Oceanology

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 245–252 | Cite as

A method of accounting for tidal changes in regional climates of a water basin under conditions of an ice-free Barents Sea

Marine Physics
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

To account for tidal variations in the regional climate of a water basin, we propose adding up the vertical eddy diffusivity, determined by wind and thermohaline forcings, and the diapycnal diffusivity, determined from the solution to the problem of the internal tidal wave (ITW) dynamics. This approach agrees with the approximation of “weak interaction” between turbulence of various origins. Then, the hydrothermodynamics equations are integrated with and without regard for ITW-induced diapycnal diffusion until a quasistationary solution is reached. Next we compare these solutions, found by using the 3D finite-element hydrostatic model QUODDY-4. This comparison shows that the contribution of tides to the formation of the Barents Sea climate in summer is not negligible with respect to certain hydrological characteristics. We present the fields of the dynamic topography of a free surface, surface current velocities, and seawater temperature and salinity at the depth of the pycnocline in the sea to illustrate the occurrence of tidal effects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the Soviet Union Seas, Vol. 2: The White Sea, No. 1: Hydrometeorological Conditions, Ed. by F. S. Terziev, (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1990) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Zaslavskii and R. Z. Sagdeev, Introduction to Nonlinear Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. A. Kagan and E. V. Sofina, “Effect of the tidal mixing on the average climatic characteristics of the Barents Sea,” Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 51 (6), 651–660 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. P. Novitskii, “Constant currents of the northern part of Barents Sea,” Tr. Gos. Okeanogr. Inst., No. 64, 1–32 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO, 2008). http://www.ibcao.org/.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. T. C. Ip and D. R. Lynch, QUODDY-3 User’s Manual: Comprehensive Coastal Circulation Simulation Using Finite Elements. Nonlinear Prognostic Time-Stepping Model (Thayler School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. R. Jayne, “The impact of abyssal mixing parameterizations in an ocean general model,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39 (7), 1756–1775 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. R. Jayne and L. C. St. Laurent, “Parameterizing tidal dissipation over rough topography,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 28 (5), 811–814 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. A. Kagan and E. V. Sofina, “Surface and internal semidiurnal tides and tidally induced diapycnal diffusion in the Barents Sea: a numerical study,” Cont. Shelf Res. 91, 158–170 (2014). doi 10.1016/j.csr.2014.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Kistler, E. Kalnay, W. Collins, et al., “The NCEPNCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation,” Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 82, 247–267 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Loeng and S. Sundby, “Drifting Argos buoys in the Barents Sea,” Counc. Meet., Int. Counc. Explor. Sea, 19 (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. L. Mellor and T. Yamada, “Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems,” Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20 (4), 854–875 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Mueller, H. Haak, J. H. Jungclaus, et al., “The effect of ocean tides on a climate model simulation,” Ocean Model. 35 (4), 304–313 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Padman and S. Erofeeva, “A barotropic inverse tidal model for the Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. Res. Let. 31 (2), (2004). doi 10.1029/2003GL019003Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. H. Rio, S. Guinehut, and G. Larnicol, “New CNES-CLS09 global mean dynamic topography computed from the combination of GRACE data, altimetry, and in situ measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 116 (C07018), (2011). doi doi 10.1029/2010JC006505Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. A. Saenko, “The effect of localized mixing on the ocean circulation and time-dependent climate change,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36 (2), 140–160 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. A. Saenko and W. J. Merryfield, “On the effect of topographically enhanced mixing on the global ocean circulation,” J. Phys. Oceanogr. 35 (5), 826–834 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. L. Simmons, S. R. Jayne, L. C. St. Laurent, and A. J. Weaver, “Tidally driven mixing in a numerical model of the ocean general circulation,” Ocean Model. 6 (3–4), 245–263 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Slagstad, K. Stole-Hansen, and H. Loeng, “Density driven currents in the Barents Sea calculated by a numerical model,” Model., Identif. Control 11 (4), 181–190 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations,” Month. Weather Rev. 91 (3), 99–164 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Joint US-Russian Atlas of the Arctic Ocean, Oceanography Atlas for the Summer Period, Ed. by E. Tanis and L. Timokhov (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg BranchShirshov Institute of OceanologySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Russian State Hydrometeorological UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations