, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 38–44 | Cite as

Riddle of the Nautilus: Specific Structural Features of Its Shell

  • D. A. PetrochenkovEmail author
  • A. A. Veligzhanin
  • D. I. Frey
  • A. A. Chernyshov
Marine Biology


The shells of the chambered nautilus (Nautilus pompilius) are studied by X-ray structure analysis (XRD) and electron microscopy (SEM and TEM). The shell structure is examined in a nanometer scale using XRD and synchrotron-based small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The mineral composition of shells includes 98–99 wt % aragonite, ~1 wt % organic substance (conchiolin), 1 wt % strontianite, and 0.5 wt % calcite. Trace elements comprise Na, Mg, Al, K, Si, Fe, P, S, Zn, Sr, Ba, and Cl. The laminated layers are composed of aragonite crystals with a width of 5–10 μm and a thickness of 0.5–1 μm; the prismatic layers, with a length of 7–12 μm long and a width of 1–3 μm. According to XRD and SAXS assays, the aragonite layers are formed of flawless monocrystals lacking any internal structuring. The shell conchiolin is a polymer formed of a system of parallel fibers folded with a step of approximately 100 nm without longitudinal structuring. Presumably, the unique structure of the nautilus shells has determined the existence of Nautiloidea over 500 Ma and their preservation as fossils for over 100 Ma.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. A. Veligzhanin, D. A. Petrochenkov, E. V. Khramov, D. I. Frey, and A. A. Chernyshov, “Synchrotron x-ray diffraction and small-angle x-ray scattering analyses of the nacre of the Nautilus shell,” J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 10, 198–204 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. E. Ershov, Amazing World of Shells (Del’ta, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. A. Mikhailova and O. B. Bondarenko, Paleontology (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1997), Part1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. A. Petrochenkov, “Mineralogical and structural features of fossil nacre of ammonite shells,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., No. 4, 84–86 (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. A. Petrochenkov, “Gemological aspects of the Upper Devonian jewelry-ornamental ammonites from Morocco,” Proceedings of XII International Scientific-Practical Conference “New Scientific Concepts about Earth” (Russian State Geological Prospecting Univ., Moscow, 2015), Vol. 1, pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Li, W.-C. Chang, Y. J. Chao, et al., “Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of a natural nanocomposite materials: the shell of red abalone,” NanoLett. 4 (4), 613–617 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. M. Luz and J. F. Mano, “Biomimetic design of materials and biomaterial inspired by the structure of nacre,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 367, 1587–1605 (2009). doi 10.1098/rsta.2009.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. C. Olson, R. Kozdon, J. W. Valley, and P. U. Gilbert, “Mollusk shell nacre ultrastructure correlates with environmental temperature and pressure,” J. Am Chem. Soc. 134, 7351–7358 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Chen, C. Wang, Y. Huang, and H. Le, “An efficient biomimetic process for fabrication of artificial nacre with ordered-nanostructure,” Mater. Sci. Eng., C 28, 218–222 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Petrochenkov
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. A. Veligzhanin
    • 2
  • D. I. Frey
    • 3
  • A. A. Chernyshov
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian State Geological Prospecting UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Research Center Kurchatov InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations