Abstract
We study the complexity of the realization of Boolean functions by circuits in infinite complete bases containing all monotone functions with zero weight (cost of use) and finitely many nonmonotone functions with unit weight. The complexity of the realization of Boolean functions in the case where the only nonmonotone element of the basis is negation was completely described by A. A. Markov: the minimum number of negations sufficient for the realization of an arbitrary Boolean function f (the inversion complexity of the function f) is equal to ⌈log2(d(f) + 1)⌉, where d(f) is the maximum (over all increasing chains of sets of values of the variables) number of changes of the function value from 1 to 0. In the present paper, this result is generalized to the case of the computation of Boolean functions over an arbitrary basis B of prescribed form. It is shown that the minimum number of nonmonotone functions sufficient for computing an arbitrary Boolean function f is equal to ⌈log2(d(f)/D(B) +1)⌉, where D(B) = max d(ω); the maximum is taken over all nonmonotone functions ω of the basis B.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. A. Markov, “On inversion complexity of systems of functions,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 116 (6), 917–919 (1957).
O. B. Lupanov, Asymptotic Estimates of Complexity of Control Systems (Izd. Moskov. Univ., Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].
J. E. Savage, The Complexity of Computing (Wiley, New York, 1976; Faktorial,Moscow, 1998).
A. A. Markov, “On inversion complexity of a system of Boolean functions,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 150 (3), 477–479 (1963).
E. N. Gilbert, “Theoretical–structural properties of closing switching functions,” in Collection of Papers in Cybernetics (Inostr. Lit.,Moscow, 1960), No. 1, pp. 175–188 [Russian transl. ].
É. I. Nechiporuk, “On complexity of circuits in some bases containing nontrivial elements with zero weights,” in Problems of Cybernetics (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1962), No. 8, pp. 123–160 [in Russian].
M. J. Fischer, “The complexity of negation–limited networks–a brief survey,” in Automata Theory and Formal Languages, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1975), Vol. 33, pp. 71–82.
H. Morizumi, A Note on the Inversion Complexity of Boolean Functions in Boolean Formulas, arXiv: 0811. 0699 (2008).
S. Jukna, Boolean Function Complexity. Advances and Frontiers, in Algorithms Combin. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 2012), Vol. 27.
E. Blais, C. L. Canonne, I. C. Oliveira, R. A. Servedio, and L.–Y. Tan, “Learning circuits with few negations,” in Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform. (Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz–Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2015), Vol. 40, pp. 512–527.
S. Guo, T. Malkin, I. C. Oliveira, and A. Rosen, “The power of negations in cryptography,” in Theory of Cryptography. Part I, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 2015), Vol. 9014, pp. 36–65.
V. V. Kochergin and A. V. Mikhailovich, Inversion Complexity of Functions of Multi–Valued Logic, arXiv: 1510. 05942 (2015).
V. V. Kochergin and A. V. Mikhailovich, “The minimum number of negations in circuits for systems of multi–valued functions,” Diskret. Mat. 28 (4), 80–90 (2016) [DiscreteMath. Appl. 27 (5), 295–302 (2017)].
V. V. Kochergin and A. V. Mikhailovich, Some Extensions of the Inversion Complexity of Boolean Function, arXiv: 1506. 04485 (2015).
V. V. Kochergin and A. V. Mikhailovich, “On the complexity of circuits in bases containing monotone elements with zero weights,” Prikl. Diskret. Mat., No. 4 (30), 24–31 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Russian Text © V. V. Kochergin, A. V. Mikhailovich, 2019, published in Matematicheskie Zametki, 2019, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 32–41.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kochergin, V.V., Mikhailovich, A.V. Exact Value of the Nonmonotone Complexity of Boolean Functions. Math Notes 105, 28–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434619010048
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434619010048