Skip to main content
Log in

Strategies of voting in stochastic environment: Egoism and collectivism

  • Control in Social Economic Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consideration was given to a model of social dynamics controlled by successive collective decisions based on the threshold majority procedures. The current system state is characterized by the vector of participants’ capitals (utilities). At each step, the voters can either retain their status quo or accept the proposal which is a vector of the algebraic increments in the capitals of the participants. In this version of the model, the vector is generated stochastically. Comparative utility of two social attitudes—egoism and collectivism—was analyzed. It was established that, except for some special cases, the collectivists have advantages, which makes realizable the following scenario: on the conditions of protecting the corporate interests, a group is created which is joined then by the egoists attracted by its achievements. At that, group egoism approaches altruism. Additionally, one of the considered variants of collectivism handicaps manipulation of voting by the organizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mirkin, B.G., Problema gruppovogo vybora (Problem of Group Choice), Moscow: Nauka, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aizerman, M.A., Dynamic Aspects of the Voting Theory (Review of the Problem), Avtom. Telemekh., 1981, no. 12, pp. 103–118.

  3. Chebotarev, P.Yu., Some Properties of Trajectories in the Dynamic Problem of Voting, Avtom. Telemekh., 1986, no. 1, pp. 133–138.

  4. Aleskerov, F.T. and Orteshuk, P., Vybory. Golosovanie. Partii (Elections. Voting. Parties), Moscow: Akademiya, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borzenko, B.I., Lezina, Z.M., Lezina, I.B., et al., Model of Social Dynamics Defined by Collective Decisions and Random Environmental Changes, II Mezhdunar. konf. po probl. upr. Tez. dokl. (II Int. Conf. Control, Abstracts), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2003, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chebotarev, P.Yu., Borzenko, V.I., Lezina, Z.M., et al., Model of Social Dynamics Controlled by Collective Decisions, in Tr. Inst. probl. upr. RAN., (Proc. Int. Control Probl.), Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2004, vol. XXIII, pp. 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chebotarev, P.Ju., Borzenko, V.I., Lezina, Z.M., et al., A Model of Social Dynamics Governed by Collective Decisions, Proc. Int. Conf. “Math. Modelling of Social and Economic Dynamics” (MMSED-2004), Moscow: RSSU, 2004, pp. 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.I. Borzenko, Z.M. Lezina, A.K. Loginov, Ya. Yu. Tsodikova, P. Yu. Chebotarev, 2006, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2006, No. 2, pp. 154–173.

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 02-01-00614.

This paper was recommended for publication by F.T. Aleskerov, a member of the Editorial Board

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borzenko, V.I., Lezina, Z.M., Loginov, A.K. et al. Strategies of voting in stochastic environment: Egoism and collectivism. Autom Remote Control 67, 311–328 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117906020093

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117906020093

PACS number

Navigation