Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical significance and climatic role of the Global Atmospheric Oscillation

  • Marine Physics
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The statistical significance of Global Atmospheric Oscillation (GAO), whose main element is the well-known El Niño–Southern Oscillation in the equatorial Pacific, was assessed from monthly mean atmospheric pressure data at sea level at the nodes of a regular 5° × 5° grid covering the entire surface of the Earth. The data were collected in 1920–2012. It was found that statistically reliable GAO signals cover almost the entire tropical zone and they also appear at mid- and high latitudes of both hemispheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. I. Byshev, V. G. Neiman, Yu. A. Romanov, and I. V. Serykh, “Global character of El Niño,” Sovrem. Probl. Distantsionnogo Zondirovaniya Zemli Kosmosa, in the Earth 8 (4), 200–208 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Byshev, V. G. Neiman, Yu. A. Romanov, and I. V. Serykh, “El Niño as a consequence of the global oscillation in the dynamics of the Earth’s climatic system,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 446 (1), 1089–1094 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. S. Kozlenko, I. I. Mokhov, and D. A. Smirnov, “Analysis of the cause and effect relationships between El Niño in the Pacific and its analog in the equatorial Atlantic,” Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 45 (6), 704–713 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. N. Koshlyakov, Yu. A. Romanov, and A. A. Romanov, “El Niño-southern oscillation and the iceberg distribution in the Pacific sector of the Antarctic,” Oceanology (Engl. Transl.) 38 (4), 437–446 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Allan and T. J. Ansell, “A new globally-complete monthly historical gridded mean sea level pressure data set (HadSLP2): 1850–2004,” J. Clim. 19, 5816–5846 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Ayers and P. G. Strutton, “Nutrient variability in subantarctic mode waters forced by the southern annular mode and ENSO,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3419–3423 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Bailey, “Temperature anomalies in high northerly latitudes and their link with the El Niño/Southern oscillation,” Ann. Geophys. 16 (7), 1523–1526 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. P. Berlage, “Fluctuations of the general atmospheric circulation of more than one year, their nature and prognostic value,” Moded. Verh., No. 69, 1–52 (1957a).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. P. Berlage, “The southern oscillation and world weather,” Moded. Verh., No. 88, 83–99 (1957a).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Bjerkness, “Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific,” Mon. Weather Rev. 97 (3), 163–172 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boschat G., Terray P., and Masson S., “Extratropical forcing of ENSO,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1605–1611 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Broennimann, A. Stitcher, T. Griesser, et al., “Variability of large-scale atmospheric circulation indices for the northern hemisphere during the past 100 years,” Meteorol. Z. 18 (4), 379–396 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Chang, Y. Fang, R. Saravanan, et al., “The cause of the fragile relationship between the Pacific El Niño and the Atlantic Niño,” Nature 443, 324–328 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O. De Viron, J. O. Dikcey, and M. Ghil, “Global modes of climate variability,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1832–1837 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. F. Diaz, M. P. Hoeling, and J. K. Eischeid, “ENSO variability, teleconnections, and climate change,” Int. J. Climatol. 21, 1845–1862 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. S. Halpert and C. F. Ropelewski, “Surface–temperature patterns associated with the Southern Oscillation,” J. Clim. 5 (6), 577–593 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.-G. Ham, J.-S. Kug, and J.-Y. Park, “Two distinct roles of Atlantic SSTs in ENSO variability: north tropical Atlantic SST and Atlantic Niño,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4012–4017 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. C. Handoh, G. R. Bigg, A. J. Matthews, and D. P. Stevens, “Interannual variability of the tropical Atlantic independent of and associated with ENSO: Part II. The south tropical Atlantic,” Int. J. Climatol. 26, 1957–1976 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Jevrejeva, J. C. Moore, and A. Grinsted, “Influence of the Arctic oscillation and El-Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on ice conditions in the Baltic Sea: the wavelet approach,” J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4677 (2003). doi 10.1029/2003jD003417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. D. Jones, D. H. Liste, T. J. Osborn, et al., “Hemispheric and large-scale land surface air temperature variations: An extensive revision and an update to 2010,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 117 (05127), (2012). doi 1029/2011j017139

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. S. Keenlyside, H. Ding, and M. Latif, “Potential of equatorial Atlantic variability to enhance El Niño prediction,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2278–2283 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Lumpkin and G. C. Johnson, “Global ocean surface velocities from drifters: mean, variance, El Nino–southern oscillation response, and seasonal cycle,” J. Geophys. Res. 118 (6), 2992–3006 (2013). doi 10.1002/jgrc.20210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. D. Neelin, D. S. Battisti, A. C. Hirst, et al., “ENSO theory,” J. Geophys. Res., C: Oceans Atmos. 103 (7), 14261–14290 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu. A. Romanov, N. A. Romanova, and P. Romanov, “Changing effect of El Niño on Antarctic iceberg distribution: from canonical El Niño to El Niño Modoki,” J. Geophys. Res., C: Oceans Atmos. 119 (1), 595–614 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Servain, J. Picaut, and J. Merle, “Evidence of remote forcing in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean,” J. Physical. Oceanogr. 12 (5), 457–463 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. E. Trenberth and D. J. Shea, “On the evolution of the southern oscillation,” Mon. Weather Rev. 115 (12), 3078–3096 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. van Loon and D. J. Shea, “The southern oscillation. Part IV: Anomalies of sea level pressure on the southern hemisphere and on Pacific sea surface temperature during development of a warm event,” Mon. Weather Rev. 115 (2), 370–379 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. G. T. Walker, “Correlation in seasonal variations of weather, VIII: A preliminary study of World weather,” in Memoirs of the India Meteorological Department (Meteorological Office, India, 1923), Vol. 24, Part 4, pp. 75–131.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Wyrtki, “El-Niño–the dynamic response of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to atmospheric forcing,” J. Physical. Oceanogr. 5 (4), 572–584 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Sonechkin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.I. Byshev, V.G. Neiman, Yu.A. Romanov, I.V. Serykh, D.M. Sonechkin, 2016, published in Okeanologiya, 2016, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 179–185.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byshev, V.I., Neiman, V.G., Romanov, Y.A. et al. Statistical significance and climatic role of the Global Atmospheric Oscillation. Oceanology 56, 165–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701602003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143701602003X

Keywords

Navigation