A method of accounting for tidal changes in regional climates of a water basin under conditions of an ice-free Barents Sea
- 26 Downloads
To account for tidal variations in the regional climate of a water basin, we propose adding up the vertical eddy diffusivity, determined by wind and thermohaline forcings, and the diapycnal diffusivity, determined from the solution to the problem of the internal tidal wave (ITW) dynamics. This approach agrees with the approximation of “weak interaction” between turbulence of various origins. Then, the hydrothermodynamics equations are integrated with and without regard for ITW-induced diapycnal diffusion until a quasistationary solution is reached. Next we compare these solutions, found by using the 3D finite-element hydrostatic model QUODDY-4. This comparison shows that the contribution of tides to the formation of the Barents Sea climate in summer is not negligible with respect to certain hydrological characteristics. We present the fields of the dynamic topography of a free surface, surface current velocities, and seawater temperature and salinity at the depth of the pycnocline in the sea to illustrate the occurrence of tidal effects.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the Soviet Union Seas, Vol. 2: The White Sea, No. 1: Hydrometeorological Conditions, Ed. by F. S. Terziev, (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1990) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 2.G. M. Zaslavskii and R. Z. Sagdeev, Introduction to Nonlinear Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
- 4.V. P. Novitskii, “Constant currents of the northern part of Barents Sea,” Tr. Gos. Okeanogr. Inst., No. 64, 1–32 (1967).Google Scholar
- 5.International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO, 2008). http://www.ibcao.org/.Google Scholar
- 6.J. T. C. Ip and D. R. Lynch, QUODDY-3 User’s Manual: Comprehensive Coastal Circulation Simulation Using Finite Elements. Nonlinear Prognostic Time-Stepping Model (Thayler School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 1995).Google Scholar
- 11.H. Loeng and S. Sundby, “Drifting Argos buoys in the Barents Sea,” Counc. Meet., Int. Counc. Explor. Sea, 19 (1989).Google Scholar
- 14.L. Padman and S. Erofeeva, “A barotropic inverse tidal model for the Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. Res. Let. 31 (2), (2004). doi 10.1029/2003GL019003Google Scholar
- 15.M. H. Rio, S. Guinehut, and G. Larnicol, “New CNES-CLS09 global mean dynamic topography computed from the combination of GRACE data, altimetry, and in situ measurements,” J. Geophys. Res. 116 (C07018), (2011). doi doi 10.1029/2010JC006505Google Scholar
- 21.Joint US-Russian Atlas of the Arctic Ocean, Oceanography Atlas for the Summer Period, Ed. by E. Tanis and L. Timokhov (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 1998).Google Scholar