Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematics of the bottom of the Eurasia Basin near the Spitsbergen domain

  • Marine Geology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

Prior to extension of the lithosphere in the Eurasia Basin, the Yermak Plateau was an element of the Eurasian Arctic margin. Extension of the Barents Sea shelf culminated gradually in rifting of the continental crust with separation of this block from the continent during Chrons C25r‒C26n (57.656‒59.237 Ma ago) and emplacement of numerous basic dikes, which could be responsible for the formation of high-amplitude magnetic anomalies on the Yermak Plateau. The investigation included reconstruction of axes in the breakup zones along peripheral continental fragments of Spitsbergen with determination of the Euler poles and angles of rotation, which describe the kinematics of this process. It is revealed that the difference between depths of conjugate isobaths can be as large as many tens of meters, which reflects the nonuniformly scaled slide of peripheral areas of the continental crust along the plane of the crustal-penetrating fault and, correspondingly, their different subsidence during rifting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Yu. Glebovsky, V. D. Kaminsky, A. N. Minakov, S. A. Merkur’ev, V. A. Childers, and J. M. Brozena, “Formation of the Eurasia basin in the arctic ocean as inferred from geohistorical analysis of the anomalous magnetic field,” Geotectonics 40 (4), 263–281 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. D. Zonenshtein, M. G. Lomize, and A. G. Ryabukhin, Practical Manual on Geotectonics (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. I. Filatova and V. E. Khain, “The Arctida Craton and Neoproterozoic-Mesozoic orogenic belts of the circum-polar region,” Geotectonics 44 (3), 203–227 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Schreider, “Linear magnetic anomalies in the Arctic Ocean,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 44 (5), 721–729 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al. A. Schreider, “Model of the separation of the Marvin Spur from the Lomonosov Ridge in the Arctic Ocean,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 54 (4), 490–496 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Alvey, C. Gaina, N. Kuszner, and T. Torsvik, “Integrated crustal thickness mapping and plate reconstructions for the high Arctic,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 274, 310–321 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Brozena, V. Childers, L. Lawver, et al., “New aerogeophysical study of the Eurasian Basin and Lomonosov Ridge implications for basin development,” Geology 31, 825–828 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Coles and P. Taylor, “Magnetic anomalies,” in Geology of North America (Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1990), Vol. 1, pp. 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Dore, E. Lundin, N. Kusznir, and C. Pascal, “Potential mechanisms for the genesis of Cenozoic domal structures on the NE Atlantic margins,” Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 306, 1–26 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Dossing, L. Stemmerik, T. Dahl-Jensen, and V. Schlindwein, “Segmentation of the eastern north Greenland oblique shear margin-regional plate tectonic implications,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292, 239–253 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O. Engen, J. A. Gjengedal, J. Faleide, et al., “Seismic stratigraphy and sediment thickness of the Nansen basin, Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. J. Int. 176, 805–821 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O. Engen, J. Faleide, and T. Dyreng, “Opening of the Fram Strait gateway: a review of plate tectonic constraints,” Tectonophysics 450, 51–69 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Engen, J. I. Faleide, F. Tsikalas, et al., “Structure of the west and north Svalbard margins in a plate tectonic setting,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Arctic Margins (Dartmouth, Canada, 2003), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Geissler and W. Jokat, “A geophysical study of the northern Svalbard continental margin,” Geophys. J. Int. 158, 50–66 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Geissler, W. Jokat, and H. Brekke, “The Yermak plateau in the Arctic ocean in the light of reflection seismic data–implication for its tectonic and sedimentary evolution,” Geophys. J. Int. 187, 1334–1362 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Gradstein, J. Ogg, M. Schmitz, and G. Ogg, The Geologic Timescale 2012 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Jackson and G. Johnson, “Summary of arctic geophysics,” J. Geodyn. 6, 245–262 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Jokat and U. Micksch, “The sedimentary structure of Nansen and Amundsen basins, Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L02603 (2004). doi 10.1029/2003/GL018352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Knies, J. Matthiessen, C. Vogt, et al., “The Plio-Pleistocene glaciation of the Barents Sea–Svalbard region: a new model based on revised chronostratigraphy,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 812–829 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Knies, J. Matthiessen, K. Fabian, et al., “Effect of early Pliocene uplift on late Pliocene cooling in the Arctic-Atlantic gateway,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 387, 132–144 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Kristoffersen and E. Husebye, “Multi-channel seismic reflection measurements in the Eurasian Basin, Arctic Ocean, from U.S. ice station FRAM-IV,” Tectonophysics 114, 103–115 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Lawver, A. Grantz, and L. Gahagan, “Plate kinematic evolution of the present Arctic region since the Ordovician,” Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 360, 333–358 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Lebedeva-Ivanova, Geophysical Studies Bearing on the Origin of the Arctic Ocean Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology (Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Minakov, J. Faleide, V. Glebovsky, and R. Mjelde, “Structure and evolution of the northern Barents Kara sea continental margin from integrated analysis of potential fields, bathymetry and sparse seismical data,” Geophys. J. Int. 188, 79–102 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Mosar, G. Lewis, and T. Torsvik, “North Atlantic seafloor spreading rates: implication for the tertiary development of inversion structures of the Norwegian–Greenland Sea,” J. Geol. Soc. London 159, 503–515 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Nafe and C. Drake, “Variation with depth in shallow and deep water marine sediments of porosity, density and the velocity of compressional and shear waves,” Geophysics 22, 523–552 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ocean Drilling Program Initial Report Leg 151 (College Station, TX, 1995).

  28. Ocean Drilling Program Initial Report Leg (College Station, TX, 1999).

  29. N. Okay and K. Crane, “Thermal rejuvenation of the Ermak plateau,” Mar. Geophys. Res. 15, 243–263 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O. Ritzmann and W. Jokat, “Crustal structure of northwestern Svalbard and the adjacent Yermak Plateau: evidence for Oligocene detachment tectonics and nonvolcanic breakup,” Geophys. J. Int. 152, 139–159 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O. Ritzmann, W. Jokat, W. Czuba, et al., “A deep seismic transect from Hovgard Ridge to northwestern Svalbard across the continental-ocean transition: a sheared margin study,” Geophys. J. Int. 157, 683–702 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Taylor, L. Kovacs, P. Vogt, and G. Johnson, “Detailed aeromagnetic investigations of the Arctic Basin,” J. Geophys. Res. 86, 6323–6333 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Urlaub, M. Schmidt-Aursch, W. Jokat, and N. Kaul, “Gravity crustal models and heat flow measurements for the Eurasia basin, Arctic ocean,” Mar. Geophys. Res. 30, 277–292 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Vogt, “Magnetic anomalies and crustal magnetization,” in The Western North Atlantic Region (Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 1986), pp. 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. Vogt, P. Taylor, L. Kovacs, and G. Johnson, “Detailed aeromagnetic investigation of the Arctic Basin,” J. Geophys. Res. 84, 1071–1089 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. E. Weigelt and W. Jokat, “Peculiarities of roughness and thickness of oceanic crust in the Eurasia Basin, Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. J. Int. 145, 505–516 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. D. Winkelmann, W. Jokat, F. Niessen, et al., “Age and extent of the Yermak slide north of Spitsbergen, Arctic Ocean,” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7 (6), Q06007 (2006). doi 10.1029/2005GC001130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Wernicke, “Low angle normal faults in the Basin and Range Province: nape tectonics in an extending orogeny,” Nature 291, 645–648 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Satellite geodesy, International bathymetric chart of the Arctic Ocean, 2014. http://www.topex.ucsd.edu/html/mar_topo.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Al. A. Schreider.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Al.A. Schreider, A.A. Schreider, A.E. Sazhneva, V.A. Sychev, O.A. Zuev, 2016, published in Okeanologiya, 2016, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 791–803.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schreider, A.A., Schreider, A.A., Sazhneva, A.E. et al. Kinematics of the bottom of the Eurasia Basin near the Spitsbergen domain. Oceanology 56, 721–732 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701604010X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701604010X

Navigation