics of the Anisotropic Norm of Linear Time-Invariant Systems, Autom. Remote Control., 1999, vol. 60, no. 3, part 1, pp. 359–366.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vladimirov, I.G., Diamond, P., and Kloeden, P, Anisotropy-Based Robust Performance Analysis of Finite Horizon Linear Discrete Time Varying Systems, Autom. Remote Control., 2006, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1265–1282.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maximov, E.A., Kurdyukov, A.P., and Vladimirov, I.G, Anisotropy-Based Bounded Real Lemma for Linear Discrete Time Varying Systems, Proc. 18 IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, 2011, pp. 4701–4706.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurdyukov, A., Kustov, A., Tchaikovsky, M., and Karny, M, The Concept of Mean Anisotropy of Signals with Nonzero Mean, Proc. Int. Conf. Process Control, Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, 2013, pp. 37–41.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A., Elements of Information Theory, New York: Wiley,2005, 2nd ed.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diamond, P., Kloeden, P., and Vladimirov, I, Mean Anisotropy of Homogeneous Gaussian Random Fields and Anisotropic Norms of Linear Translation-Invariant Operators on Multidimensional Integer Lattices, J. Appl. Math. Stoch. Anal., 2003, vol. 16, pp. 209–231.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lofberg, J., YALMIP: A Toolbox for Modeling and Optimization in MATLAB, Proc. CACSD Conf., Taipei, Taiwan, 2004. http://users.isy.liu.se/johanl/yalmip/Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sturm, J.F, Using SeDuMi 1.02, A MATLAB Toolbox for Optimization over Symmetric Cones, Optim. Methods Software, 1999, vol. 11, pp. 625–653.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations