Oceanology

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 229–231 | Cite as

Global historical archive of wind waves based on Voluntary Observing Ship data

Marine Physics
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

A new global archive of wind wave characteristics has been developed based on Voluntary Observing Ship (VOS) data for the period of 1888–2015. In addition to the basic meteorological variables, we have derived the records of visually observed heights, periods, and wind sea and swell directions. The main parameters have been supplemented by significant wave height and dominant period estimates, as well as wave geometry characteristics: steepness, wave age, and wavelength. Multistage quality control has been applied to correct or eliminate spurious values. Data are presented as individual records for every month and as original monthly means fields for every parameter. Easy access and use, along with representative data, make the new archive particularly special and applicable in different ways without any additional preprocessing. Visual wave observations assimilated in the new archive can be used to develop global and regional climatologies, estimate extreme wave characteristics and long-term trends in wave climate, verify and compare them with satellite measurements and model analysis, and test the theoretical laws of ocean wave development and propagation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. V. Gavrikov, M. A. Krinitsky, and V. G. Grigorieva, “Modification of Globwave satellite altimetry database for sea wave field diagnostics,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 56, 301–306 (2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. G. Grigorieva, Candidate’s Dissertation in Physics-Mathematics (Moscow, 2006).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Yu. Lavrova, A. G. Kostyanoi, S. A. Lebedev, et al., Complex Satellite Monitoring of Russian Seas (Institute of Space Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian]. ISBN 978-5-9903101-1-7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. I. Badulin and V. G. Grigorieva, “On discriminating swell and wind-driven seas in voluntary observing ship data,” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 117, 1–13 (2012). doi 10.1029/2012JC007937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, et al., “The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system,” Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011). doi 10.1002/qj.828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Gilhousen, “Improvement in National Buoy Center measurements,” in Achievements in Marine Climatology, Ed. by V. Swail (Environment-Canada, Toronto, 1999), pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. K. Gulev and V. Grigorieva, “Last century changes in ocean wind wave height from global visual wave data,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L24302 (2004). doi 10.1029/2004GL021040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. K. Gulev, V. Grigorieva, A. Sterl, and D. Woolf, “Assessment of the reliability of wave observations from voluntary observing ships: Insights from the validation of a global wind wave climatology based on voluntary observing ship data,” J. Geophys. Res., C: Oceans Atmos. 108 (7), 3236–3257 (2003). doi 10.1029/2002JC001437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. K. Gulev and L. Hasse, “North Atlantic wind waves and wind stress fields from voluntary observing data,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28 (6), 1107–1130 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. K. Gulev, T. Jung, and E. Ruprecht, “Estimation of the impact of sampling errors in the VOS observations on air-sea fluxes. Part I. Uncertainties in climate means,” J. Clim. 20, 279–301 (2007). doi 10.1175/JCLI4010.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. C. Wilkerson and M. D. Earle, “A study of differences between environmental reports by ships in the voluntary observing program and measurements from NOAA buoys,” J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans 95 (3), 3373–3385 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. D. Woodruff, S. J. Worley, S. J. Lubker, et al., “ICOADS Release 2.5: extensions and enhancements to the surface marine meteorological archive,” Int. J. Climatol. 31 (7), 951–967 (2011). doi 10.1002/joc.2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Zieger, J. Vinoth, and I. R. Young, “Joint calibration of multiplatform altimeter measurements of wind speed and wave height over the past 20 years,” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 26, 2549–2564 (2009). doi 10.1175/2009JTECHA1303.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. G. Grigorieva
    • 1
  • S. K. Gulev
    • 1
  • A. V. Gavrikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations