Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between Permeability, Porosity, and Microstructure of Sea Ice in Amur Bay Based on In-Situ Measurements and Magnetic Resonance Tomography

  • MARINE PHYSICS
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study on the microstructure of fast sea ice in Amur Bay for 2013–2018 based on hydrological observations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the results of calculating the effective and total porosity and permeability of ice cores and their relationship. The profiles and average values of ice permeability and Rayleigh number are calculated from temperature and salinity measurements taking into account the total and effective porosity of the cores. These are compared with the results of a study of the same characteristics for ice in polar regions. The values of the permeability threshold and critical Rayleigh number for the ice of Amur Bay are discussed. MRI images of cores with different permeability characteristics and Rayleigh numbers are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Bogorodskii and V. P. Gavrilo, “Ice,” in Physical Properties. Modern Methods of Glaciology (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1980), pp. 352–375.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Yu. Lazaryuk, V. B. Lobanov, and V. I. Ponomaryov, “Evolution of thermohaline structure of waters of the Amur Bay in cold season,” Vest. Dal’nevost. Otdel. Ross. Akad. Nauk No. 6, 59—70 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Mel’nichenko, A. V. Tyveev, A. Yu. Lazaryuk, et al., “Vertical distribution of brine and volume structure of thin annual ice in Amursky Bay based on the methods of nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging,” Oceanology 59, 777—786 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. Nazintsev and V. V. Panov, Phase Composition and Thermophysical Characteristics of Sea Ice (Gidrometeoizdat, St. Petersburg, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Büttner, PhD Thesis (Geophys. Univ., Bergen, 2011).

  6. G. Carnat, T. Papakyriakou, N. X. Geilfus, et al., “Investigation on physical and textural properties of Arctic first-year sea ice in Amundsen Gulf, Canada, November 2007–June 2008 (IPY-CFL system study),” J. Glaciol. 59, 819–837 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. F. N. Cox and W. F. Weeks, “Equations for determining the gas and brine volumes in sea-ice samples,” J. Glaciol. 29, 306–316 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Crabeck, R. Galley, B. Delille, et al., “Imaging air volume fraction in sea ice using non-destructive X-ray tomography,” The Cryosphere 10, 1125–1145 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Freitag, “The hydraulic properties of Arctic sea ice-implication for the small-scale particle transport,” Ber. Zur Polarforsch. 325 (1999);

  10. PhD Thesis (Univ. Bremen, 1999).

  11. R. J. Galley, B. G. T. Else, N.-X. Geilfus, et al., “Imaged brine inclusions in young sea ice – Shape, distribution and formation timing,” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 111, 39–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. M. Golden, S. F. Ackley, and V. I. Lytle, “Percolation phase transition in sea ice,” Science 282, 2238–2241 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. M. Golden, H. Eicken, A. L. Heaton, et al., “Thermal evolution of permeability and microstructure in sea ice,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L6501 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Notz and M. G. Worster, “Desalination processes of sea ice revisited,” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 114, C05006 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Petrich and H. Eicken, “Growth, Structure and Properties of Sea Ice,” in Sea Ice (Willey-Blackwell, Oxford, 2010), pp. 23–77.

  16. C. Petrich, P. J. Langhorne, and Z. F. Sun, “Modelling the interrelationships between permeability, effective porosity and total porosity in sea ice,” Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 44, 131–144 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Scott and D. L. Feltham, “A model of three-dimensional evolution of Arctic melt ponds on first-year multiyear sea ice,” J. Geophys. Res. 115, C12 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. S. Wettlaufer, M. G. Worster, and H. E. Huppert, “The phase evolution of young sea ice,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 1251–1254 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was carried out within a state assignment (topic no. 121021700346-7 “Investigation of the Main Processes Controlling the State and Variability of Oceanological Characteristics of the Marginal Seas of Asia and Adjacent Regions of the Pacific and Indian Oceans”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to N. A. Melnichenko, A. V. Tyuveev, A. Yu. Lazaryuk, E. V. Kustova or P. O. Kharlamov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melnichenko, N.A., Tyuveev, A.V., Lazaryuk, A.Y. et al. Relationship between Permeability, Porosity, and Microstructure of Sea Ice in Amur Bay Based on In-Situ Measurements and Magnetic Resonance Tomography. Oceanology 62, 464–470 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437022040166

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437022040166

Keywords:

Navigation