Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Causes of different impact of Major Baltic Inflows on cod reproduction in the Gotland Basin of the Baltic Sea

  • Marine Biology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The impact of the Major Baltic Inflows (MBIs) of 1976, 1993, and 2003 on cod reproduction in the Gotland Basin of the Baltic Sea is considered based on calculations of the eastern Baltic cod egg abundance and offspring survival indices. The reproductive success (1976–1977) was defined by the elevation of the 11 psu isohaline and deepening of the 2 mL/L isooxygene surface, which provided the formation of a water layer suitable for cod spawning at a depth of 90–130 m. Prerequisites of the appearance of the reproductive layer in 1976–1977 were a previously high salinity level and penetrating two successive MBIs in one year. The cause of the weak MBI impact in 1993 was the previous salinity minimum; in 2003 it was rapid oxygen depletion due to an increase in temperature. As a result of their weaker influence, small and fragmented cod spawning biotopes appeared in the Gotland Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. E. Antonov, Large-Scale Variability of Hydrological Regime of the Baltic Sea and Its Influence on Fishing (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. F. Dement’eva, V. M. Naumov, and D. V. Radakov, The Baltic Sea Cod (Pishchepromizdat, Moscow, 1951) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. M. Zhurbas and V. T. Paka, “Numerical modeling of salt water distribution in the eastern Gotland basin following the major inflow of North Sea water,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 9, 43–51 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. M. Zhurbas, I. S. Oh, and V. T. Paka, “Generation of mesoscale cyclonic eddies in the Baltic Sea during the inflows of the North Sea water,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 42 (6), 765–774 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. S. Zezera and E. A. Gribov, “Advection of the North Sea waters to the Baltic Sea in 2003,” Tr. Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. 1, 103–115 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. S. Zezera, “Long-term changes of abiotic conditions in the Baltic Sea (in 1975–2007),” Tr. Atlant. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr. 1, 103–115 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. I. Kazanova, “The materials on fish reproduction in the Baltic Sea,” Dokl. Vses. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Ryb. Okeanogr., No. 1, 55–70 (1952) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. M. Karaseva, “The abundance and patterns of the egg and larval spatial distribution of Eastern Baltic cod Gadus morhua callarias (Gadidae) in 1931–1996,” J. Ichthyol. 53 (3), 199–208 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. P. Kuzmina, V. M. Zhurbas, B. Rudels, T. Stipa, V. T. Paka,, and S. S. Muraviev, “Role of eddies and intrusions in the exchange processes in the Baltic halocline,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 48 (2), 149–158 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. A. Lablaika, S. A. Khozioskii, and M. V. Kaleis, “The effect of some parameters of stock and environment on recruitment abundance of the eastern Baltic population of cod,” Fish.-Forsch. 22 (3), 23–26 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Alheit, C. Moellmann, J. Dutz, G. Kornilovs, et al., “Synchronous ecological regime shifts in the central Baltic and the North Sea in the late 1980s,” Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1858–1873 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mechanisms Influencing Long Term Trends in Reproductive Success and Recruitment of Baltic Cod: Implication for Fisheries Management: CORE Program Final Report, EU Commission DGXIV, Part II (European Commission, Brussels, 1998), No. CT94-1226, p. 526

  13. G. B. Grauman and E. Yula, “The importance of abiotic and biotic factors in the early ontogenesis of cod and sprat,” Rapp. P.-V. Reun.–Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 190, 207–210 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. R. Dickson, “The prediction of major Baltic inflows,” Dtsch. Hydrogrol. Z. 26, 97–105 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Feistel, G. Nausch, W. Matthäus, and E. Hagen, “Temporal and spatial evolution of the Baltic deep water renewal in spring 2003,” Oceanologia 45 (4), 623–642 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Fisher and W. Matthaus, “The importance of the Drogden Sill in the sound for major Baltic inflows,” J. Mar. Syst. 9, 137–157 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Franck, W. Matthaus, and R. Sammler, “Major Baltic inflows during this century,” Beitr. Meereskd. 56, 81–82 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.-H. Hinrichsen, B. Huver, A. Makarchouk, et al., “Climate-driven long-term trends in Baltic Sea oxygen concentrations and the potential consequences for eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua),” ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68 (10), 2019–2028 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group, in ICES Conference and Meeting 2014/ACOM: 10 (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, 2014).

  20. F. W. Koester, C. Moellmann, H.-H. Hinrichsen et al., “Baltic cod recruitment—the impact of climate variability on key processes,” ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1408–1425 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I. A. Lablaika, “Cod fisheries and the composition of the stock in the eastern Baltic in 1965,” Ann. Biol. 22, 91–92 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Mankowski, “Badania macroplanktonu poludniowego Baltiku w latach 1952–1955,” Pr. Morsk. Inst. Rybackiego, Ser. A 10, 69–131 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Matthaus, “The history of investigations of salt water inflows into the Baltic Sea—from the early beginning to recent results,” Meereswiss. Ber., No. 65, 1–73 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Moellmann, R. Dieckmann, B. Mueller-Karulis, et al., “Reorganization of a large marine ecosystem due to atmospheric and anthropogenic pressure: a discontinuous regime shift in the Central Baltic Sea,” Global Change Biol. 15, 1377–1393 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. V. Mohrholz, J. Dutz, and G. Kraus, “The impact of exceptionally warm summer inflow events on the environmental conditions in the Bornholm Basin,” J. Mar. Syst. 60, 285–301 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Nehring and E. Franke, “Die Erneuerung des Tiefenwassers und andere Hydrographisch-chemische Veränderungen in der Ostsee im Jahre 1976,” Fisch. Forsch. 16 (2), 15–24 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Schinke and W. Matthäus, “On the causes of major Baltic inflows—an analysis of long time series,” Cont. Shelf Res. 18, 67–97 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Wieland, A. Jarre-Teichmann, and K. Horbova, “Changes in the timing of spawning of Baltic cod: possible causes and implications for recruitment,” ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 452–454 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. S. Zezera, “Main feature of the south-eastern Baltic Sea hydrological regime in 2000 and the latest retrospectives,” in ICES Conference and Meeting 2001/W:21, Oslo, Norway (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, 2001), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  30. V. M. Zhurbas and V. T. Paka, “Mesoscale thermohaline variability in the Eastern Gotland Basin following the 1993 major Baltic inflow,” J. Geophys. Res., C: Oceans Atmos. 102 (9), 20917–20926 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Karaseva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.M. Karaseva, A.S. Zezera, 2016, published in Okeanologiya, 2016, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 708–719.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karaseva, E.M., Zezera, A.S. Causes of different impact of Major Baltic Inflows on cod reproduction in the Gotland Basin of the Baltic Sea. Oceanology 56, 643–654 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437016040068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437016040068

Navigation