Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 77, Issue 7, pp 1248–1258 | Cite as

Problem of uniform deployment on a line segment for second-order agents

Navigation and Control Of Moving Systems

Abstract

Consideration was given to a special problem of controlling a formation of mobile agents, that of uniform deployment of several identical agents on a segment of the straight line. For the case of agents obeying the first-order dynamic model, this problem seems to be first formulated in 1997 by I.A. Wagner and A.M. Bruckstein as “row straightening.” In the present paper, the straightening algorithm was generalized to a more interesting case where the agent dynamics obeys second-order differential equations or, stated differently, it is the agent’s acceleration (or the force applied to it) that is the control.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ren, W. and Cao, W., Distributed Coordination of Multi-agent Networks, London: Springer, 2011.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mesbahi, M. and Egerstedt, M., Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2010.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antonelli, G., Interconnected Dynamic Systems. An Overview on Distributed Control, IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 2013, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 76–88.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agaev, R.P. and Chebotarev, P.Yu., Convergence and Stability in Problem of Coordination of Characteristics, Upravlen. Bol’shimi Sist., 2010, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 470–505.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ren, W. and Beard, R., Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control. Theory and Applications, London: Springer, 2008.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bullo, F., Cortes, J., and Martinez, S., Distributed Control of Robotics Networks, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 2009.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lafferriere, G., Williams, A., Caughman, J., et al., Decentralized Control of Vehicle Formations, Syst. & Control Lett., 2005, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 899–910.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olfati-Saber, R., Flocking for Multi-agent Dynamic Systems. Algorithms and Theory, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2006, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 401–420.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zavlanos, M.M., Egerstedt, M.B., and Pappas, G.J., Graph-theoretic Connectivity Control of Mobile Robot Networks, Proc. IEEE, 2011, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1525–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reynolds, C.W., Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model, Comput. Graphics, 1987, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwager, M., Rus, D., and Slotine, J.J., Unifying Geometric, Probabilistic, and Potential Field Approaches to Multi-robot Deployment, Int. J. Robot. Res., 2011, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 371–383.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ny, J.L., Ribeiro, A., and Pappas, G.J., Adaptive Communication-constrained Deployment of Unmanned Vehicle systems, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 2012, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 923–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, W. and Spong, M.W., Unified Cooperative Control of Multiple Agents on a Sphere for Different Spherical Patterns, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2014, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1283–1289.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., and Santoro, N., Self-deployment of Mobile Sensors on a Ring, Theor. Comput. Sci., 2008, vol. 402, no. 1, pp. 67–80.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elor, Y. and Bruckstein, A.M., Uniform Multi-agent Deployment on a Ring, Theor. Comput. Sci., 2011, vol. 412, no. 8–10, pp. 783–795.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cortes, J., Coverage Optimization and Spatial Load Balancing by Robotic Sensor Networks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2010, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 749–754.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pavone, M., Arsie, A., Frazzoli, E., et al., Distributed Algorithms for Environment Partitioning in Mobile Robotic Networks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2011, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1834–1848.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wagner, I.A. and Bruckstein, A.M., Row Straightening via Local Interactions, Circuits Syst. Signal Process., 1997, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 287–305.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elmachtoub, A.N. and van Loan, C.F., From Random Polygon to Ellipse. An Eigenanalysis, SIAM Rev., 2010, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 151–170.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shcherbakov, P.S., Formation Control. The Van Loan Scheme and Other Algorithms, Autom. Remote Control, 2011, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 681–696.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parsegov, S., Polyakov, A., and Shcherbakov, P., Nonlinear Fixed-time Control Protocol for Uniform Allocation of Agents on a Segment, Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 2012, pp. 7732–7737.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parsegov, S.E., Polyakov, A.E., and Shcherbakov, P.S., Nonlinear Fixed-time Control Protocol for Uniform Allocation of Agents on a Segment, Dokl. Math., 2013, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 133–136.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fradkov, A.L. and Grigor’ev, G.K., Decentralized Adaptive Control of Synchronization of Dynamic System Networks at Bounded Disturbances, Autom. Remote Control, 2013, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 829–844.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amelina, N.O. and Fradkov, A.L., Approximate Consensus in the Dynamic Stochastic Network with Incomplete Information and Measurement Delays, Autom. Remote Control, 2012, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1765–1783.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Proskurnikov, A.V., Frequency-domain Criteria for Consensus in Multiagent Systems with Nonlinear Sector-shaped Couplings, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1982–1995.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Proskurnikov, A.V., Nonlinear Consensus Algorithms with Uncertain Couplings, Asian J. Control, 2014, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1277–1288.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Proskurnikov, A.V., Consensus in Nonlinear Stationary Networks with Identical Agents, Autom. Remote Control, 2015, vol. 76, no. 9, pp. 1551–1565.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selivanov, A., Fradkov, A., and Fridman, E., Passification-based Decentralized Adaptive Synchronization of Dynamical Networks with Time-varying Delays, J. Franklin Inst., 2015, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 52–72.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kvinto, Y.I. and Parsegov, S.E., Equidistant Arrangement of Agents on Line. Analysis of the Algorithm and its Generalization, Autom. Remote Control, 2012, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 1784–1793.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramirez, J.L., Pavone, M., Frazzoli, E., et al., Distributed Control of Spacecraft Formations via Cyclic Pursuit. Theory and Experiments, AIAA J. Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 2010, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1655–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zheng, Y. and Wang, L., Consensus of Heterogeneous Multi-agent Systems without Velocity Measurements, Int. J. Control, 2012, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 906–914.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Voevodin, V.V. and Kuznetsov, Yu.A., Matritsy i vychisleniya (Matrices and Computations), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hara, S., Hayakawa, T., and Sugata, H., Stability Analysis of Linear Systems with Generalized Frequency Variables and Its Applications to Formation Control, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision Control, 2007, pp. 1459–1466.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Polyak, B.T. and Tsypkin, Y.Z., Stability and Robust Stability of Uniform Systems, Autom. Remote Control, 1996, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1606–1617.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Problems of Mechanical EngineeringRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.St. Petersburg State University of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and Optics (ITMO)St. PetersburgRussia
  4. 4.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations