Skip to main content
Log in

Informational influence and informational control models in social networks

  • Control Sciences
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We model the forming and dynamics of opinions in a social network with Markov chains. We set and solve, for a number of special cases, the problems of controlling agent opinions and game-theoretic problems of informational conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Reilly, T., What Is Web 2.0, URL: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (accessed on 30. 09. 2005).

  2. The Internet and the 2008 Election, URL: http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2008_election.pdf (accessed in December 2008).

  3. Krichevskii, R. and Dubovskaya, E., Psikhologiya maloi gruppy: teoreticheskii i prikladnoi aspekty (Small Group Psychology: Theory and Practice), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Myers, D., Social Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Watts, D. and Dodds, P., Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation, J. Consumer Research, December 2007, pp. 123–134.

  6. Granovetter, M., Threshold Models of Collective Behavior, Am. J. Sociology, 1978, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1420–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., and Tardos, E., Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network, Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, 2003, pp. 137–146.

  8. Morris, S., Contagion, Rev. Econ. Studies, 2000, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 57–78.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., and Muller, E., Talk of the Network: A complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-mouth, Marketing Lett., 2001, no. 2, pp. 11–34.

  10. Rolfe, M., Social Networks and Threshold Models of Collective Behavior, Preprint of Chicago Univ., Chicago, 2004.

  11. Gantmakher, F.R., Teoriya matrits (Theory of Matrices), Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Translated into English under the title Theory of Matrices, New York: Chelsea, 1959.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemeny, J.G. and Snell, J.L., Finite Markov Chains, New York: Springer, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gubko, M.V. and Novikov, D.A., Teoriya igr v upravlenii organizatsionnymi sistemami (Game Theory in Organizational Systems Control), Moscow: SINTEG, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shiryaev, A.N., Veroyatnost’ (Probability), 2 vols, Moscow: MTsNMO, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novikov, D.A., Teoriya upravleniya organizatsionnymi sistemami (Control Theory for Organizational Systems), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Novikov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Prikladnye modeli informatsionnogo upravleniya (Applied Informational Control Models), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dotsenko, E.L., Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita (Manipulation Psychology: Phenomena, Mechanisms, and Defense), Moscow: CheRo, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pocheptsov, G.G., Informatsionno-psikhologicheskaya voina (Information-psychological War), Moscow: SINTEG, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuznetsov, N.A., Kul’ba, V.V., Mikrin, E.A., et al., Informatsionnaya bezopasnost’ sistem organizatsionnogo upravleniya (Informational Security in Organizational Control Structures), Moscow: Nauka, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Novikov, D.A. and Chkhartishvili, A.G., Refleksivnye igry (Reflexive Games), Moscow: SINTEG, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Novikov, D.A., “Cognitive Games”: A Linear Impulse Model, Probl. Upravlen., 2008, no. 3, pp. 14–22.

  22. Aleskerov, F.T., Blagoveshchenskii, N.Yu., Satarov, G.A., et al., Vliyanie i strukturnaya ustoichivost’ v Rossiiskom parlamente (1905–1917 i 1993–2005 gg.) (Influence and Structural Stability in the Russian Parliament, 1905–1917 and 1993–2005), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Felsenthal, D. and Machover, M., The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, London: Edward Elgar, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M., A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, Am. Political Sci. Rev., 1954, vol. 48(3), pp. 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tikhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Ya., Metody resheniya nekorrektnykh zadach (Solving Ill-posed Problems), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.A. Gubanov, D.A. Novikov, A.G. Chkhartishvili, 2009, published in Problemy Upravleniya, 2009, No. 5, pp. 28–35.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gubanov, D.A., Novikov, D.A. & Chkhartishvili, A.G. Informational influence and informational control models in social networks. Autom Remote Control 72, 1557–1567 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117911070216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117911070216

Keywords

Navigation