Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geological structure and petroleum resource potential of the North Sea basin

  • Marine Geology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

The North Sea basin occupies a spacious depression almost isometric in shape. In the west and northwest, the basin is bordered by the continental crust consolidated during the Precambrian, Caledonian, and Hercynian orogenic epochs, which now forms epiplatformal orogenic structures. They are represented by the London-Brabant uplift and the Arden massif in the southwest and south and the Baltic Shield in the east and northeast. The North Sea basin may be considered as an ancient aulacogen that was transformed in the Early Mesozoic into a complex system of continental rifts and grabens. The sedimentary cover of the basin is represented by a thick (8.5–12.5 km) Ordovician-Quaternary sequence. Oil and gas generation in the sedimentary cover of the basin is likely connected with four main productive sequences: the coaliferous Upper Carboniferous (Westphalian), the subsalt Zechstein, the Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous (Lotharingian, Toarcian, Kimmeridgian, and Weldian bituminose shales), and the shaly Cenozoic. The large oil and gas reserves in the North Sea’s sedimentary cover (over 280 fields) implies that the above-mentioned sequences have realized their oil-generating potential. The present-day position of the main oil and gas generation zones in the sedimentary section of the North Sea explains the distribution of the oil and gas fields through the basin from the genetic standpoint. The petroleum resource potential of the basin is still significant. In this regard, most promising are the spacious shelf areas, turbidite sediments, deep Paleozoic sequences, and continental slopes in the northern part of the basin, which remains insufficiently investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Geodekyan and A. Zabanbark, Geology and Location of Oil and Gas Resources in the World Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Geodekyan, A. Zabanbark, and A. I. Konyukhov, Tectonic and Lithologic Issues of Oil and Gas Content of Continental Margins (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Kh. Dikenshtein, V. V. Glushko, B. A. Solov’ev, et al., Oil and Gas Deposits of the Northwestern European Oil and Gas Province (Nedra, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Zabanbark and A. I. Konyukhov, “Petroleum Potential of Continental Slopes in the World Ocean: A Tectonic Aspect,” Geotectonics 39(1), 87–93 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. I. Konyukhov, “Organic Matter in the Mesozoic-Cenozoic History of the Atlantic,” in Organic Matter of Recent and Fossil Sediments (Nauka, Moscow, 1985), pp. 85–96 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. E. Khain, Tectonics of Continents and Oceans (Moscow) [in Russian].

  7. V. E. Khain and L. E. Levin, “Tectonic Types of Marginal and Inland Seas and Oceanic and Suboceanic Crust,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. Geol., No. 6, 3–18 (1978).

  8. R. Azmy, E. Poty, and U. Brand, “High-Resolution Isotope Stratigraphy of the Devonian-Carboniferous Boundary in the Namur-Danian Basin,” Sedimentary Geology 216, 117–124 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Beckett, “Deeper, Rougher, Further-In Search of the Last North Sea Oil,” The Guardian, March 27, 5–7 (2007).

  10. S. R. F. Branter, “The East Braye Field,” Geol. Soc. London. Memoirs, No. 20, 191–197 (2003).

  11. T. Bugge, J. E. Ringas, D. A. Leith, et al., “Upper Permian as a New Play Model on the Mid-Norwegian Continental Shelf,” AAPG Bull. 86(1), 107–127 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. D. Corneliuc, “Geothermal Aspects of Hydrocarbon Exploration in the North Sea Area,” Norges. Geol. Unders, No. 316, 75–104 (1975).

  13. F. Derumaux, “Le Permien Evaporitique de Mer du Nord: Relation Entre Tectonique et Sedimentologie,” Bull. Cent. Rech. Explor. Prod. ELF Aquitaine 4(1), 495–510 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Dore and B. A. Vining, North-West Europe and Global Perspectives (Harstad, 2005).

  15. “Encore to Appraise Cobra Gas Find in Early 2008,” Oil Gas J. 106(1), 8 (2008).

  16. J. Gray, Petroleum Prospectivity of the Principal Sedimentary Basins of the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (Promote UK, 2010).

  17. M. L. Harper, “Approximate Geothermal Gradients in the North Sea Basin,” Nature, No. 6 P, 230–261 (1971).

  18. “Intervention Beatrice Field Oil Flow,” Oil Gas J. 108(6), 10 (2010).

  19. Uch. Izundu, “Pressure Mounts on UK Government to UKCS Operating Conditions,” Oil Gas J. 107(31), 36–38 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. “Jacket, Piles Finished for Buzzard Platform,” Oil Gas J. 107(31), 9 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. S. Lervik, “Triassic Lithostratigraphy of the Northern North Sea Basin,” Norweg. J. Geol. 86, 93–116 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. “Norway Approves Gudrun Field Development,” Oil Gas J. 108(23), 8 (2010).

  23. “OMV Makes Discovery West on the Shetlands,” Oil Gas J. 107(40), 8 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Pedersen, D. A. Karlsen, J. E. Lie, and H. Brunstad, Petroleum Potential and Thermal Maturity of Paleozoic Sediments from the North Sea Region (Univ. of Oslo Publ., Oslo, Norway, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. “Petrofac Begins Don Field Drilling Campaign,” Oil Gas J. 106(34), 9 (2008).

  26. H. S. Pettingill, “Turbidite Play’s Immaturity Means Big “Potential Remains”,” Oil Gas J. 96(31), 106–112 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Praeg, M. S. Stoker, P. M. Shannon, et al., “Episodic Cenozoic Tectonism and Development of the NW European “Passive” Continental Margin,” Mar. Petrol. Geol., No. 22, 977–1005 (2005).

  28. M. Radler, “Total Reserves, Production Climb on Mixed Results,” Oil Gas J. 108(46), 46–49 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. “StatoilHydro Publishes Troll Blend Assay,” Oil Gas J. 108(3), 48 (2010).

  30. “Talisman Lets Engineering Contract for Ume Field,” Oil Gas J. 105(22), 8 (2007).

  31. A. N. Thomas, P. J. Walmsley, and D. A. Jenkins, “The Forties Field,” Norg. Geol. Unders 316, 105–120 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  32. “UK’s Moth a Dual Oil, Gas-Condensate Find,” Oil Gas J. 106(25), 8 (2008).

  33. P. I. Walmsley, “Oil and Gas Developments in the North Sea,” in Proced. of IX World Petroleum Congress (London, 1975), pp. 123–158.

  34. J. Westwood, “Upstream Outlays of $40 Billion Expected Off Europe in 2006,” Oil Gas J. 104(29), 37–42 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Westwood, “Basins Off NW Europe Offer Opportunities in Troubled Seas,” Oil Gas J. 105(31), 36–42 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. A. Ziegler, “The Geological Evolution of the North Sea Area in the Tectonic Framework of North-Western Europe,” AAPG Bull. 92(3), 83–98 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Nakhimovskii 36, Moscow, 117997, Russia

    A. Zabanbark

Authors
  1. A. Zabanbark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Zabanbark.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A. Zabanbark, 2012, published in Okeanologiya, 2012, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 547–560.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zabanbark, A. Geological structure and petroleum resource potential of the North Sea basin. Oceanology 52, 513–525 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437012030125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437012030125

Keywords

Search

Navigation