Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of Temperature and Heat Flux in the Earth: The Influence of Sphericity of the Mantle

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure of thermal convection is determined by the spatial distribution of temperature in the mantle. However, in the literature, when modeling various manifestations of convection, little attention is paid to the degree of correspondence of the temperature distribution calculated in the model with the real temperature in the mantle, and often the temperature distribution is not even presented. In this paper, we analyze the effect on the distribution of temperature and heat fluxes of internal heat sources and the sphericity of the mantle, as well as the effects of dissipation and adiabatic compressibility. Using the Cartesian model leads to a large discrepancy between the calculated distribution of the heat flux and temperature with the observational data. It is shown that the effect of sphericity of the mantle can be approximately interpreted as an additional effective negative internal heat source. At the same time, for the parameters of the modern Earth, it turned out by chance that this effective source is approximately equal in modulus (or rather somewhat more) to the real positive internal heat source (due to radioactivity and secular cooling) and compensates for it. Therefore, the numerous literature results of modeling mantle convection in Cartesian coordinates including internal heat sources are poorly consistent with the actual temperature in the mantle. For the convection model in the modern mantle, this discrepancy can be approximately eliminated by simply eliminating real internal heat sources from the convection equations. The depth distribution of temperature in the mantle of the modern Earth is presented, which is optimally consistent with both the available measurement data (reference points) and the results of refined numerical modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arevalo, R., Jr., McDonough, W.F., and Luong, M., “The K/U ratio of the silicate Earth: insights into mantle composition, structure and thermal evolution,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2009, vol. 278, pp. 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry, A.J., Danyushevsky, L.V., O’Neill, H.C., Newville, M., and Sutton, S.R., “Oxidation state of iron in komatiitic melt inclusions indicates hot Archaean mantle,” Nature, 2008, vol. 455, pp. 960– 963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies, J.H. and Davies, D.R., “Earth’s surface heat flux,” Solid Earth, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Faccenda, M. and Dal Zilio, L., “The role of solid-solid phase transitions in mantle convection,” Lithos, 2017, vol. 268–271, pp. 198–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaupart, C., Labrosse, S., Lucazeau, F., and Mareschal, J.-C., Temperatures, heat, and energy in the mantle of the Earth, in Treatise on Geophysics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, vol. 7, pp. 223–270.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katsura, T., Yoneda, A., Yamazaki, D., Yoshino, T., and Ito, E., “Adiabatic temperature profile in the mantle,” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2010, vol. 183, pp. 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, Y., Deschamps, F., and Tackley, P.J., “Effects of the post-perovskite phase transition properties in the stability and structure of premodial reservoirs in the lower mantle of the Earth,” Earth Planet. Sci. Let., 2015, vol. 432, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moresi, L.N. and Gurnis, M., “Constraints on lateral strength of slabs from 3-D dynamic flow models,” Earth Planet. Sci. Let., 1996, vol. 138, pp. 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trubitsyn, A.P., “Two stages of thermal evolution of the continental lithosphere,” Izv., Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 2019, vol. 55, pp. 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433819070090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trubitsyn, V.P., “Continental drift and world ocean level variations,” Izv., Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 2018, vol. 54, pp. 1534–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trubitsyn, V.P., “Viscosity distribution in the mantle convection models,” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2016, vol. 52, pp. 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trubitsyn, V.P. and Trubitsyn, A.P., “Numerical model for the generation of the ensemble of lithospheric plates and their penetration through the 660-km boundary,” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, pp. 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhong, S., “Constraints on thermochemical convection of the mantle from plume heat flux, plume excess temperature and upper mantle temperature,” J. Geophys. Res., 2006, vol. 111, B04409. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003972

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Trubitsyn.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trubitsyn, A.P., Trubitsyn, V.P. Distribution of Temperature and Heat Flux in the Earth: The Influence of Sphericity of the Mantle. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 56, 837–844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820080101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820080101

Keywords:

Navigation