Advertisement

Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 1164–1173 | Cite as

A Subpixel Classification of Multispectral Satellite Imagery for Interpetation of Tundra-Taiga Ecotone Vegetation (Case Study on Tuliok River Valley, Khibiny, Russia)

  • A. I. Mikheeva
  • O. V. Tutubalina
  • M. V. Zimin
  • E. I. Golubeva
Methods and Means of Processing and Interpretation of Space Information
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The tundra–taiga ecotone plays significant role in northern ecosystems. Due to global climatic changes, the vegetation of the ecotone is the key object of many remote-sensing studies. The interpretation of vegetation and nonvegetation objects of the tundra–taiga ecotone on satellite imageries of a moderate resolution is complicated by the difficulty of extracting these objects from the spectral and spatial mixtures within a pixel. This article describes a method for the subpixel classification of Terra ASTER satellite image for vegetation mapping of the tundra–taiga ecotone in the Tuliok River, Khibiny Mountains, Russia. It was demonstrated that this method allows to determine the position of the boundaries of ecotone objects and their abundance on the basis of quantitative criteria, which provides a more accurate characteristic of ecotone vegetation when compared to the per-pixel approach of automatic imagery interpretation.

Keywords

spectral unmixing subpixel classification tundra–taiga ecotone vegetation Terra ASTER treeline 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, M. and Hook, S., ASTER User Handbook Version 2, Pasadena: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, T., Climate change 2007: An assessment of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Change, 2007, vol. 446, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  3. Boardman, J.W. and Kruse, F.A., Automated spectral analysis: A geologic example using AVIRIS data, North Grapevine Mountains, Nevada, in Proceedings of the Tenth Thematic Conference on Geologic Remote Sensing, San Antonio, Texas, 9–12 May, 1994, Ann Arbor: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, 1994, pp. I-407–I-418.Google Scholar
  4. Boardman, J.W., Leveraging the high dimensionality of AVIRIS data for improved subpixel target unmixing and rejection of false positives: Mixture tuned matched filtering, in Proceedings of the 5th JPL Geoscience Workshop, Green, R.O., Ed., Pasadena: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 1998, pp. 55–56.Google Scholar
  5. Callaghan, T., Crawford, R., and Eronen, M., The dynamics of the tundra–taiga boundary: An overview and suggested coordinated and integrated approach to research, Ambio, 2002, special no. 12, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
  6. Callaghan, T.V., Tweedie, C.E., Åkerman, J., et al., Multidecadal changes in tundra environments and ecosystems: Synthesis of the International Polar Year–Back to the Future Project (IPY–BTF), Ambio, 2011, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golubeva, E.I., Plyushkyavichyute, Y., Rees, G., and Tutubalina, O., Remote sensing methods for phytomass estimation and mapping of tundra vegetation, Geogr. Environ. Sustainability, 2010, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jensen, J.R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Krause, K., Radiometric Use of QuickBird Imagery (Technical Note), Longmont, Colorado, DigitalGlobe, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. Kravtsova, V.I., Tutubalina, O.V., and Hofgaard, A., Aerospace mapping of the status and position of northern forest limit, Geogr. Environ. Sustainability, 2012, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kravtsova, V.I. and Loshkareva, A.R., Dynamics of vegetation in the tundra–taiga ecotone on the Kola Peninsula depending on climate fluctuations, Russ. J. Ecol., 2013, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loshkareva, A.R. and Koroleva, N.E., Methodical peculiarities of large-scale mapping of forest tundra vegetation cover, Arktika Sever, 2013, no. 10.Google Scholar
  13. Mathisen, I.E., Mikheeva, A., Tutubalina, O.V., et al., Fifty years of tree line change in the Khibiny Mountains, Russia: Advantages of combined remote sensing and dendroecological approaches, Appl. Veg. Sci., 2014, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–16.Google Scholar
  14. Novichikhin, A.E. and Tutubalina, O.V., Integration of image processing algorithms to interpret forest vegetation in very high resolution satellite imagery, Zemlya Kosmosa–Naibolee Eff. Resheniya, 2009, no. 3, pp. 40–42.Google Scholar
  15. Mikheeva, A.I., Spatial variability of the upper forest line in Khibiny Mountains as determined from remote sensing data, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2010, no. 4, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
  16. Mikheeva, A.I., Study of the change in the upper forest boundary according to aerospace imagery, Geod. Kartogr., 2011, no. 1, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
  17. Rashmi, S., Addamani, S., and Ravikiran, S., Spectral angle mapper algorithm for remote sensing image classification, Int. J. Innovative Sci. Eng. Technol., 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 201–205.Google Scholar
  18. Strahler, A.H., Woodcock, C.E., and Smith, J.A., On the nature of models in remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 1986, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Williams, A.P. and Hunt, E.R., Estimation of leafy spurge cover from hyperspectral imagery using mixture tuned matched filtering, Remote Sens. Environ., 2002, no. 82, pp. 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Mikheeva
    • 1
  • O. V. Tutubalina
    • 1
  • M. V. Zimin
    • 1
  • E. I. Golubeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of GeographyMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations